Korean Circ J.  2012 Jun;42(6):371-378. 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.6.371.

Linkage of Epidemiologic Evidence With the Clinical Aspects of Metabolic Syndrome

Affiliations
  • 1Institute for Health Promotion, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. jsunha@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, glucose intolerance, high triglycerides, and a low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol level. MetS is known to be associated with cardiovascular diseases. In order to diagnose MetS, definitions such as National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III, American Heart Association/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, International Diabetes Federation, World Health Organization, European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance and American College of Endocrinology are widely used. However, using different criteria may lead to confusion regarding the diagnosis and treatment of patients with MetS in the primary care setting. Our objected was to review 3 aspects concerning MetS using the Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiatives study of 123892 healthy Koreans (1994-2001) that had a maximum follow-up of 12 years. The 3 aspects were reviewed by determination of the association of MetS with the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Based on our findings, each metabolic factor associated with MetS was not weighted equally. The hazard ratio (HR) was higher in individuals with higher glucose compared with the HR in individuals with higher body mass index. Individuals with pre-MetS (having 1 or 2 metabolic factors) had 1.5-2.3 fold higher risk of developing ASCVD and IHD in both genders. In the presence of MetS, both singly and in combination, precede the development of ASCVD and IHD and individuals with pre-MetS must not be ignored as there is no apparent threshold in defining MetS. Furthermore, MetS may complement the Framingham Risk Score and can be used as the first line approach to treat the ASCVD or IHD.

Keyword

Metabolic cardiovascular syndrome; Atherosclerosis; Ischemic heart disease

MeSH Terms

Adult
Atherosclerosis
Body Mass Index
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cholesterol
Complement System Proteins
Endocrinology
Follow-Up Studies
Glucose
Glucose Intolerance
Heart
Humans
Hypertension
Insulin Resistance
Lung
Metabolic Syndrome X
Myocardial Ischemia
Primary Health Care
Risk Factors
Triglycerides
World Health Organization
Cholesterol
Complement System Proteins
Glucose
Triglycerides

Figure

  • Fig. 1 HR for IHD and stroke according to the metabolic syndrome component in Korean men in the MSRI after adjusting for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, and exercise (all p<0.0001). HR: hazard ratio, IHD: ischemic heart disease, BMI: body mass index, TG: triglyceride, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, BP: blood pressure, MSRI: Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiatives.

  • Fig. 2 HRs for development of ASCVD and IHD according to MetS in Korean men and women in the MRSI after adjusting for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, and exercise. A: HRs for development of ASCVD according to MetS using NCEP definition. B: HRs for development of IHD according to MetS using NCEP and AHA definition. HR: hazard ratio, ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, IHD: ischemic heart disease, Mets: Metabolic syndrome, NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program, MSRI: Metabolic Syndrome Research Initiatives, AHA: American Heart Association.


Reference

1. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001. 24:683–689.
2. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002. 288:2709–2716.
3. Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, et al. Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study. Circulation. 2005. 112:666–673.
4. Ford ES. The metabolic syndrome and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all-causes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II Mortality Study. Atherosclerosis. 2004. 173:309–314.
5. Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM, Haffner SM. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). National Ch-olesterol Education Program (NCEP). NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes. 2003. 52:1210–1214.
6. Eckel RH, Alberti KG, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2010. 375:181–183.
7. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998. 15:539–553.
8. Balkau B, Charles MA. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR). Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1999. 16:442–443.
9. Einhorn D, Reaven GM, Cobin RH, et al. American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance syndrome. Endocr Pract. 2003. 9:237–252.
10. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001. 285:2486–2497.
11. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2003. 24:1601–1610.
12. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005. 112:2735–2752. Erratum in: Circulation 2005;112:e297-8.
13. Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. American Diabetes Association. European Association for the Study of Diabetes. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005. 28:2289–2304.
14. Stern MP, Williams K, González-Villalpando C, Hunt KJ, Haffner SM. Does the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease? Diabetes Care. 2004. 27:2676–2681. Erratum in: Diabetes Care 2005;28:238.
15. Meigs JB. Metabolic syndrome: in search of a clinical role. Diabetes Care. 2004. 27:2761–2763. Erratum in: Diabetes Care 2005;28:238.
16. Kimm H, Yun JE, Jo J, Jee SH. Low serum bilirubin level as an independent predictor of stroke incidence: a prospective study in Korean men and women. Stroke. 2009. 40:3422–3427.
17. Kim HC, Kang DR, Nam CM, et al. Elevated serum aminotransferase level as a predictor of intracerebral hemorrhage: Korea Medical Insurance Corporation Study. Stroke. 2005. 36:1642–1647.
18. Jee SH, Sull JW, Park J, et al. Body-mass index and mortality in Korean men and women. N Engl J Med. 2006. 355:779–787.
19. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. 1992. 10th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.
20. Park JK, Kim KS, Kim CB, et al. The accuracy of ICD codes for cerebrovascular diseases in medical insurance claims. Korean J Prev Med. 2000. 33:76–82.
21. Inoue S, Zimmet P, Caterson I, et al. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatments: International Obesity Task Force. 2000. Sydney: Western Pacific Region of the World Health Organization, Health commuication.
22. Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C. American Heart Association. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association Conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004. 109:433–438.
23. Grundy SM, Hansen B, Smith SC Jr, Cleeman JI, Kahn RA. American Heart Association. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. American Diabetes Association. Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Circulation. 2004. 109:551–556.
24. Grundy SM. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004. 89:2595–2600.
25. Blake GJ, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation. 2002. 106:1930–1937.
26. Aronson D, Rayfield EJ. How hyperglycemia promotes atherosclerosis: molecular mechanisms. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2002. 1:1.
27. Haffner SM. Cardiovascular risk factors and the prediabetic syndrome. Ann Med. 1996. 28:363–370.
28. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome: a new world-wide definition: a Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006. 23:469–480.
29. Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I, Ross R, Church TS, Blair SN. The importance of waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome: prospective analyses of mortality in men. Diabetes Care. 2006. 29:404–409.
30. Yoon YS, Lee ES, Park C, Lee S, Oh SW. The new definition of metabolic syndrome by the international diabetes federation is less likely to identify metabolically abnormal but non-obese individuals than the definition by the revised national cholesterol education program: the Korea NHANES Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007. 31:528–534.
31. World Health Organization. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Report of a WHO Consultation: Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. 1999. Geneva: World Health Organization.
32. Kadota A, Hozawa A, Okamura T, et al. Relationship between metabolic risk factor clustering and cardiovascular mortality stratified by high blood glucose and obesity: NIPPON DATA90, 1990-2000. Diabetes Care. 2007. 30:1533–1538.
33. Ford ES. Risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes associated with the metabolic syndrome: a summary of the evidence. Diabetes Care. 2005. 28:1769–1778.
34. Anderson JL, Horne BD, Jones HU, et al. Which features of the metabolic syndrome predict the prevalence and clinical outcomes of angiographic coronary artery disease? Cardiology. 2004. 101:185–193.
35. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2012. 35:Suppl 1. S64–S71.
36. Andreadis EA, Tsourous GI, Tzavara CK, et al. Metabolic syndrome and incident cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a Mediterranean hypertensive population. Am J Hypertens. 2007. 20:558–564.
37. Nakanishi N, Takatorige T, Fukuda H, et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome as predictors of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004. 64:59–70.
38. D'Agostino RB Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, Wilson P. CHD Risk Prediction Group. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA. 2001. 286:180–187.
39. Jaquet A, Deloumeaux J, Dumoulin M, Bangou J, Donnet JP, Foucan L. Metabolic syndrome and Framingham risk score for prediction of cardiovascular events in Caribbean Indian patients with blood glucose abnormalities. Diabetes Metab. 2008. 34:177–181.
40. McNeill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, et al. The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2005. 28:385–390.
41. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Lennon L, Morris RW. Metabolic syndrome vs Framingham Risk Score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2005. 165:2644–2650.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr