J Korean Soc Spine Surg.  2009 Sep;16(3):153-159. 10.4184/jkss.2009.16.3.153.

Risk Factors for the Progressive Osteoporotic Spinal Fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea. boscoa@empal.com
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective risk-factor analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study investigated the clinical and radiological risk factors associated with the progression of osteoporotic spinal fractures (OSFs) after conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: Nonunion and cleft signs on radiographs are strongly associated with complicated osteoporotic spinal fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2007, 84 patients (15 males and 69 females; mean 72.6 yrs) were enrolled in this retrospective review. The progressive OSF, clinical and radiological factors were analyzed considering the progression of the kyphotic angle (PKA>20degrees) and the presence of intravertebral cleft signs (IVC). Age, gender, body mass index, vertebral level involved, BMD score, MRI classification and initial kyphotic angle were adopted for the analysis. For statistical analysis, a chi-square test was performed to analyze the relationship between each factor and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the multifactorial explanatory factor.
RESULTS
The presence of IVC was related to the thoracolumbar fracture, mid-portion MR classification and high body mass index. PKA>20degrees was related to the thoracolumbar fracture and mid-portion classification. For multifactorial analysis using these seven factors, two factors (the level of fracture and MR classification) were found to be associated with the presence of IVC with statistical significance. In the thoracolumbar fracture, the incidence of IVC was 5.2 times higher than the other levels. The incidence of IVC in endplate classification was 16% lower than in the mid-portion.
CONCLUSION
BMI, the fracture level involved and MR classification were associated with the development of IVC and PKA>20degrees for a conservative treatment of OSF. Multiple logistic analysis revealed the level of the fracture and MR classification to be significant.

Keyword

Osteoporosis; Spinal fracture; Nonunion; Risk factors

MeSH Terms

Body Mass Index
Humans
Incidence
Logistic Models
Male
Osteoporosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Spinal Fractures

Figure

  • Fig. 1. A case of complicated osteoporotic compression fracture. A 65-year-old woman suffered from intractable back and flank pain and progressive weakness of the lower extremities. She underwent anterior decompression and fusion surgery.

  • Fig. 2. MRI characteristics of osteoporotic compression fracture. (A) The cases with findings of signal change around the endplate and disruption of endplate are classified as an endplate type. (B) The cases with findings of signal change at the midportion of vertebral body and disruption of anterior cortex are classified as a midportion type.


Cited by  4 articles

Progression of Compression and Related Factors in Conservative Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Young Do Koh, Jeong Soo Park
J Korean Fract Soc. 2015;28(2):132-138.    doi: 10.12671/jkfs.2015.28.2.132.

The Influence of Initial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings on the Compression Rate of Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
Seok-Ha Hwang, Seung-Pyo Suh, Young-Kyun Woo, Ho-Seung Jeon, Ho-Won Jeong
J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2018;53(4):341-349.    doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2018.53.4.341.

Predictive Risk Factors for Refracture after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
Sang-Kuk Kang, Chan Woo Lee, Noh Kyoung Park, Tae-Wook Kang, Jeong-Wook Lim, Ki Yong Cha, Jung Hwan Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(6):844-851.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.844.

Survival Analysis of Conservative Treatement in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
Young Do Koh, Jong-Oh Kim, Rag Gyu Kim, Dae Youn Kim, Nam-Ki Kim, Dong Jun Kim
J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2012;19(4):138-144.    doi: 10.4184/JKSS.2021.19.4.138.


Reference

1). Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int. 2005; 16:3–7.
Article
2). Freedman BA, Potter BK, Nesti LJ, Giuliani JR, Hampton C, Kuklo TR. Osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures-continued missed opportunities. Spine J. 2008; 8:756–762.
Article
3). Kim DH, Vaccaro AR. Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J. 2006; 6:479–487.
Article
4). Kempinsky WH, Morgan PP, Boniface WR. Osteoporotic kyphosis with paraplegia. Neurology. 1958; 8:181–186.
Article
5). Heo DH, Chin DK, Yoon YS, Kuh SU. Recollapse of previous vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Osteoporosis Int. 2008 Jul 18. (Epub ahead of print).
Article
6). Ito Y, Hasegawa Y, Toda K, Nakahara S. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of delayed vertebral collapse resulting from osteoporotic spinal fracture. Spine J. 2002; 2:101–106.
Article
7). Baba H, Maezawa Y, Kamitani K, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. Osteoporotic vertebral collapse with late neurological complications. Paraplegia. 1995; 33:281–289.
Article
8). Kutsal YG, Atalay A, Arslan S, et al. .:. Awareness of osteoporotic patients. Osteoporosis Int. 2005; 16:128–133.
Article
9). Audran M. Drug combination strategies for osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2006; 73:374–378.
10). Lippuner K. Medical treatment of vertebral osteoporosis. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12:132–141.
Article
11). Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: a prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporosis Int. 1993; 3:148–153.
Article
12). Moon ES, Kim HS, Park JO, et al. .:. The incidence of new vertebral compression fractures in women after kyphoplasty and factors involved. Yonsei Med J. 2007; 48:645–652.
Article
13). Yang SC, Chen WJ, Yu SW, Tu YK, Kao YH, Chung KC. Revision strategies for complications and failure of vertebroplasties. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17:982–988.
Article
14). Hashidate H, Kammimura M, Nakagawa H, Takahara K, Uchiyama S. Pseudoarthrosis of vertebral fracture: radiographic and characteristic clinical features and natural history. J Orthop Sci. 2006; 11:28–33.
Article
15). Hasegawa K, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Takahashi H. Vertebral pseudarthrosis in the osteoporotic spine. Spine. 1998; 23:2201–2206.
Article
16). Libicher M, Appelt A, Berger I, et al. .:. The intravertebral vacuum phenomenon as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: results from a radiological and histological study. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17:2248–2252.
17). McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T. The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2003; 18:24–29.
Article
18). Mirovsky Y, Anekstein Y, Shalmon E, Peer A. Vacuum Clefts of the Vertebral Bodies. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26:1634–1640.
19). Sarli M, Perez Manghi FC, Gallo R, Zanchetta JR. The vacuum cleft sign: an uncommon radiological sign. Osteoporosis Int. 2005; 16:1210–1214.
Article
20). Sugita M, Watanabe N, Mikami Y, Hase H, Kubo T. Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18:376–381.
Article
21). Yu CW, Hsu CY, Shih TT, Chen BB, Fu CJ. Vertebral osteonecrosis: MR imaging findings and related changes on adjacent levels. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28:42–47.
22). Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton LJ. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1991; 6:207–215.
Article
23). Ratcliffe JF. The arterial anatomy of the adult human lumbar vertebral body: a microarteriographic study. J Anat. 1980; 131:57–79.
24). Ratcliffe JF. Arterial changes in the human vertebral body associated with aging. The ratios of peripheral to central arteries and arterial coiling. Spine. 1986; 11:235–240.
25). Theodorou DJ. The intravertebral vacuum cleft sign. Radiology. 2001; 221:787–788.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr