Tuberc Respir Dis.  2018 Jan;81(1):80-87. 10.4046/trd.2017.0108.

Effects of Macrolide and Corticosteroid in Neutrophilic Asthma Mouse Model

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. cmcyhg@gmail.com
  • 2Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Asthma is a disease of chronic airway inflammation with heterogeneous features. Neutrophilic asthma is corticosteroid-insensitive asthma related to absence or suppression of TH2 process and increased TH1 and/or TH17 process. Macrolides are immunomodulatory drug that reduce airway inflammation, but their role in asthma is not fully known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of macrolides in neutrophilic asthma and compare their effects with those of corticosteroids.
METHODS
C57BL/6 female mice were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Clarithromycin (CAM) and/or dexamethasone (DXM) were administered at days 14, 15, 21, 22, and 23. At day 24, the mice were sacrificed.
RESULTS
Airway resistance in the OVA+LPS exposed mice was elevated but was more attenuated after treatment with CAM+DXM compared with the monotherapy group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid study, total cells and neutrophil counts in OVA+LPS mice were elevated but decreased after CAM+DXM treatment. In hematoxylin and eosin stain, the CAM+DXM-treated group showed less inflammation additively than the monotherapy group. There was less total protein, interleukin 17 (IL-17), interferon γ, and tumor necrosis factor α in the CAM+DXM group than in the monotherapy group (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.001). More histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) activity was recovered in the DXM and CAM+DXM challenged groups than in the control group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Decreased IL-17 and recovered relative HDAC2 activity correlated with airway resistance and inflammation in a neutrophilic asthma mouse model. This result suggests macrolides as a potential corticosteroid-sparing agent in neutrophilic asthma.

Keyword

Neutrophils; Asthma; Macrolides; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Th17 Cells; Inflammation; Histone Deacetylases

MeSH Terms

Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Airway Resistance
Animals
Asthma*
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
Clarithromycin
Dexamethasone
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Female
Hematoxylin
Histone Deacetylase 2
Histone Deacetylases
Humans
Inflammation
Interferons
Interleukin-17
Lipopolysaccharides
Macrolides
Mice*
Neutrophils*
Ovalbumin
Th17 Cells
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Clarithromycin
Dexamethasone
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Hematoxylin
Histone Deacetylase 2
Histone Deacetylases
Interferons
Interleukin-17
Lipopolysaccharides
Macrolides
Ovalbumin
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Figure

  • Figure 1 Schematic outline of the neutrophilic asthma mouse model. Mice were sensitized via OVA on days 0 and 7 by i.p. injection and challenged through inhalation of OVA on days 14, 15, 21, 22, and 23. For neutrophilic asthma, mice were additionally challenged with LPS on days 21, 22, and 23. DXM by i.p. injection and CAM via oral gavage were challenged every 24 hours on days 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 23. OVA: ovalbumin; i.p.: intraperitoneally; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; DXM: dexamethasone; CAM: clarithromycin; i.n: intranasally.

  • Figure 2 Airway responsiveness to methacholine by forced oscillation technique. Airway responsiveness was expressed in terms of respiratory systemic Rrs. Baseline Rrs value was assessed after 3 minutes of nebulized PBS. Rrs was measured in response to increasing challenges of methacholine dose (6.25 mg/mL, 12.5 mg/mL, 25 mg/mL, and 50 mg/mL) in control, O+L, O+L+C, O+L+D, and O+L+D+C group. Rrs was increased after OVA+LPS challenge. Rrs of combination of CAM+DXM group was significantly changed compared to the CAM or DXM group especially at 50 mg/mL of methacholine challenge. O+L vs. all (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001), O+L+C vs. O+L+D+C (†p<0.05), O+L+D vs. O+L+D+C (‡‡p<0.01). Rrs: resistance; PBS: phosphate buffered saline; O: ovalbumin; L: lipopolysaccharide; C: clarithromycin; D: dexamethasone.

  • Figure 3 Combination therapy of macrolide and corticosteroid inhibited lung inflammation in murine model of neutrophilic asthma. (A) BALF analysis was performed to evaluate lung inflammation. The number of total cell counts, eosinophil, and neutrophil was significantly increased after OVA+LPS challenge. The number of total cell counts was significantly more decreased in CAM+DXM group compared to decrease in CAM or DXM group. Neutrophils in combination of CAM+DXM treatment group was decreased and it was not seen in CAM or DXM group. The number of eosinophils was not decreased in CAM, DXM, and CAM+DXM group. (B) Accumulation of inflammatory cells improved significantly more in CAM+DXM group compared to DXM group in H&E staining. O+L vs. all (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001), O+L+C vs. O+L+D+C (†p<0.05, ††p<0.01, †††p<0.001), O+L+D vs. O+L+D+C (‡‡p<0.01, ‡‡‡p<0.001). BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; O: ovalbumin (OVA); L: lipopolysaccharide (LPS); C: clarithromycin (CAM); D: dexamethasone (DXM).

  • Figure 4 TH17 inflammation was attenuated by combination of macrolide and corticosteroid. Total protein, TH2 inflammation, TH17 inflammation, and proinflammatory cytokine in BALF analysis was increased after OVA+LPS challenge. (A) The number of total protein in BALF was decreased in DXM and CAM+DXM group. (B) IL-5 in BALF, marker of TH2 inflammation, was not significantly decreased in DXM or CAM+DXM group. (C) IL-17, marker of TH17 inflammation, was significantly decreased in DXM and CAM+DXM group. (D) IL-13, marker of TH2 inflammation, was evaluated in lung tissue. There was no significant decrease in DXM or CAM+DXM group. (E, F) Proinflammatory cytokine was decreased in combination of CAM+DXM and it was not decreased in monotherapy of CAM or DXM. O+L vs. all (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001), O+L+C vs. O+L+D+C (†p<0.05, †††p<0.001). BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; O: ovalbumin (OVA); L: lipopolysaccharide (LPS); C: clarithromycin (CAM); D: dexamethasone (DXM); IL: interleukin; IFN-γ: interferon γ; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α.

  • Figure 5 Macrolide has potent effects of recovering HDAC2 activity with corticosteroid. (A) HDAC2 activity was decreased after OVA+LPS challenge. It was not recovered after CAM treatment, but it was recovered after DXM or CAM+DXM treatment. (B) DXM or DXM+CAM group showed higher density than OVA+LPS or CAM group in western blot analysis. (C) Relative density of HDAC2/β-actin was well correlated these tendency and CAM+DXM group was further increased in density of HDAC2/β-actin than DXM group. O+L vs. all (*p<0.05, **p<0.01), O+L+C vs. O+L+D+C (†p<0.05, †††p<0.001), O+L+D vs. O+L+D+C (‡‡p<0.01). HDAC2: histone deacetylase-2; O: ovalbumin (OVA); L: lipopolysaccharide (LPS); C: clarithromycin (CAM); D: dexamethasone (DXM).


Reference

1. Reddel HK, Hurd SS, FitzGerald JM. World Asthma Day. GINA 2014: a global asthma strategy for a global problem. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014; 18:505–506.
Article
2. Pelaia G, Vatrella A, Maselli R. The potential of biologics for the treatment of asthma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012; 11:958–972.
Article
3. Wenzel SE. Complex phenotypes in asthma: current definitions. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 26:710–715.
Article
4. Barry LE, Sweeney J, O'Neill C, Price D, Heaney LG. The cost of systemic corticosteroid-induced morbidity in severe asthma: a health economic analysis. Respir Res. 2017; 18:129.
Article
5. Accordini S, Corsico AG, Braggion M, Gerbase MW, Gislason D, Gulsvik A, et al. The cost of persistent asthma in Europe: an international population-based study in adults. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013; 160:93–101.
Article
6. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380:2197–2223.
7. Lai CK, Kim YY, Kuo SH, Spencer M, Williams AE. Cost of asthma in the Asia-Pacific region. Eur Respir Rev. 2006; 15:10–16.
Article
8. Bahadori K, Doyle-Waters MM, Marra C, Lynd L, Alasaly K, Swiston J, et al. Economic burden of asthma: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2009; 9:24.
Article
9. Alam R, Good J, Rollins D, Verma M, Chu H, Pham TH, et al. Airway and serum biochemical correlates of refractory neutrophilic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; 140:1004–1014.
Article
10. Green RH, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Parker D, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Analysis of induced sputum in adults with asthma: identification of subgroup with isolated sputum neutrophilia and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids. Thorax. 2002; 57:875–879.
Article
11. Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. The immunology of asthma. Nat Immunol. 2015; 16:45–56.
Article
12. Wenzel SE. Asthma phenotypes: the evolution from clinical to molecular approaches. Nat Med. 2012; 18:716–725.
Article
13. Ito K, Herbert C, Siegle JS, Vuppusetty C, Hansbro N, Thomas PS, et al. Steroid-resistant neutrophilic inflammation in a mouse model of an acute exacerbation of asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008; 39:543–550.
Article
14. Kanoh S, Rubin BK. Mechanisms of action and clinical application of macrolides as immunomodulatory medications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23:590–615.
Article
15. Shinkai M, Henke MO, Rubin BK. Macrolide antibiotics as immunomodulatory medications: proposed mechanisms of action. Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 117:393–405.
Article
16. Wong EH, Porter JD, Edwards MR, Johnston SL. The role of macrolides in asthma: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2:657–670.
Article
17. Simpson JL, Powell H, Boyle MJ, Scott RJ, Gibson PG. Clarithromycin targets neutrophilic airway inflammation in refractory asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 177:148–155.
Article
18. Brusselle GG, Vanderstichele C, Jordens P, Deman R, Slabbynck H, Ringoet V, et al. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations in severe asthma (AZISAST): a multicentre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Thorax. 2013; 68:322–329.
Article
19. Bergquist M, Jonasson S, Hjoberg J, Hedenstierna G, Hanrieder J. Comprehensive multiplexed protein quantitation delineates eosinophilic and neutrophilic experimental asthma. BMC Pulm Med. 2014; 14:110.
Article
20. Zhang F, Huang G, Hu B, Qian GS, Song Y. Recombinant HMGB1 A box protein inhibits Th17 responses in mice with neutrophilic asthma by suppressing dendritic cell-mediated Th17 polarization. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015; 24:110–118.
Article
21. Zhao Y, Huang Y, He J, Li C, Deng W, Ran X, et al. Rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, attenuates airway inflammation by inhibiting the proliferation of effector T cells in a murine model of neutrophilic asthma. Immunol Lett. 2014; 157:9–15.
22. Zhao S, Jiang Y, Yang X, Guo D, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. Lipopolysaccharides promote a shift from Th2-derived airway eosinophilic inflammation to Th17-derived neutrophilic inflammation in an ovalbumin-sensitized murine asthma model. J Asthma. 2017; 54:447–455.
Article
23. McGovern TK, Robichaud A, Fereydoonzad L, Schuessler TF, Martin JG. Evaluation of respiratory system mechanics in mice using the forced oscillation technique. J Vis Exp. 2013; (75):e50172.
Article
24. Shalaby KH, Gold LG, Schuessler TF, Martin JG, Robichaud A. Combined forced oscillation and forced expiration measurements in mice for the assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness. Respir Res. 2010; 11:82.
Article
25. Marwick JA, Ito K, Adcock IM, Kirkham PA. Oxidative stress and steroid resistance in asthma and COPD: pharmacological manipulation of HDAC-2 as a therapeutic strategy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007; 11:745–755.
Article
26. Wenzel SE, Szefler SJ, Leung DY, Sloan SI, Rex MD, Martin RJ. Bronchoscopic evaluation of severe asthma: persistent inflammation associated with high dose glucocorticoids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 156(3 Pt 1):737–743.
27. Jatakanon A, Uasuf C, Maziak W, Lim S, Chung KF, Barnes PJ. Neutrophilic inflammation in severe persistent asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160(5 Pt 1):1532–1539.
Article
28. Annunziato F, Romagnani S. Mouse T helper 17 phenotype: not so different than in man after all. Cytokine. 2011; 56:112–115.
Article
29. Spagnolo P, Fabbri LM, Bush A. Long-term macrolide treatment for chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2013; 42:239–251.
Article
30. Friedlander AL, Albert RK. Chronic macrolide therapy in inflammatory airways diseases. Chest. 2010; 138:1202–1212.
Article
31. Kim RY, Pinkerton JW, Gibson PG, Cooper MA, Horvat JC, Hansbro PM. Inflammasomes in COPD and neutrophilic asthma. Thorax. 2015; 70:1199–1201.
Article
32. Barnes PJ. Corticosteroid resistance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 131:636–645.
Article
33. Kobayashi Y, Wada H, Rossios C, Takagi D, Charron C, Barnes PJ, et al. A novel macrolide/fluoroketolide, solithromycin (CEM-101), reverses corticosteroid insensitivity via phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway inhibition. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 169:1024–1034.
Article
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr