Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2018 Jan;22(1):23-33. 10.4196/kjpp.2018.22.1.23.

Histone deacetylase inhibition attenuates hepatic steatosis in rats with experimental Cushing's syndrome

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Korea. inkim@knu.ac.kr
  • 2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Korea.
  • 3Cell and Matrix Research Institute, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Korea.
  • 4BK21 Plus KNU Biomedical Convergence Program, Department of Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Korea.

Abstract

Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a collection of symptoms caused by prolonged exposure to excess cortisol. Chronically elevated glucocorticoid (GC) levels contribute to hepatic steatosis. We hypothesized that histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) could attenuate hepatic steatosis through glucocorticoid receptor (GR) acetylation in experimental CS. To induce CS, we administered adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH; 40 ng/kg/day) to Sprague-Dawley rats by subcutaneous infusion with osmotic mini-pumps. We administered the HDACi, sodium valproate (VPA; 0.71% w/v), in the drinking water. Treatment with the HDACi decreased steatosis and the expression of lipogenic genes in the livers of CS rats. The enrichment of GR at the promoters of the lipogenic genes, such as acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Acc), fatty acid synthase (Fasn), and sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c (Srebp1c), was markedly decreased by VPA. Pan-HDACi and an HDAC class I-specific inhibitor, but not an HDAC class II a-specific inhibitor, attenuated dexamethasone (DEX)-induced lipogenesis in HepG2 cells. The transcriptional activity of Fasn was decreased by pretreatment with VPA. In addition, pretreatment with VPA decreased DEX-induced binding of GR to the glucocorticoid response element (GRE). Treatment with VPA increased the acetylation of GR in ACTH-infused rats and DEX-induced HepG2 cells. Taken together, these results indicate that HDAC inhibition attenuates hepatic steatosis hrough GR acetylation in experimental CS.

Keyword

Cushing's syndrome; Glucocorticoid receptor; HDAC inhibitor; Hepatic steatosis; Sodium valproate

MeSH Terms

Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase
Acetylation
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone
Animals
Cushing Syndrome*
Dexamethasone
Drinking Water
Hep G2 Cells
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
Histone Deacetylases*
Histones*
Hydrocortisone
Infusions, Subcutaneous
Lipogenesis
Liver
Rats*
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Receptors, Glucocorticoid
Response Elements
Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1
Valproic Acid
Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone
Dexamethasone
Drinking Water
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
Histone Deacetylases
Histones
Hydrocortisone
Receptors, Glucocorticoid
Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1
Valproic Acid

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Effects of VPA treatment on ACTH-induced steatosis.Representative images of livers from rats treated with vehicle (n=6), VPA (n=7), ACTH (n=6), or ACTH with VPA (n=7). Liver sections were stained with Oil Red O, trichrome, or H&E to compare between treatment groups. (Bar=50 µm, stain magnification 200×).

  • Fig. 2 Effects of VPA treatment on the expression of lipogenesis genes in the liver.Expression of lipogenesis genes Fasn (A), Acc (B), Scd1 (C), and Srepb1c (D) was quantified by RT-qPCR. VPA treatment decreased the expression of lipogenesis genes in ACTH-induced rats. (E) The expression of lipogenesis proteins was detected by western blotting. (F) Relative protein expression was quantified by optical densitometry (ImageJ software; http://rsbweb.nih.gov). VPA treatment decreased lipogenesis protein expression in ACTH-induced rats. The graphs show the mean±SE of 3 independent experiments. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 vs. control; #p<0.05 and ##p<0.01 vs. ACTH.

  • Fig. 3 Effect of VPA treatment on the enrichment of GR and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) onto the promoters of target genes in the rat liver.The enrichment of GR and Pol II at promoters of lipogenesis genes was analyzed by ChIP. Schematic diagrams show the locations of the GREs, as well as the PCR amplifications following the ChIP assay, for the Fasn (A), Acc (B), Scd1 (C), and Srebp1c (D) promoters (upper). TSS; transcription start site. The ChIP assays were quantified by qPCR. ACTH infusion increased enrichment of GR and Pol II on Fasn, Acc, and Srebp1c, which were decreased by VPA treatment. The graphs show the mean±SE of 5 independent experiments. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 vs. control; #p<0.05 and ##p<0.01 vs. ACTH.

  • Fig. 4 Effect of dexamethasone (DEX) on lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells.(A) HepG2 cells were treated with DEX (1.0, 10, and 100 nM) for 24 and 48 h. Lipid accumulation was analyzed by Oil Red O staining. Original magnification, 40×. (B) Acc, Fasn, Scd1, and Srepb1c expression levels were quantified by RT-qPCR. Treatment with DEX for 24 h increased expression of Acc, Fasn, Scd1, and Srepb1c in a dose-dependent manner in HepG2 cells. (C) DEX (10 nM) increased the expression of Acc, Fasn, Scd1, and Srepb1c in a time-dependent manner. The graphs show the mean±SE of 3 independent experiments. #p<0.05, ##p<0.001 vs. vehicle.

  • Fig. 5 Effect of VPA treatment on expression of lipogenesis genes by DEX in HepG2 cells.The expression of lipogenesis genes Acc (A), Fasn (B), Scd1 (C), and Srepb1c (D) was quantified by RT-qPCR. HepG2 cells were pretreated with VPA (0.1, 1.0 and 10 mM) for 6 h then incubated with DEX (10 nM) for 24 h. Pretreatment with VPA decreased the DEX-induced expression of lipogenesis genes in a dose-dependent manner. The graphs show the mean±SE of 3 independent experiments *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. DEX.

  • Fig. 6 Effect of HDAC inhibitors on lipid accumulation and expression of Srepb1c by DEX in HepG2 cells.HepG2 cells were pretreated with VPA (10 mM), SAHA (5.0 µM), TSA (1.0 µM), MS275 (5.0 µM), and MC1568 (5.0 µM) for 6 h then incubated with or without DEX (10 nM) for 48 h. Lipid accumulation was analyzed by Oil Red O stain. Original magnification, 40×. (B) Cells were pretreated with VPA (0.1, 1.0, and 10 mM), SAHA (0.1, 1.0, and 10 µM), TSA (0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 µM), MS275 (1.0, 10, and 100 µM), and MC1568 (0.1, 5.0, and 10 µM) for 6 h then incubated with DEX (10 nM) for 48 h. The expression of Srebp1c was quantified by RT-qPCR. Treatment with DEX increased lipid accumulation and the expression of Srebp1c, which were decreased by pretreatment with the pan-HDACi VPA, SAHA and TSA, or the HDAC class I-specific inhibitor MS275, but not with the HDAC class II aspecific inhibitor MC1568. The graphs show the mean±SE of 3 independent experiments. #p<0.05 vs. the mock.

  • Fig. 7 Effect of VPA treatment on binding of GR or Pol II on GRE of Srebp1c promoter.(A) The enrichment of GR and Pol II at the promoters for Srebp1c was analyzed by ChIP. The ChIP assays were quantified by qPCR. Treatment with DEX (10 nM) increased the enrichment of GR and Pol II on the Srebp1c promoter, which was decreased by pretreatment with VPA. The graphs show the mean±SE of 3 independent experiments. (*p<0.05 vs. control; #p<0.05 vs. DEX). (B) EMSA. HepG2 cells were pretreated with or without VPA (10 mM) for 6 h then incubated with DEX (10 nM) for 6 h. DEX induced binding of GR to the GRE, which was decreased by pretreatment with VPA. The gel is representative of 3 independent experiments.

  • Fig. 8 VPA treatment attenuated Fasn transcriptional activity.(A) HepG2 cells were cotransfected with expression vectors for wild-type GR, QQ-mutant GR (Glu mt), or RR-mutant GR (Arg mt), as well as a luciferase vector driven by the Fasn promoter. Treatment with DEX increased transcriptional activity in HepG2 cells transfected with wild-type GR and RR-mutant GR, but not the QQ-mutant. Pretreatment with VPA (10 mM) resulted in a significant decrease in DEX-induced promoter activity in HepG2 cells transfected with wild-type GR, but not RR-mutant GR. The graphs show the mean±SE of 5 independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. control; #p<0.05 vs. DEX.

  • Fig. 9 VPA treatment increased acetylation of GR.(A) HepG2 cells were pretreated with VPA (10 mM) for 3 h then incubated with DEX (10 nM) for 6 h. (C) GR acetylation in rat livers. GR acetylation was analyzed by western blot (WB) with anti–ac-K antibody after immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-GR antibody. (B and D) The relative protein expression was quantified by optical densitometry (ImageJ software; http://rsbweb.nih. gov). The graphs show the mean±SE of 6 independent experiments. GR acetylation was increased by VPA treatment. ##p<0.01 vs. DEX and ACTH.

  • Fig. 10 Summary.HDAC inhibition attenuates hepatic steatosis through GR acetylation in experimental CS.


Cited by  1 articles

Maternal high-fructose intake during pregnancy and lactation induces metabolic syndrome in adult offspring
Soohyeon Koo, Mina Kim, Hyun Min Cho, Inkyeom Kim
Nutr Res Pract. 2021;15(2):160-172.    doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.2.160.


Reference

1. Lonser RR, Nieman L, Oldfield EH. Cushing's disease: pathobiology, diagnosis, and management. J Neurosurg. 2017; 126:404–417. PMID: 27104844.
Article
2. Woods CP, Hazlehurst JM, Tomlinson JW. Glucocorticoids and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015; 154:94–103. PMID: 26241028.
Article
3. Chrousos GP. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332:1351–1362. PMID: 7715646.
Article
4. Rosen J, Miner JN. The search for safer glucocorticoid receptor ligands. Endocr Rev. 2005; 26:452–464. PMID: 15814846.
Article
5. Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Evans D, Kaltsas G, Isidori AM, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB, Reznek RH. Hepatic steatosis in Cushing's syndrome: a radiological assessment using computed tomography. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149:543–548. PMID: 14640995.
Article
6. Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liver Dis. 2008; 28:339–350. PMID: 18956290.
Article
7. Lewis JR, Mohanty SR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a review and update. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55:560–578. PMID: 20101463.
Article
8. Kassel O, Herrlich P. Crosstalk between the glucocorticoid receptor and other transcription factors: molecular aspects. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007; 275:13–29. PMID: 17689856.
Article
9. Wang JC, Gray NE, Kuo T, Harris CA. Regulation of triglyceride metabolism by glucocorticoid receptor. Cell Biosci. 2012; 2:19. PMID: 22640645.
Article
10. Lemke U, Krones-Herzig A, Berriel Diaz M, Narvekar P, Ziegler A, Vegiopoulos A, Cato AC, Bohl S, Klingmüller U, Screaton RA, Müller-Decker K, Kersten S, Herzig S. The glucocorticoid receptor controls hepatic dyslipidemia through Hes1. Cell Metab. 2008; 8:212–223. PMID: 18762022.
Article
11. Mueller KM, Kornfeld JW, Friedbichler K, Blaas L, Egger G, Esterbauer H, Hasselblatt P, Schlederer M, Haindl S, Wagner KU, Engblom D, Haemmerle G, Kratky D, Sexl V, Kenner L, Kozlov AV, Terracciano L, Zechner R, Schuetz G, Casanova E, Pospisilik JA, Heim MH, Moriggl R. Impairment of hepatic growth hormone and glucocorticoid receptor signaling causes steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Hepatology. 2011; 54:1398–1409. PMID: 21725989.
Article
12. Faus H, Haendler B. Post-translational modifications of steroid receptors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006; 60:520–528. PMID: 16949786.
13. Galliher-Beckley AJ, Williams JG, Cidlowski JA. Ligand-independent phosphorylation of the glucocorticoid receptor integrates cellular stress pathways with nuclear receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 31:4663–4675. PMID: 21930780.
Article
14. Chrousos GP, Kino T. Intracellular glucocorticoid signaling: a formerly simple system turns stochastic. Sci STKE. 2005; 2005:pe48. PMID: 16204701.
Article
15. Patel BM, Raghunathan S, Porwal U. Cardioprotective effects of magnesium valproate in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 728:128–134. PMID: 24530414.
Article
16. Khan S, Kumar S, Jena G. Valproic acid reduces insulin-resistance, fat deposition and FOXO1-mediated gluconeogenesis in type-2 diabetic rat. Biochimie. 2016; 125:42–52. PMID: 26944797.
Article
17. Buchwald M, Krämer OH, Heinzel T. HDACi.targets beyond chromatin. Cancer Lett. 2009; 280:160–167. PMID: 19342155.
18. Kadiyala V, Patrick NM, Mathieu W, Jaime-Frias R, Pookhao N, An L, Smith CL. Class I lysine deacetylases facilitate glucocorticoid-induced transcription. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288:28900–28912. PMID: 23946490.
Article
19. Lauffer BE, Mintzer R, Fong R, Mukund S, Tam C, Zilberleyb I, Flicke B, Ritscher A, Fedorowicz G, Vallero R, Ortwine DF, Gunzner J, Modrusan Z, Neumann L, Koth CM, Lupardus PJ, Kaminker JS, Heise CE, Steiner P. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor kinetic rate constants correlate with cellular histone acetylation but not transcription and cell viability. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288:26926–26943. PMID: 23897821.
Article
20. Kang SH, Seok YM, Song MJ, Lee HA, Kurz T, Kim I. Histone deacetylase inhibition attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis through acetylation of mineralocorticoid receptor in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Mol Pharmacol. 2015; 87:782–791. PMID: 25667225.
Article
21. Lee HA, Lee DY, Cho HM, Kim SY, Iwasaki Y, Kim IK. Histone deacetylase inhibition attenuates transcriptional activity of mineralocorticoid receptor through its acetylation and prevents development of hypertension. Circ Res. 2013; 112:1004–1012. PMID: 23421989.
Article
22. Lee HA, Song MJ, Seok YM, Kang SH, Kim SY, Kim I. Histone deacetylase 3 and 4 complex stimulates the transcriptional activity of the mineralocorticoid receptor. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0136801. PMID: 26305553.
Article
23. Kadmiel M, Cidlowski JA. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 34:518–530. PMID: 23953592.
Article
24. Macfarlane DP, Forbes S, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and fatty acid metabolism in humans: fuelling fat redistribution in the metabolic syndrome. J Endocrinol. 2008; 197:189–204. PMID: 18434349.
Article
25. Arnaldi G, Scandali VM, Trementino L, Cardinaletti M, Appolloni G, Boscaro M. Pathophysiology of dyslipidemia in Cushing's syndrome. Neuroendocrinology. 2010; 92(Suppl 1):86–90. PMID: 20829625.
Article
26. Lagace DC, Nachtigal MW. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by valproic acid blocks adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:18851–18860. PMID: 14985358.
Article
27. Catalioto RM, Maggi CA, Giuliani S. Chemically distinct HDAC inhibitors prevent adipose conversion of subcutaneous human white preadipocytes at an early stage of the differentiation program. Exp Cell Res. 2009; 315:3267–3280. PMID: 19766628.
Article
28. Wakil SJ, Abu-Elheiga LA. Fatty acid metabolism: target for metabolic syndrome. J Lipid Res. 2009; 50(Suppl):S138–S143. PMID: 19047759.
Article
29. Mashima T, Seimiya H, Tsuruo T. De novo fatty-acid synthesis and related pathways as molecular targets for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer. 2009; 100:1369–1372. PMID: 19352381.
Article
30. Strable MS, Ntambi JM. Genetic control of de novo lipogenesis: role in diet-induced obesity. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 45:199–214. PMID: 20218765.
31. Peserico A, Simone C. Physical and functional HAT/HDAC interplay regulates protein acetylation balance. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011:371832. PMID: 21151613.
Article
32. Nader N, Chrousos GP, Kino T. Circadian rhythm transcription factor CLOCK regulates the transcriptional activity of the glucocorticoid receptor by acetylating its hinge region lysine cluster: potential physiological implications. FASEB J. 2009; 23:1572–1583. PMID: 19141540.
Article
33. Ito K, Yamamura S, Essilfie-Quaye S, Cosio B, Ito M, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Histone deacetylase 2-mediated deacetylation of the glucocorticoid receptor enables NF-κB suppression. J Exp Med. 2006; 203:7–13. PMID: 16380507.
Article
34. Delcuve GP, Khan DH, Davie JR. Roles of histone deacetylases in epigenetic regulation: emerging paradigms from studies with inhibitors. Clin Epigenetics. 2012; 4:5. PMID: 22414492.
Article
35. Chittiboina P, Lu J, Wang X, Piazza MG, Zhuang Z. Histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat is a novel, promising treatment for cushing disease. Neurosurgery. 2016; 63(Suppl 1):183.
36. Sul HS, Wang D. Nutritional and hormonal regulation of enzymes in fat synthesis: studies of fatty acid synthase and mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene transcription. Annu Rev Nutr. 1998; 18:331–351. PMID: 9706228.
Article
37. Zhao LF, Iwasaki Y, Zhe W, Nishiyama M, Taguchi T, Tsugita M, Kambayashi M, Hashimoto K, Terada Y. Hormonal regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase isoenzyme gene transcription. Endocr J. 2010; 57:317–324. PMID: 20139635.
Article
38. Reddy TE, Pauli F, Sprouse RO, Neff NF, Newberry KM, Garabedian MJ, Myers RM. Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation. Genome Res. 2009; 19:2163–2171. PMID: 19801529.
Article
39. So AY, Chaivorapol C, Bolton EC, Li H, Yamamoto KR. Determinants of cell- and gene-specific transcriptional regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor. PLoS Genet. 2007; 3:e94. PMID: 17559307.
Article
40. Yu CY, Mayba O, Lee JV, Tran J, Harris C, Speed TP, Wang JC. Genome-wide analysis of glucocorticoid receptor binding regions in adipocytes reveal gene network involved in triglyceride homeostasis. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e15188. PMID: 21187916.
Article
41. Bai X, Hong W, Cai P, Chen Y, Xu C, Cao D, Yu W, Zhao Z, Huang M, Jin J. Valproate induced hepatic steatosis by enhanced fatty acid uptake and triglyceride synthesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017; 324:12–25. PMID: 28366540.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr