Anesth Pain Med.  2019 Oct;14(4):401-406. 10.17085/apm.2019.14.4.401.

Adverse events of conscious sedation using midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hanji@ewha.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
This study was conducted to identify the types and incidence of adverse events associated with midazolam, which is the most widely used drug to induce conscious sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, and to analyze the factors associated with hypoxemia and sedation failure.
METHODS
Of 87,740 patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy between February 2015 and May 2017, the electronic medical records of 335 who reportedly developed adverse events were retrospectively reviewed, and analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for hypoxemia and sedation failure, the two most frequent adverse events among those manifested during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
RESULTS
The overall adverse event rate was 0.38% (n = 335); hypoxemia was most frequent, accounting for 40.7% (n = 90), followed by sedation failure (34.8%, n = 77), delayed discharge from the recovery room (22.1%, n = 49), and hypotension (2.2%, n = 5). Compared with the control group, the hypoxemia group did not show any significant differences in sex and body weight, but mean age was significantly older (P < 0.001) and a significantly lower dose of midazolam was administered (P < 0.001). In the group with sedation failure, the mean rate was higher in men (P < 0.001) and a significantly higher dose of midazolam was administered (P < 0.001), but no age difference was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Midazolam-based conscious sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy can lead to various adverse events. In particular, as elderly patients are at higher risk of developing hypoxemia, midazolam dose adjustment and careful monitoring are required in this group.

Keyword

Conscious sedation; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Hypoxemia; Midazolam

MeSH Terms

Aged
Anoxia
Body Weight
Conscious Sedation*
Electronic Health Records
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal*
Humans
Hypotension
Incidence
Male
Midazolam*
Recovery Room
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Midazolam

Reference

1. Lee JK, Jang DK, Kim WH, Kim JW, Jang BI. Safety of nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017; 69:55–58. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.1.55. PMID: 28135791.
2. Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, Brill JV, Inadomi JM, Kochman ML, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133:675–701. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002. PMID: 17681185.
3. Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective:a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:356–60. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01711-0. PMID: 15332023.
4. McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:910–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.046. PMID: 18440381.
5. Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy:current issues. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19:463–81. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463. PMID: 23382625. PMCID: PMC3558570.
6. Agostoni M, Fanti L, Gemma M, Pasculli N, Beretta L, Testoni PA. Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy:an 8-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:266–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.028. PMID: 21704990.
7. Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, Calvet X, Moix J, Rué M, et al. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 11:201–4. DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199902000-00023. PMID: 10102233.
8. Trevisani L, Sartori S, Gaudenzi P, Gilli G, Matarese G, Gullini S, et al. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy:are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective?A randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10:3313–7. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3313. PMID: 15484307. PMCID: PMC4572302.
9. Kim KO. Assessement of patient's status during sedation endoscopy. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 40(Suppl 1):106–10.
10. Chokhavatia S, Nguyen L, Williams R, Kao J, Heavner JE. Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:393–6.
11. Im JP. Patient-tailored sedation for colonoscopy Paper presented at:The 48th Seminar of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; 2013 Mar 24, Goyang, Korea. 2013; 119–24.
12. Kim HU. Perfect sedation for endoscopy. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 41(Suppl 2):71–7.
13. Greenblatt DJ, Abernethy DR, Locniskar A, Harmatz JS, Limjuco RA, Shader RI. Effect of age, gender, and obesity on midazolam kinetics. Anesthesiology. 1984; 61:27–35. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198461010-00006. PMID: 6742481.
14. Moon SH. Sedation regimens for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:135–40. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.135. PMID: 24765595. PMCID: PMC3994255.
15. Aun C, Flynn PJ, Richards J, Major E. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for intravenous sedation in dentistry. Anaesthesia. 1984; 39:589–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07370.x. PMID: 6742394.
16. Dietch JT, Jennings RK. Aggressive dyscontrol in patients treated with benzodiazepines. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988; 49:184–8. PMID: 2896665.
17. Jones GM, Doepker BA, Erdman MJ, Kimmons LA, Elijovich L. Predictors of severe hypotension in neurocritical care patients sedated with propofol. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 20:270–6. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-013-9902-6. PMID: 24233892.
18. Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA, Symms MR, Chadalawada V, Liangpunsakul S, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy:administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 1:425–32. DOI: 10.1016/S1542-3565(03)00226-X. PMID: 15017641.
19. Demiraran Y, Korkut E, Tamer A, Yorulmaz I, Kocaman B, Sezen G, et al. The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy:a prospective, randomized study. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007; 21:25–9. DOI: 10.1155/2007/350279. PMID: 17225879. PMCID: PMC2656627.
20. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96:1004–17. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031. PMID: 11964611.
21. Moon SH, Kim HK, Myung DS, Yoon SM, Moon W. Patient monitoring and associated devices during endoscopic sedation. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017; 69:64–7. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.1.64. PMID: 28135793.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr