Acute Crit Care.  2018 Aug;33(3):178-184. 10.4266/acc.2017.00444.

Specification of Subject Sex in Oncology-Related Animal Studies

Affiliations
  • 1Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea. yourejoice@korea.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Osong Medical Innovation Foundation, Cheongju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Growing evidence for clinically significant differences between the sexes has attracted the attention of researchers. However, failures to report a test animal sex and balance the sex ratios of study samples remain widespread in preclinical investigations. We analyzed the sex-reporting rate and sex distributions of test animals in published oncology studies.
METHODS
We selected five oncology journals included in the Scientific Citation Index (SCI) based on impact factors. We identified preclinical investigations with in vivo mouse experiments published in 2015 for inclusion in our study sample. We classified each article by whether or not it reported test subject sex, and by which sex was included. We also recorded whether there were justifications for using one particular sex in single-sex studies (e.g., anatomical reasons) and whether sex-based analyses were conducted for both-sex studies.
RESULTS
We surveyed a total of 382 articles. Half (50.3%) failed to report test animal sex. Among articles that did report sex, 91.7% were single-sex studies, of which 69.4% did not provide any justifications for using the sex included in the study. Relatively few studies 15.7 studies included animals of both sexes, and only 2.3 studies conducted sex-based analyses. These findings are consistent with those of previous research that used other methods to collect data from the literature such as text mining, but our analysis of the provision of justifications for using one sex versus the other is a novel feature.
CONCLUSIONS
Many researchers overlook test subject sex as a factor, but test animal sex should be reported in all preclinical investigations to enhance the reproducibility of research and avoid faulty conclusions drawn from one-sided studies.

Keyword

animal experimentation; bias; data accuracy; data curation; research design; research subjects

MeSH Terms

Animal Experimentation
Animals*
Bias (Epidemiology)
Data Accuracy
Data Curation
Data Mining
Humans
Mice
Research Design
Research Subjects
Sex Distribution
Sex Ratio

Figure

  • Figure 1. Article coding flowchart. In the case of “n” number of experiments in one article, the number of the articles was counted by a sum of 1/n of experiments, in other words, decimal points.

  • Figure 2. Percentages of articles reporting the sexes of test animals in each journal. Overall, 50.3% of articles did not report subject sex, while 49.7% did. In the case of “n” number of experiments in one article, the number of the articles was counted by a sum of 1/n of experiments, in other words, decimal points. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Cancer Res: Cancer Research.

  • Figure 3. Distributions of test subjects’ sex. The percentage of female single-sex studies varied from journal to journal, ranging from 57.5% to 77.9%. For male single-sex studies, the percentages ranged from 14.1% to 32.5%, and for both-sex studies, 7.4% to 10.0%. In the case of “n” number of experiments in one article, the number of the articles was counted by a sum of 1/n of experiments, in other words, decimal points. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Cancer Res: Cancer Research.

  • Figure 4. Distribution of test subjects’ sex with justified cases excluded. Excluding single-sex studies that provided justifications for examining only one sex, 57.3% to 77.9% were female single-sex studies, while 14.1% to 32.6% were male single-sex studies. The percentages of studies including both sexes ranged from 8.1% to 15.4% depending on the journal. In the case of “n” number of experiments in one article, the number of the articles was counted by a sum of 1/n of experiments, in other words, decimal points. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Cancer Res: Cancer Research.

  • Figure 5. Percentages of justified and sex-based analysis. Of all studies, 67.1% used only female mice, while 24.6% used only male mice. The other 8.3% utilized both sexes. Among single-sex studies (studies that utilized only male or female mice), only 30.6% included justifications for using just one sex. Among studies that included both sexes, only 14.6% conducted sex-based subanalyses.


Reference

1. Franconi F, Brunelleschi S, Steardo L, Cuomo V. Gender differences in drug responses. Pharmacol Res. 2007; 55:81–95.
Article
2. Hilliard LM, Nematbakhsh M, Kett MM, Teichman E, Sampson AK, Widdop RE, et al. Gender differences in pressure-natriuresis and renal autoregulation: role of the angiotensin type 2 receptor. Hypertension. 2011; 57:275–82.
3. Wang X, Magkos F, Mittendorfer B. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: it’s not just about sex hormones. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96:885–93.
Article
4. Deasy BM, Lu A, Tebbets JC, Feduska JM, Schugar RC, Pollett JB, et al. A role for cell sex in stem cellmediated skeletal muscle regeneration: female cells have higher muscle regeneration efficiency. J Cell Biol. 2007; 177:73–86.
Article
5. Du L, Bayir H, Lai Y, Zhang X, Kochanek PM, Watkins SC, et al. Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:38563–70.
Article
6. Sorge RE, Mapplebeck JC, Rosen S, Beggs S, Taves S, Alexander JK, et al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18:1081–3.
Article
7. Sechzer JA, Rabinowitz VC, Denmark FL, McGinn MF, Weeks BM, Wilkens CL. Sex and gender bias in animal research and in clinical studies of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and depression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 736:21–48.
Article
8. Huang RS, Kistner EO, Bleibel WK, Shukla SJ, Dolan ME. Effect of population and gender on chemotherapeutic agentinduced cytotoxicity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007; 6:31–6.
Article
9. Midgley R, Kerr DJ. Capecitabine: have we got the dose right? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2009; 6:17–24.
Article
10. Wang J, Huang Y. Pharmacogenomics of sex difference in chemotherapeutic toxicity. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2007; 4:59–68.
11. Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012; 483:531–3.
12. Beery AK, Zucker I. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35:565–72.
Article
13. Mogil JS, Chanda ML. The case for the inclusion of female subjects in basic science studies of pain. Pain. 2005; 117:1–5.
Article
14. Schwartz S, Wongvipat J, Trigwell CB, Hancox U, Carver BS, Rodrik-Outmezguine V, et al. Feedback suppression of PI3Kα signaling in PTEN-mutated tumors is relieved by selective inhibition of PI3Kα. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27:109–22.
Article
15. Langenkamp E, Zhang L, Lugano R, Huang H, Elhassan TE, Georganaki M, et al. Elevated expression of the C-type lectin CD93 in the glioblastoma vasculature regulates cytoskeletal rearrangements that enhance vessel function and reduce host survival. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:4504–16.
Article
16. Adams GN, Rosenfeldt L, Frederick M, Miller W, Waltz D, Kombrinck K, et al. Colon cancer growth and dissemination relies upon thrombin, stromal PAR-1, and fibrinogen. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:4235–43.
Article
17. Wang SH, Yeh SH, Shiau CW, Chen KF, Lin WH, Tsai TF, et al. Sorafenib action in hepatitis B virus X-activated oncogenic androgen pathway in liver through SHP-1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107:pii: djv190.
Article
18. Kim T, Jeon YJ, Cui R, Lee JH, Peng Y, Kim SH, et al. Role of MYC-regulated long noncoding RNAs in cell cycle regulation and tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107:pii: dju505.
Article
19. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8:e1000412.
Article
20. Flórez-Vargas O, Brass A, Karystianis G, Bramhall M, Stevens R, Cruickshank S, et al. Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models. Elife. 2016; 5:pii: e13615.
Article
21. McCullough LD, de Vries GJ, Miller VM, Becker JB, Sandberg K, McCarthy MM. NIH initiative to balance sex of animals in preclinical studies: generative questions to guide policy, implementation, and metrics. Biol Sex Differ. 2014; 5:15.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr