J Lab Med Qual Assur.  2013 Dec;35(2):93-99.

Comparison of COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Qualitative Test v2.0 with COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus Test v2.0 for the Qualitative Detection of Hepatitis C Virus RNA in Korean Clinical Samples

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kimhs54@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
We comparatively evaluated the performance of the conventional COBAS Amplicor HCV test v2.0 (CAM; Roche Molecular Systems, USA) and the newly developed COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test v2.0 (CAP/CTM; Roche Molecular Systems) for qualitative detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in clinical samples.
METHODS
Six hundred serum samples (100 HCV-positive, 500 HCV-negative, as determined by CAM) were selected and analysed using the new qualitative HCV RNA test, CAP/CTM qualitative test. Results were compared by confirmatory CAP/CTM quantitative test, which is a quantitative HCV RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction by Roche Molecular Systems, and anti-HCV test (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). Twenty-two additional serum samples, which gave a gray zone result by CAM, were selected for comparison.
RESULTS
The two qualitative HCV RNA assays yielded concordant results for 586 of 600 tested samples (concordance rate, 97.7%; kappa coefficient, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 0.96; P<0.001). Upon re-testing by CAM, we found that the concordance rate increased to 98.2% (kappa coefficient, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89 to 0.97; P<0.001). The additional 22 samples showing gray zone results for CAM were retested and were also tested by CAP/CTM. The results for 13 of these samples changed to negative and were now concordant with the CAP/CTM and confirmatory CAP/CTM quantitative results. For the remaining samples, the results were variable. For all the 22 samples, the results of the new CAP/CTM were in agreement with those obtained by confirmatory CAP/CTM quantitative test.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the two assays were in good agreement, with 97.7% concordance rate. However, CAP/CTM is more sensitive than CAM and showed no gray zone results. Therefore, it can be a more efficient and useful test for the qualitative detection of HCV RNA in clinical samples.

Keyword

Hepatitis C virus; Qualitative HCV RNA assay; COBAS Amplicor; COBAS AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan; Quantitative HCV RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

MeSH Terms

Hepacivirus*
Hepatitis C*
Hepatitis*
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA
RNA
Full Text Links
  • JLMQA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr