J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2008 Nov;33(6):499-506. 10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499.

Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea. ygcho@chosun.ac.kr

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the push-out strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements. Newly extracted 36 human mandibular premolars which had single root canal were selected and their crown portions were removed. The root canal was instrumented using PROTAPER(TM) system and obturated using continuous wave technique. In each root, a 9-mm deep post space was prepared. #2 translucent fiber post (DT Light post, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.) was cemented using injection technique with Uni-dose needle tip (Bisco) and six different resin cements. The tested resin cements were Duo-Link (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.), Variolink II (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan), Multilink Automix (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), and Maxcem (Kerr Co., CA, U.S.A.). After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, each root was transversally sectioned into approximately 1-mm thick sections. This procedure resulted in 6 serial sections per root. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu Co.) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (p=0.05). The push-out strength of the groups which cemented fiber post with Panavia F and Multilink Automix were lower than those of the other groups. But, there were no statistically significant difference among groups at a probability level of 0.05.

Keyword

Fiber post; Resin cement; Root dentin; Push-out test; Injection technique

MeSH Terms

Analysis of Variance
Bicuspid
Collodion
Crowns
Dental Pulp Cavity
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Humans
Light
Needles
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated
Resin Cements
Water
Collodion
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Resin Cements
Water

Figure

  • Figure 1 Device designed for push-out test and universal testing machine


Cited by  2 articles

Effect of surface treatments of fiber posts on bond strength to composite resin cores
Hye-Jo Keum, Hyun-Mi Yoo
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2010;35(3):173-179.    doi: 10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.3.173.

Comparison of push-out bond strength of post according to cement application methods
Seo-Ryeong Kim, Jiwan Yum, Jeong-Kil Park, Bock Hur, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2010;35(6):479-485.    doi: 10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.479.


Reference

1. Sahafi A, Peutzfeidt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5(2):153–162.
2. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observation. Dent Mater. 2002. 18:596–602.
Article
3. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-codoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resion posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(Spec No):15B–18B.
4. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, De Meto RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod. 2005. 31(3):209–211.
Article
5. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod. 2001. 27(12):758–761.
Article
6. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998. 80(2):151–157.
Article
7. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond stength of light- and self-cored adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2005. 30(4):500–506.
8. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Connor KN, Magill JPG, Maguire GR. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pullout test. Dent Mater. 1994. 10:88–89.
9. Goracci C, Sadeck FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhension of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent. 2005. 30(5):627–635.
10. Kallas M, Koss D, Hahn H, Hellmann J. Interfacial stress state present in a "thin-slice" fiber push-out test. J Mater Sci. 1992. 27(14):3821–3826.
Article
11. Valandro LF, Andreatta Filho OD, Valera MC, De Araujo MAM. The effect of adhesive system on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2005. 7(4):331–336.
12. Cho YG, Cho GC. Marginal Microleakage of Self-etching Primer Adhesives and a Self-etching Adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27:493–501.
Article
13. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin post. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:39–44.
14. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent fiber post: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:593–596.
15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Manson PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber post. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:Spec No. 9B–13B.
16. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papaccbini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod. 2005. 31(8):608–612.
Article
17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Geppi S. Influence of microbrush on efficacy of bonding into root canals. Am J Dent. 2002. 15:227–231.
18. Pirani C, Cberasoni S, Foscbi F, Piana G, Lousbine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod. 2005. 31(12):891–894.
Article
19. Fakiha Z, Al-Aujan A, Al-Shamrani S. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques. J Prosthodont. 2001. 10(1):37–41.
Article
20. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Kreijci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:199–205.
Article
21. Feilzer A, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composite for two different curing modes. Dent Mater. 1993. 9:2–5.
22. Tay FR, Gwinnet AJ, Wei SHY. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res. 1995. 74:1168–1178.
Article
23. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993. 24:618–631.
24. Kim JW, Yoo MK, Lee SJ, Lee KW. Microtensile Bonding of Resin Fiber Reinforced Post to Radicular Dentin using Resin Cement. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003. 28:80–87.
Article
25. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of Self-etching Dentin Adhesives with Resin Luting Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005. 30:493–504.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKACD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr