Korean Circ J.  2018 Dec;48(12):1033-1080. 10.4070/kcj.2018.0339.

2018 Korean Guideline of Atrial Fibrillation Management

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cby6908@yuhs.ac
  • 2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Division of Cardiology, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 6Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Cardiology, Ewha Woman University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 9Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in the general population. The Korean Heart Rhythm Society organized a Korean AF Management Guideline Committee and analyzed all available studies regarding the management of AF, including studies on Korean patients. This guideline is based on recent data of the Korean population and the recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Expert consensus or guidelines for the optimal management of Korean patients with AF were achieved after a systematic review with intensive discussion. This article provides general principles for appropriate risk stratification and selection of anticoagulation therapy in Korean patients with AF. This guideline deals with optimal stroke prevention, screening, rate and rhythm control, risk factor management, and integrated management of AF.

Keyword

Atrial fibrillation; Guideline; Anticoagulants; Therapy

MeSH Terms

American Heart Association
Anticoagulants
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Asia
Atrial Fibrillation*
Cardiology
Consensus
Heart
Humans
Mass Screening
Risk Factors
Stroke
Anticoagulants

Figure

  • Figure 1 Annual prevalence (A) and incidence (B) of AF, 2006–2015, stratified by sex. AF = atrial fibrillation. *p value for increasing trends <0.001. †p value for decreasing trends <0.001.

  • Figure 2 Annual incidence (A) and prevalence (B) of AF, 2006–2015, stratified by age. AF = atrial fibrillation. *p value for increasing trends <0.001. †p value for decreasing trends <0.001.

  • Figure 3 The projected prevalence of atrial fibrillation.

  • Figure 4 Temporal trends of newly diagnosed AF patient by CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, 2006–2015. AF = atrial fibrillation.

  • Figure 5 Temporal trends of medical costs, 2006–2015. (A) Korean NHIS total expenditures (million €), (B) total AF hospitalization costs (million €), and (C) the proportion of total AF hospitalization costs to Korean NHIS total expenditures (%). AF = atrial fibrillation; NHIS = National Health Insurance Service. *p value for trends <0.001.

  • Figure 6 Temporal trends in 1-year adverse event rates of prevalent AF Korean population each year. AF = atrial fibrillation; HF = heart failure *p value for trends <0.001.

  • Figure 7 The basic concept of acute and chronic management of AF. Modified from Lip et al.5) AF = atrial fibrillation; NOAC = non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC = oral anticoagulation therapy; TTR = time in therapeutic range.

  • Figure 8 Stroke prevention strategy in patients with AF. AF = atrial fibrillation; HF = heart failure; NOAC = non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; OAC = oral anticoagulation. *CHA2DS2-VASs score: a congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 (doubled), diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (doubled), vascular disease, age 65–74, female.

  • Figure 9 Practical management algorithm in light of the 2018 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, which are evidence based and GRADE. AF = atrial fibrillation; INR = international normalized ratio; NOAC = non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC = oral anticoagulation therapy. *HAS-BLED: hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function (1 point each), stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR, elderly (0.65), drugs/alcohol concomitantly (1 point each).

  • Figure 10 Receiver operating characteristic curves of Δ CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting ischemic stroke during the entire second follow-up period. AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; SE = standard error.

  • Figure 11 AF rate control management. AF = atrial fibrillation; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.

  • Figure 12 AF rhythm control management. (A) acute onset AF and (B) long-term AF. AF = atrial fibrillation.

  • Figure 13 Suggested algorithm for antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing PCI. NOAC = non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC = oral anticoagulant; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; TTR = time in therapeutic range.


Cited by  18 articles

Cardiovascular Research Using the Korean National Health Information Database
Eue-Keun Choi
Korean Circ J. 2020;50(9):754-772.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0171.

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Hyun Lim, Eun Jeong Gong, Byung-Hoon Min, Seung Joo Kang, Cheol Min Shin, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Miyoung Choi, Chan Guk Park, Joo Young Cho, Soo Teik Lee, Ho Gak Kim, Hoon Jai Chun
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020;76(6):282-296.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.142.

Esophageal Endoscopy after High-power and Short-duration Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
Dong Geum Shin, Hong Euy Lim
Korean Circ J. 2020;51(2):154-156.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0488.

Risk Factor Management for Atrial Fibrillation
Boyoung Joung
Korean Circ J. 2019;49(9):794-807.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0212.

Reducing Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: Adherence to Guidelines Has Improved, but Patient Persistence with Anticoagulant Therapy Remains Suboptimal
Nicole Lowres, Katrina Giskes, Charlotte Hespe, Ben Freedman
Korean Circ J. 2019;49(10):883-907.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0234.

Is Lighter Intensity of Warfarin Therapy Enough for Korean Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation?
So-Ryoung Lee
Korean Circ J. 2020;50(2):176-178.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0350.

Social Inequalities of Oral Anticoagulation after the Introduction of Non-Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Hee Tae Yu, Pil-Sung Yang, Jinseub Hwang, Soorack Ryu, Eunsun Jang, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Jong-Youn Kim, Hui-Nam Pak, Moon-Hyoung Lee, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Boyoung Joung
Korean Circ J. 2020;50(3):267-277.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0207.

Guideline of atrial fibrillation management
Boyoung Joung
J Korean Med Assoc. 2019;62(5):265-274.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2019.62.5.265.

Beginning the Journey to Find Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Korean Patients with Atrial Fibrillation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sung Soo Kim, Hyun Kuk Kim
Korean Circ J. 2021;51(5):423-425.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0017.

Current Anticoagulant Usage Patterns and Determinants in Korean Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Hyun Su Ha, Joongmin Kim, Young Soo Lee, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jung Myung Lee, Junbeom Park, Jin-Kyu Park, Ki-Woon Kang, Jaemin Shim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Hyung Wook Park, Myung-Jin Cha, Eue-Keun Choi, Jun Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Changsoo Kim, Boyoung Joung
Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(2):120-128.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.2.120.

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Hyun Lim, Eun Jeong Gong, Byung-Hoon Min, Seung Joo Kang, Cheol Min Shin, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Miyoung Choi, Chan Guk Park, Joo Young Cho, Soo Teik Lee, Ho Gak Kim, Hoon Jai Chun
Clin Endosc. 2020;53(6):663-677.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.192.

Apixaban for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Coexistant Cerebral Atherosclerosis May Increase Recurrent Strokes
Jong S. Kim, Jaseong Koo, Dong-Ick Shin, Byung-Su Kim, Jei Kim, Eung-Gyu Kim, Keun-Sik Hong, Hyeju Yi
J Stroke. 2022;24(1):118-127.    doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.02355.

Causal Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Jung-Ho Yang, Ji-An Jeong, Sun-Seog Kweon, Young-Hoon Lee, Seong-Woo Choi, So-Yeon Ryu, Hae-Sung Nam, Kyeong-Soo Park, Hye-Yeon Kim, Min-Ho Shin
Korean Circ J. 2022;52(3):220-230.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0269.

Optimal Rhythm Control Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Daehoon Kim, Pil-Sung Yang, Boyoung Joung
Korean Circ J. 2022;52(7):496-512.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0078.

Association of Gender With Clinical Outcomes in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Oral Anticoagulants
Minjeong Kim, Jun Kim, Jin-Bae Kim, Junbeom Park, Jin-Kyu Park, Ki-Woon Kang, Jaemin Shim, Eue-Keun Choi, Young Soo Lee, Hyung Wook Park, Boyoung Joung
Korean Circ J. 2022;52(8):593-603.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0399.

Role of Novel Oral Anticoagulant for Patient with Atrial Fibrillation Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Jang-Whan Bae
Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother. 2019;1(1):19-29.    doi: 10.36011/cpp.2019.1.e1.

Dose Selection of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Korean Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
So-Ryoung Lee, Young Keun On
Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother. 2020;2(1):1-10.    doi: 10.36011/cpp.2020.2.e5.

Association Between Serum Bilirubin and Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Si-Woo Kim, Jung-Ho Yang, Sun-Seog Kweon, Young-Hoon Lee, Seong-Woo Choi, So-Yeon Ryu, Hae-Sung Nam, Hye-Yeon Kim, Min-Ho Shin
Korean Circ J. 2023;53(7):472-479.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0003.


Reference

1. Jones C, Pollit V, Fitzmaurice D, Cowan C. Guideline Development Group. The management of atrial fibrillation: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014; 348:g3655.
Article
2. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64:e1–e76.
3. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37:2893–2962.
4. Chiang CE, Okumura K, Zhang S, et al. 2017 consensus of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Arrhythm. 2017; 33:345–367.
Article
5. Lip GY, Banerjee A, Boriani G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
6. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998; 98:946–952.
7. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014; 130:e199–e267.
8. Lee H, Kim TH, Baek YS, et al. The trends of atrial fibrillation-related hospital visit and cost, treatment pattern and mortality in Korea: 10-year nationwide sample cohort data. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:56–64.
Article
9. Kim TH, Yang PS, Uhm JS, et al. CHA2DS2-VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 [doubled], diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack [doubled], vascular disease, age 65–74, female) for stroke in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a Korean nationwide sample cohort study. Stroke. 2017; 48:1524–1530.
10. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002; 113:359–364.
Article
11. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001; 285:2370–2375.
12. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006; 114:119–125.
Article
13. Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:2746–2751.
Article
14. Coyne KS, Paramore C, Grandy S, Mercader M, Reynolds M, Zimetbaum P. Assessing the direct costs of treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States. Value Health. 2006; 9:348–356.
Article
15. Stewart S, Murphy NF, Walker A, McGuire A, McMurray JJ. Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK. Heart. 2004; 90:286–292.
Article
16. Li Y, Pastori D, Guo Y, Wang Y, Lip GY. Risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation: a focus on Asian populations. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 261:92–98.
Article
17. Allan V, Honarbakhsh S, Casas JP, et al. Are cardiovascular risk factors also associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and field synopsis of 23 factors in 32 population-based cohorts of 20 million participants. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117:837–850.
18. Li YG, Pastori D, Farcomeni A, et al. A simple clinical risk score (C2HEST) for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in Asian subjects: derivation in 471,446 Chinese subjects, with internal validation and external application in 451,199 Korean subjects. Chest. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
19. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82:2N–9N.
20. Kim D, Yang PS, Jang E, et al. 10-year nationwide trends of the incidence, prevalence, and adverse outcomes of non-valvular atrial fibrillation nationwide health insurance data covering the entire Korean population. Am Heart J. 2018; 202:20–26.
Article
21. Chao TF, Liu CJ, Tuan TC, et al. Lifetime risks, projected numbers, and adverse outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Taiwan nationwide AF cohort study. Chest. 2018; 153:453–466.
22. Yap KB, Ng TP, Ong HY. Low prevalence of atrial fibrillation in community-dwelling Chinese aged 55 years or older in Singapore: a population-based study. J Electrocardiol. 2008; 41:94–98.
Article
23. Iguchi Y, Kimura K, Aoki J, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in community-dwelling Japanese aged 40 years or older in Japan: analysis of 41,436 non-employee residents in Kurashiki-city. Circ J. 2008; 72:909–913.
24. Lee SR, Choi EK, Han KD, Cha MJ, Oh S. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and estimated thromboembolic risk using the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the entire Korean population. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 236:226–231.
25. Yang PS, Ryu S, Kim D, et al. Variations of prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulation rate according to different analysis approaches. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:6856.
Article
26. Yang PS, Joung B. Regional and socioeconomic inequality of atrial fibrillation with regular hospital visit. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48:635–636.
Article
27. Lee SR, Choi EK, Han K, Cha MJ, Oh S. Prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on geographical distribution and socioeconomic status in the entire Korean population. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48:622–634.
Article
28. Kim D, Yang PS, Jang E, et al. Increasing trends in hospital care burden of atrial fibrillation in Korea, 2006 through 2015. Heart. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
Article
29. Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu BC, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4:313–320.
Article
30. Lee WC, Lamas GA, Balu S, Spalding J, Wang Q, Pashos CL. Direct treatment cost of atrial fibrillation in the elderly American population: a Medicare perspective. J Med Econ. 2008; 11:281–298.
Article
31. Chugh SS, Jui J, Gunson K, et al. Current burden of sudden cardiac death: multiple source surveillance versus retrospective death certificate-based review in a large U.S. community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:1268–1275.
Article
32. Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Crijns HJ, Olshansky B. Rate control in atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 2016; 388:818–828.
Article
33. Schmidt M, Ulrichsen SP, Pedersen L, Bøtker HE, Nielsen JC, Sørensen HT. 30-year nationwide trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Denmark and associated 5-year risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 225:30–36.
Article
34. Schmidt M, Jacobsen JB, Johnsen SP, Bøtker HE, Sørensen HT. Eighteen-year trends in stroke mortality and the prognostic influence of comorbidity. Neurology. 2014; 82:340–350.
Article
35. Freedman B, Camm J, Calkins H, et al. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a report of the AF-SCREEN international collaboration. Circulation. 2017; 135:1851–1867.
36. Mairesse GH, Moran P, Van Gelder IC, et al. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE). Europace. 2017; 19:1589–1623.
37. Arya A, Piorkowski C, Sommer P, Kottkamp H, Hindricks G. Clinical implications of various follow up strategies after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007; 30:458–462.
Article
38. Davis RC, Hobbs FD, Kenkre JE, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the general population and in high-risk groups: the ECHOES study. Europace. 2012; 14:1553–1559.
Article
39. Siontis KC, Gersh BJ, Killian JM, et al. Typical, atypical, and asymptomatic presentations of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: characteristics and prognostic implications. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13:1418–1424.
Article
40. Lowres N, Neubeck L, Redfern J, Freedman SB. Screening to identify unknown atrial fibrillation. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2013; 110:213–222.
41. Boriani G, Laroche C, Diemberger I, et al. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: clinical correlates, management, and outcomes in the EORP-AF Pilot General Registry. Am J Med. 2015; 128:509–518.e2.
Article
42. Potpara TS, Polovina MM, Marinkovic JM, Lip GY. A comparison of clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with first-diagnosed atrial fibrillation: the Belgrade Atrial Fibrillation Study. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:4744–4749.
Article
43. Hobbs FD, Fitzmaurice DA, Mant J, et al. A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study. Health Technol Assess. 2005; 9:iii–iv.
Article
44. Aronsson M, Svennberg E, Rosenqvist M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for untreated atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG recording. Europace. 2015; 17:1023–1029.
Article
45. Levin LA, Husberg M, Sobocinski PD, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for silent atrial fibrillation after ischaemic stroke. Europace. 2015; 17:207–214.
Article
46. Son MK, Lim NK, Park HY. Trend of prevalence of atrial fibrillation and use of oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in South Korea (2002–2013). J Epidemiol. 2018; 28:81–87.
Article
47. Engdahl J, Andersson L, Mirskaya M, Rosenqvist M. Stepwise screening of atrial fibrillation in a 75-year-old population: implications for stroke prevention. Circulation. 2013; 127:930–937.
48. Halcox JP, Wareham K, Cardew A, et al. Assessment of Remote Heart Rhythm Sampling Using the AliveCor Heart Monitor to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: the REHEARSE-AF Study. Circulation. 2017; 136:1784–1794.
49. Chan NY, Choy CC, Chan CK, Siu CW. Effectiveness of a nongovernmental organization-led large-scale community atrial fibrillation screening program using the smartphone electrocardiogram: an observational cohort study. Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15:1306–1311.
Article
50. Healey JS, Alings M, Ha A, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation in older patients. Circulation. 2017; 136:1276–1283.
Article
51. Glotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, et al. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation. 2003; 107:1614–1619.
52. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:120–129.
Article
53. Van Gelder IC, Healey JS, Crijns HJ, et al. Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:1339–1344.
Article
54. Hindricks G, Pokushalov E, Urban L, et al. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: results of the XPECT trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3:141–147.
Article
55. Brambatti M, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation. 2014; 129:2094–2099.
Article
56. Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, Wyse DG, et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2:474–480.
57. Santini M, Gasparini M, Landolina M, et al. Device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias predict adverse outcome in real-world patients with implantable biventricular defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:167–172.
Article
58. Boriani G, Glotzer TV, Santini M, et al. Device-detected atrial fibrillation and risk for stroke: an analysis of >10,000 patients from the SOS AF project (Stroke preventiOn Strategies based on Atrial Fibrillation information from implanted devices). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:508–516.
59. Freedman B, Potpara TS, Lip GY. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 2016; 388:806–817.
Article
60. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lindgren A, Terént A, Norrving B, Asplund K. High prevalence of atrial fibrillation among patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014; 45:2599–2605.
Article
61. Perera KS, Vanassche T, Bosch J, et al. Global survey of the frequency of atrial fibrillation-associated stroke: embolic stroke of undetermined source global registry. Stroke. 2016; 47:2197–2202.
62. Sposato LA, Cipriano LE, Saposnik G, Ruíz Vargas E, Riccio PM, Hachinski V. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14:377–387.
Article
63. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24:35–41.
Article
64. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:2467–2477.
65. Thijs VN, Brachmann J, Morillo CA, et al. Predictors for atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke: results from CRYSTAL AF. Neurology. 2016; 86:261–269.
66. Proietti M, Romiti GF, Olshansky B, Lane DA, Lip GY. Improved outcomes by integrated care of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation using the simple ABC (Atrial Fibrillation Better Care) pathway. Am J Med. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
Article
67. Guha K, McDonagh T. Heart failure epidemiology: European perspective. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013; 9:123–127.
Article
68. Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015; 386:154–162.
Article
69. Lip GY, Heinzel FR, Gaita F, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Failure Association joint consensus document on arrhythmias in heart failure, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2016; 18:12–36.
Article
70. Schneider MP, Hua TA, Böhm M, Wachtell K, Kjeldsen SE, Schmieder RE. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by Renin-Angiotensin system inhibition a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:2299–2307.
71. Healey JS, Baranchuk A, Crystal E, et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:1832–1839.
Article
72. Jibrini MB, Molnar J, Arora RR. Prevention of atrial fibrillation by way of abrogation of the renin-angiotensin system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ther. 2008; 15:36–43.
Article
73. Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H, et al. Efficacy of β blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014; 384:2235–2243.
Article
74. Swedberg K, Zannad F, McMurray JJ, et al. Eplerenone and atrial fibrillation in mild systolic heart failure: results from the EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization And SurvIval Study in Heart Failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59:1598–1603.
75. Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:417–427.
Article
76. Manolis AJ, Rosei EA, Coca A, et al. Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: diagnostic approach, prevention and treatment. Position paper of the Working Group ‘Hypertension Arrhythmias and Thrombosis’ of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012; 30:239–252.
77. Kim D, Yang PS, Kim TH, et al. Ideal blood pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72:1233–1245.
Article
78. Marott SC, Nielsen SF, Benn M, Nordestgaard BG. Antihypertensive treatment and risk of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide study. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:1205–1214.
Article
79. Wachtell K, Lehto M, Gerdts E, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:712–719.
Article
80. Madrid AH, Bueno MG, Rebollo JM, et al. Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study. Circulation. 2002; 106:331–336.
Article
81. Ueng KC, Tsai TP, Yu WC, et al. Use of enalapril to facilitate sinus rhythm maintenance after external cardioversion of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Results of a prospective and controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:2090–2098.
Article
82. Anand K, Mooss AN, Hee TT, Mohiuddin SM. Meta-analysis: inhibition of renin-angiotensin system prevents new-onset atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2006; 152:217–222.
Article
83. Du X, Ninomiya T, de Galan B, et al. Risks of cardiovascular events and effects of routine blood pressure lowering among patients with type 2 diabetes and atrial fibrillation: results of the ADVANCE study. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30:1128–1135.
Article
84. Schoen T, Pradhan AD, Albert CM, Conen D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:1421–1428.
Article
85. Rizzo MR, Sasso FC, Marfella R, et al. Autonomic dysfunction is associated with brief episodes of atrial fibrillation in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2015; 29:88–92.
Article
86. Ziolo MT, Mohler PJ. Defining the role of oxidative stress in atrial fibrillation and diabetes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26:223–225.
Article
87. Fatemi O, Yuriditsky E, Tsioufis C, et al. Impact of intensive glycemic control on the incidence of atrial fibrillation and associated cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study). Am J Cardiol. 2014; 114:1217–1222.
Article
88. Fangel MV, Nielsen PB, Larsen TB, et al. Type 1 versus type 2 diabetes and thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 268:137–142.
Article
89. Lee SR, Choi EK, Rhee TM, et al. Evaluation of the association between diabetic retinopathy and the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 223:953–957.
Article
90. Lip GY. The ABC pathway: an integrated approach to improve AF management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017; 14:627–628.
Article
91. Mazurek M, Shantsila E, Lane DA, Wolff A, Proietti M, Lip GY. Guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment improves outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the community-based Darlington atrial fibrillation registry. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017; 92:1203–1213.
92. Proietti M, Nobili A, Raparelli V, et al. Adherence to antithrombotic therapy guidelines improves mortality among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the REPOSI study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016; 105:912–920.
Article
93. Ancedy Y, Lecoq C, Saint Etienne C, et al. Antithrombotic management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stent implantation: what is the impact of guideline adherence? Int J Cardiol. 2016; 203:987–994.
Article
94. Gorin L, Fauchier L, Nonin E, Charbonnier B, Babuty D, Lip GY. Prognosis and guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: implications of undertreatment and overtreatment in real-life clinical practice; the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project. Chest. 2011; 140:911–917.
95. Nuño R, Coleman K, Bengoa R, Sauto R. Integrated care for chronic conditions: the contribution of the ICCC Framework. Health Policy. 2012; 105:55–64.
Article
96. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002; 288:1775–1779.
Article
97. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26:1–7.
Article
98. Alonso-Coello P, Montori VM, Solà I, et al. Values and preferences in oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, physicians' and patients' perspectives: protocol for a two-phase study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:221.
Article
99. Seaburg L, Hess EP, Coylewright M, Ting HH, McLeod CJ, Montori VM. Shared decision making in atrial fibrillation: where we are and where we should be going. Circulation. 2014; 129:704–710.
100. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012; 344:e256.
Article
101. Hendriks JM, de Wit R, Vrijhoef HJ, Tieleman RG, Crijns HJ. An integrated chronic care program for patients with atrial fibrillation: study protocol and methodology for an ongoing prospective randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47:1310–1316.
102. Guo Y, Chen Y, Lane DA, Liu L, Wang Y, Lip GY. Mobile health technology for atrial fibrillation management integrating decision support, education, and patient involvement: mAF App Trial. Am J Med. 2017; 130:1388–1396.e6.
Article
103. Lee SS, Ae Kong K, Kim D, et al. Clinical implication of an impaired fasting glucose and prehypertension related to new onset atrial fibrillation in a healthy Asian population without underlying disease: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:2599–2607.
Article
104. Baek YS, Yang PS, Kim TH, et al. Associations of abdominal obesity and new-onset atrial fibrillation in the general population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6:6.
Article
105. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994; 271:840–844.
Article
106. Wang TJ, Parise H, Levy D, et al. Obesity and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2004; 292:2471–2477.
Article
107. Gami AS, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49:565–571.
Article
108. Heeringa J, Kors JA, Hofman A, van Rooij FJ, Witteman JC. Cigarette smoking and risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam Study. Am Heart J. 2008; 156:1163–1169.
Article
109. Conen D, Tedrow UB, Cook NR, Moorthy MV, Buring JE, Albert CM. Alcohol consumption and risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women. JAMA. 2008; 300:2489–2496.
Article
110. Roh SY, Choi JI, Lee JY, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic lung disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4:815–822.
Article
111. Kong KA, Park J, Hong SH, Hong YS, Sung YA, Lee H. Associations between body mass index and mortality or cardiovascular events in a general Korean population. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0185024.
Article
112. Manning WJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:817–822.
Article
113. Hwang JJ, Chen JJ, Lin SC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for detecting left atrial thrombi in patients with rheumatic heart disease having undergone mitral valve operations. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72:677–681.
114. Lip G, Freedman B, De Caterina R, Potpara TS. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: past, present and future. Comparing the guidelines and practical decision-making. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117:1230–1239.
115. Kim TH, Shim CY, Park JH, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is associated with atrial remodeling and risk or presence of stroke in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2016; 68:104–109.
Article
116. Yu HT, Yang PS, Lee H, et al. Outcomes of rate-control treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a nationwide cohort study. Circ J. 2018; 82:652–658.
117. Nieuwlaat R, Olsson SB, Lip GY, et al. Guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment is associated with improved outcomes compared with undertreatment in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2007; 153:1006–1012.
118. Stock S, Pitcavage JM, Simic D, et al. Chronic care model strategies in the United States and Germany deliver patient-centered, high-quality diabetes care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33:1540–1548.
Article
119. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146:857–867.
Article
120. Eckman MH, Singer DE, Rosand J, Greenberg SM. Moving the tipping point: the decision to anticoagulate patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4:14–21.
121. Chiang CE, Wang TD, Li YH, et al. 2010 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the management of hypertension. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010; 109:740–773.
Article
122. Olesen JB, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen ML, Lip GY. The value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score 0–1: a nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2012; 107:1172–1179.
123. Coppens M, Eikelboom JW, Hart RG, et al. The CHA2DS2-VASc score identifies those patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score of 1 who are unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:170–176.
124. Chao TF, Liu CJ, Wang KL, et al. Using the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in ‘low-risk’ Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64:1658–1665.
125. Kim TH, Yang PS, Kim D, et al. CHA2DS2-VASc score for identifying truly low-risk atrial fibrillation for stroke: a Korean nationwide cohort study. Stroke. 2017; 48:2984–2990.
126. Kang SH, Choi EK, Han KD, et al. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation not receiving oral anticoagulants: Korean nationwide population-based study. Circ J. 2017; 81:1158–1164.
127. Lin LY, Lee CH, Yu CC, et al. Risk factors and incidence of ischemic stroke in Taiwanese with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-- a nation wide database analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2011; 217:292–295.
128. Steensig K, Olesen KK, Thim T, et al. Coronary artery disease is independent risk factor for stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
129. Wang TJ, Massaro JM, Levy D, et al. A risk score for predicting stroke or death in individuals with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 2003; 290:1049–1056.
Article
130. Fang MC, Singer DE, Chang Y, et al. Gender differences in the risk of ischemic stroke and peripheral embolism in atrial fibrillation: the AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Circulation. 2005; 112:1687–1691.
131. Avgil Tsadok M, Jackevicius CA, Rahme E, Humphries KH, Behlouli H, Pilote L. Sex differences in stroke risk among older patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2012; 307:1952–1958.
Article
132. Friberg L, Benson L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY. Assessment of female sex as a risk factor in atrial fibrillation in Sweden: nationwide retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e3522.
Article
133. Mikkelsen AP, Lindhardsen J, Lip GY, Gislason GH, Torp-Pedersen C, Olesen JB. Female sex as a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10:1745–1751.
Article
134. Nielsen PB, Skjøth F, Overvad TF, Larsen TB, Lip GY. Female sex is a risk modifier rather than a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: should we use a CHA2DS2-VA score rather than CHA2DS2-VASc? Circulation. 2018; 137:832–840.
135. Siu CW, Lip GY, Lam KF, Tse HF. Risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in 9727 Chinese with atrial fibrillation in Hong Kong. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11:1401–1408.
Article
136. Guo Y, Apostolakis S, Blann AD, et al. Validation of contemporary stroke and bleeding risk stratification scores in non-anticoagulated Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:904–909.
Article
137. Tomita H, Okumura K, Inoue H, et al. Validation of risk scoring system excluding female sex from CHA2DS2-VASc in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM registry. Circ J. 2015; 79:1719–1726.
138. Chao TF, Wang KL, Liu CJ, et al. Age threshold for increased stroke risk among patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study from Taiwan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66:1339–1347.
139. Kim TH, Yang PS, Yu HT, et al. Age threshold for ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2018; 49:1872–1879.
Article
140. Zulkifly H, Lip GY, Lane DA. Use of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to predict anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: a review. Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15:615–623.
141. Yoon M, Yang PS, Jang E, et al. Dynamic changes of CHA2DS2-VASc score and the risk of ischaemic stroke in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118:1296–1304.
142. Chao TF, Lip GY, Liu CJ, et al. Relationship of aging and incident comorbidities to stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71:122–132.
143. Chao TF, Lip GY, Lin YJ, et al. Incident risk factors and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: a comparison of baseline, follow-up and delta HAS-BLED scores with an approach focused on modifiable bleeding risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118:768–777.
Article
144. Lip GY, Wang KL, Chiang CE. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: time for a reappraisal. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 180:246–254.
Article
145. Cha MJ, Choi EK, Han KD, et al. Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2017; 48:3040–3048.
Article
146. Cho MY, Park J, Kim Y, et al. Clinical effectiveness and safety of standard-dose and low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Heart Rhythm. 2017.
147. Lip GY, Clemens A, Noack H, Ferreira J, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S. Patient outcomes using the European label for dabigatran. A post-hoc analysis from the RE-LY database. Thromb Haemost. 2014; 111:933–942.
148. Chan NC, Coppens M, Hirsh J, et al. Real-world variability in dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Haemost. 2015; 13:353–359.
Article
149. Li CH, Liu CJ, Chou AY, et al. European Society of Cardiology guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment and risk of mortality in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:30734.
Article
150. Kim H, Kim TH, Cha MJ, et al. A prospective survey of atrial fibrillation management for real-world guideline adherence: COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of Atrial Fibrillation (CODE-AF) Registry. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:877–887.
Article
151. Lee SR, Choi EK, Han KD, Cha MJ, Oh S, Lip GY. Temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in Korean patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0189495.
Article
152. Lip GY, Lane DA. Bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: observations on the use and misuse of bleeding risk scores. J Thromb Haemost. 2016; 14:1711–1714.
Article
153. Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Kaatz S, et al. Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:823–833.
Article
154. Douketis JD, Hasselblad V, Ortel TL. Bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374:93–94.
Article
155. Man-Son-Hing M, Nichol G, Lau A, Laupacis A. Choosing antithrombotic therapy for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for falls. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:677–685.
Article
156. Guo Y, Zhu H, Chen Y, Lip GY. Comparing bleeding risk assessment focused on modifiable risk factors only versus validated bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2018; 131:185–192.
Article
157. Chao TF, Lip GY, Lin YJ, et al. Major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation: attention to modifiable bleeding risk factors or use of a bleeding risk stratification score? A nationwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 254:157–161.
Article
158. Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Shantsila A, Roldán V, Lip GY, Marín F. Assessing bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients: comparing a bleeding risk score based only on modifiable bleeding risk factors against the HAS-BLED score. The AMADEUS trial. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117:2261–2266.
Article
159. Zulkifly H, Lip GY, Lane DA. Bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Am J Cardiol. 2017; 120:1139–1145.
Article
160. Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64:1–12.
161. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009; 374:534–542.
Article
162. Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-year follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Circulation. 2013; 127:720–729.
163. Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 312:1988–1998.
164. Holmes DR Jr, Doshi SK, Kar S, et al. Left atrial appendage closure as an alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a patient-level meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65:2614–2623.
165. Boersma LV, Schmidt B, Betts TR, et al. Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37:2465–2474.
Article
166. Badheka AO, Chothani A, Mehta K, et al. Utilization and adverse outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the United States: influence of hospital volume. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8:42–48.
167. Casu G, Gulizia MM, Molon G, et al. ANMCO/AIAC/SICI-GISE/SIC/SICCH consensus document: percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: indications, patient selection, staff skills, organisation, and training. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017; 19:D333–D353.
Article
168. Whitlock R, Healey J, Vincent J, et al. Rationale and design of the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 3:45–54.
169. Schreck DM, Rivera AR, Tricarico VJ. Emergency management of atrial fibrillation and flutter: intravenous diltiazem versus intravenous digoxin. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29:135–140.
Article
170. Siu CW, Lau CP, Lee WL, Lam KF, Tse HF. Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37:2174–2179.
Article
171. Tisdale JE, Padhi ID, Goldberg AD, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous diltiazem and digoxin for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J. 1998; 135:739–747.
Article
172. Scheuermeyer FX, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, et al. Safety and efficiency of calcium channel blockers versus beta-blockers for rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and no acute underlying medical illness. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20:222–230.
Article
173. Platia EV, Michelson EL, Porterfield JK, Das G. Esmolol versus verapamil in the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 63:925–929.
Article
174. Ellenbogen KA, Dias VC, Plumb VJ, Heywood JT, Mirvis DM. A placebo-controlled trial of continuous intravenous diltiazem infusion for 24-hour heart rate control during atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18:891–897.
Article
175. Steinberg JS, Katz RJ, Bren GB, Buff LA, Varghese PJ. Efficacy of oral diltiazem to control ventricular response in chronic atrial fibrillation at rest and during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 9:405–411.
Article
176. Goldstein RE, Boccuzzi SJ, Cruess D, Nattel S. Diltiazem increases late-onset congestive heart failure in postinfarction patients with early reduction in ejection fraction. The Adverse Experience Committee; and the Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Research Group. Circulation. 1991; 83:52–60.
Article
177. Darby AE, Dimarco JP. Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease. Circulation. 2012; 125:945–957.
Article
178. Clemo HF, Wood MA, Gilligan DM, Ellenbogen KA. Intravenous amiodarone for acute heart rate control in the critically ill patient with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81:594–598.
Article
179. Delle Karth G, Geppert A, Neunteufl T, et al. Amiodarone versus diltiazem for rate control in critically ill patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29:1149–1153.
Article
180. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1363–1373.
Article
181. Al-Khatib SM, Allen LaPointe NM, Chatterjee R, et al. Rate- and rhythm-control therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160:760–773.
182. Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2667–2677.
183. Kirchhof P, Andresen D, Bosch R, et al. Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial. Lancet. 2012; 380:238–246.
Article
184. Lafuente-Lafuente C, Valembois L, Bergmann JF, Belmin J. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (3):CD005049.
Article
185. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1825–1833.
Article
186. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1834–1840.
Article
187. Opolski G, Torbicki A, Kosior DA, et al. Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) Study. Chest. 2004; 126:476–486.
188. Chatterjee S, Sardar P, Lichstein E, Mukherjee D, Aikat S. Pharmacologic rate versus rhythm-control strategies in atrial fibrillation: an updated comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013; 36:122–133.
Article
189. de Denus S, Sanoski CA, Carlsson J, Opolski G, Spinler SA. Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165:258–262.
190. Kotecha D, Kirchhof P. Rate and rhythm control have comparable effects on mortality and stroke in atrial fibrillation but better data are needed. Evid Based Med. 2014; 19:222–223.
Article
191. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010; 303:333–340.
192. Arbelo E, Brugada J, Hindricks G, et al. The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: a European survey on methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:1466–1478.
193. Anselmino M, Matta M, D'Ascenzo F, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7:1011–1018.
194. Kirchhof P, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, et al. Improving outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial. Am Heart J. 2013; 166:442–448.
Article
195. Shi LZ, Heng R, Liu SM, Leng FY. Effect of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp Ther Med. 2015; 10:816–822.
Article
196. Choi YJ, Kang KW, Kim TH, et al. Comparison of rhythm and rate control strategies for stroke occurrence in a prospective cohort of atrial fibrillation patients. Yonsei Med J. 2018; 59:258–264.
Article
197. Kirchhof P, Mönnig G, Wasmer K, et al. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA). Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:1292–1297.
Article
198. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks. Circulation. 2000; 101:1282–1287.
199. Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Loh P, et al. Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 360:1275–1279.
Article
200. Furniss SS, Sneyd JR. Safe sedation in modern cardiological practice. Heart. 2015; 101:1526–1530.
Article
201. Bianconi L, Mennuni M, Lukic V, Castro A, Chieffi M, Santini M. Effects of oral propafenone administration before electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28:700–706.
Article
202. Singh SN, Tang XC, Reda D, Singh BN. Systematic electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation and role of antiarrhythmic drugs: a substudy of the SAFE-T trial. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6:152–155.
Article
203. Channer KS, Birchall A, Steeds RP, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-treatment and short- or long-term maintenance therapy with amiodarone supporting DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25:144–150.
Article
204. Hemels ME, Van Noord T, Crijns HJ, et al. Verapamil versus digoxin and acute versus routine serial cardioversion for the improvement of rhythm control for persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1001–1009.
Article
205. Villani GQ, Piepoli MF, Terracciano C, Capucci A. Effects of diltiazem pretreatment on direct-current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study. Am Heart J. 2000; 140:e12.
Article
206. De Simone A, Stabile G, Vitale DF, et al. Pretreatment with verapamil in patients with persistent or chronic atrial fibrillation who underwent electrical cardioversion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34:810–814.
Article
207. The Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation (DAAF) Trial Group. Intravenous digoxin in acute atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre trial in 239 patients. Eur Heart J. 1997; 18:649–654.
208. Atarashi H, Inoue H, Fukunami M, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of aprindine and digoxin for the prevention of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2002; 66:553–556.
Article
209. Schädlich PK, Schmidt-Lucke C, Huppertz E, et al. Economic evaluation of enoxaparin for anticoagulation in early cardioversion of persisting nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a statutory health insurance perspective from Germany. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007; 7:199–217.
210. Schmidt-Lucke C, Paar WD, Stellbrink C, et al. Quality of anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin plus phenprocoumon for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in cardioversion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Sub-analysis from the Anticoagulation in Cardioversion using Enoxaparin (ACE) trial. Thromb Res. 2007; 119:27–34.
Article
211. Stellbrink C, Nixdorff U, Hofmann T, et al. Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants for prevention of thromboembolic complications in cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Anticoagulation in Cardioversion using Enoxaparin (ACE) trial. Circulation. 2004; 109:997–1003.
Article
212. Shin DG, Cho I, Hartaigh B, et al. Cardiovascular events of electrical cardioversion under optimal anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: the multicenter analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56:1552–1558.
Article
213. Hansen ML, Jepsen RM, Olesen JB, et al. Thromboembolic risk in 16 274 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing direct current cardioversion with and without oral anticoagulant therapy. Europace. 2015; 17:18–23.
Article
214. Gwag HB, Chun KJ, Hwang JK, et al. Which antiarrhythmic drug to choose after electrical cardioversion: a study on non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0197352.
Article
215. Khan IA. Oral loading single dose flecainide for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2003; 87:121–128.
Article
216. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, Cucherat M, Kirkorian G, Touboul P. Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41:255–262.
Article
217. Letelier LM, Udol K, Ena J, Weaver B, Guyatt GH. Effectiveness of amiodarone for conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163:777–785.
218. Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Gowda RM. Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2003; 89:239–248.
Article
219. Thomas SP, Guy D, Wallace E, et al. Rapid loading of sotalol or amiodarone for management of recent onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, digoxin-controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2004; 147:E3.
Article
220. Vijayalakshmi K, Whittaker VJ, Sutton A, et al. A randomized trial of prophylactic antiarrhythmic agents (amiodarone and sotalol) in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom direct current cardioversion is planned. Am Heart J. 2006; 151:863.e1–863.e6.
Article
221. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ, et al. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:1861–1872.
Article
222. Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation. 2008; 117:1518–1525.
223. Kowey PR, Dorian P, Mitchell LB, et al. Vernakalant hydrochloride for the rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2:652–659.
224. Camm AJ, Capucci A, Hohnloser SH, et al. A randomized active-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of vernakalant to amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:313–321.
Article
225. Bash LD, Buono JL, Davies GM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cardioversion by vernakalant and comparators in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2012; 26:167–179.
Article
226. Reisinger J, Gatterer E, Lang W, et al. Flecainide versus ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of recent onset. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25:1318–1324.
Article
227. Stambler BS, Wood MA, Ellenbogen KA, Perry KT, Wakefield LK, VanderLugt JT. Efficacy and safety of repeated intravenous doses of ibutilide for rapid conversion of atrial flutter or fibrillation. Ibutilide Repeat Dose Study Investigators. Circulation. 1996; 94:1613–1621.
228. Reisinger J, Gatterer E, Heinze G, et al. Prospective comparison of flecainide versus sotalol for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81:1450–1454.
Article
229. Mun HS, Shen C, Pak HN, et al. Chronic amiodarone therapy impairs the function of the superior sinoatrial node in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2013; 77:2255–2263.
Article
230. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N, et al. Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:2384–2391.
Article
231. Saborido CM, Hockenhull J, Bagust A, Boland A, Dickson R, Todd D. Systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation of ‘pill-in-the-pocket’ strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to episodic in-hospital treatment or continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Health Technol Assess. 2010; 14:iii–iv.
Article
232. Lau DH, Nattel S, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Modifiable risk factors and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017; 136:583–596.
Article
233. Van Gelder IC, Crijns HJ, Van Gilst WH, Van Wijk LM, Hamer HP, Lie KI. Efficacy and safety of flecainide acetate in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64:1317–1321.
Article
234. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:781–788.
235. Chimienti M, Cullen MT Jr, Casadei G. Safety of flecainide versus propafenone for the long-term management of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Report from the Flecainide and Propafenone Italian Study (FAPIS) Group. Eur Heart J. 1995; 16:1943–1951.
236. Kim DS, Koh CW, Cho HK, et al. Comparision of the efficacy of propafenone and flecainide in patients with atrial fibrillation. Korean Circ J. 1997; 27:860–866.
237. Aliot E, Capucci A, Crijns HJ, Goette A, Tamargo J. Twenty-five years in the making: flecainide is safe and effective for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011; 13:161–173.
Article
238. Freemantle N, Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mitchell S, Eckert L, Reynolds M. Mixed treatment comparison of dronedarone, amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, and propafenone, for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011; 13:329–345.
Article
239. Chun KJ, Byeon K, Im SI, et al. Efficacy of dronedarone versus propafenone in the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Clin Ther. 2014; 36:1169–1175.
Article
240. Singh SN, Fletcher RD, Fisher SG, et al. Amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:77–82.
241. Kirchhof P, Franz MR, Bardai A, Wilde AM. Giant T–U waves precede torsades de pointes in long QT syndrome: a systematic electrocardiographic analysis in patients with acquired and congenital QT prolongation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:143–149.
242. Goldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli GV, et al. A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4:1250–1259.
Article
243. Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, et al. Dronedarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:987–999.
Article
244. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:668–678.
Article
245. Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, McMurray JJ, et al. Increased mortality after dronedarone therapy for severe heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2678–2687.
Article
246. Connolly SJ, Camm AJ, Halperin JL, et al. Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2268–2276.
Article
247. Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, et al. Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:913–920.
Article
248. Klein AL, Grimm RA, Murray RD, et al. Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:1411–1420.
Article
249. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation. 2011; 123:131–136.
250. Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y, et al. Outcomes after cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:1998–2006.
Article
251. Flaker G, Lopes RD, Al-Khatib SM, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban in patients after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63:1082–1087.
252. Cappato R, Ezekowitz MD, Klein AL, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:3346–3355.
Article
253. Goette A, Merino JL, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Edoxaban versus enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2016; 388:1995–2003.
Article
254. Ezekowitz MD, Pollack CV Jr, Halperin JL, et al. Apixaban compared to heparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion: the EMANATE trial. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:2959–2971.
Article
255. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:1330–1393.
256. Lip GYH, Collet JP, Haude M, et al. 2018 Joint European consensus document on the management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA). Europace. 2018; [Epub ahead of print].
257. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1665–1671.
Article
258. ACTIVE Writing Group of the ACTIVE Investigators. Connolly S, Pogue J, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006; 367:1903–1912.
259. Dewilde WJ, Oirbans T, Verheugt FW, et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 381:1107–1115.
Article
260. Rubboli A, Faxon DP, Juhani Airaksinen KE, et al. The optimal management of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting. The 10th anniversary overview. Thromb Haemost. 2014; 112:1080–1087.
261. Choi HI, Ahn JM, Kang SH, et al. Prevalence, management, and long-term (6-year) outcomes of atrial fibrillation among patients receiving drug-eluting coronary stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10:1075–1085.
262. Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:1513–1524.
Article
263. Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:2423–2434.
Article
264. Golwala HB, Cannon CP, Steg PG, et al. Safety and efficacy of dual vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:1726–1735a.
Article
265. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1139–1151.
Article
266. Lopes RD, Vora AN, Liaw D, et al. An open-Label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist and aspirin vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the AUGUSTUS trial. Am Heart J. 2018; 200:17–23.
Article
267. Vranckx P, Lewalter T, Valgimigli M, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of an edoxaban-based antithrombotic regimen in patients with atrial fibrillation following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement: Rationale and design of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial. Am Heart J. 2018; 196:105–112.
Article
268. Lamberts M, Gislason GH, Lip GY, et al. Antiplatelet therapy for stable coronary artery disease in atrial fibrillation patients taking an oral anticoagulant: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2014; 129:1577–1585.
269. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:213–260.
270. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14:e275–444.
271. Hohnloser SH, Camm AJ. Safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of the literature. Europace. 2013; 15:1407–1411.
Article
272. Di Biase L, Lakkireddy D, Trivedi C, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban administration in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12:1162–1168.
Article
273. Lakkireddy D, Reddy YM, Di Biase L, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63:982–988.
274. Kottmaier M, Bourier F, Pausch H, et al. Safety of uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban versus phenprocoumon for patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2018; 121:445–449.
Article
275. Cappato R, Marchlinski FE, Hohnloser SH, et al. Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:1805–1811.
Article
276. Calkins H, Willems S, Gerstenfeld EP, et al. Uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin for ablation in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376:1627–1636.
Article
277. Kirchhof P, Haeusler KG, Blank B, et al. Apixaban in patients at risk of stroke undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:2942–2955.
Article
278. Fox KA, Piccini JP, Wojdyla D, et al. Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:2387–2394.
279. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Gao P, et al. Stroke risk and efficacy of apixaban in atrial fibrillation patients with moderate chronic kidney disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 21:429–435.
Article
280. Hohnloser SH, Hijazi Z, Thomas L, et al. Efficacy of apixaban when compared with warfarin in relation to renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2821–2830.
Article
281. Hijazi Z, Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis. Circulation. 2014; 129:961–970.
282. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Asinger RW, Herzog CA. Warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with moderate chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 6:2599–2604.
Article
283. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 383:955–962.
Article
284. Del-Carpio Munoz F, Gharacholou SM, Munger TM, et al. Meta-analysis of renal function on the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117:69–75.
Article
285. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015; 17:1467–1507.
Article
286. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:883–891.
Article
287. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:981–992.
288. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:2093–2104.
Article
289. Wizemann V, Tong L, Satayathum S, et al. Atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients: clinical features and associations with anticoagulant therapy. Kidney Int. 2010; 77:1098–1106.
Article
290. Chan KE, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R, Hakim RM. Warfarin use associates with increased risk for stroke in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20:2223–2233.
Article
291. Winkelmayer WC, Liu J, Setoguchi S, Choudhry NK. Effectiveness and safety of warfarin initiation in older hemodialysis patients with incident atrial fibrillation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 6:2662–2668.
Article
292. Schwartzenberg S, Lev EI, Sagie A, Korzets A, Kornowski R. The quandary of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117:477–482.
Article
293. Potpara TS, Ferro CJ, Lip GY. Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018; 14:337–351.
Article
294. Siontis KC, Zhang X, Eckard A, et al. Outcomes associated with apixaban use in end-stage kidney disease patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 2018; 138:1519–1529.
Article
295. Lee SR, Choi EK, Han KD, Jung JH, Oh S, Lip GY. Edoxaban in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: effectiveness and safety. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72:838–853.
296. Yu HY, Kim P, Jang TH, et al. Impact of renal function on outcomes with edoxaban in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Stroke. 2018; 49:2421–2429.
297. Hylek EM, D'Antonio J, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S. Translating the results of randomized trials into clinical practice: the challenge of warfarin candidacy among hospitalized elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2006; 37:1075–1080.
298. Sharma M, Cornelius VR, Patel JP, Davies JG, Molokhia M. Efficacy and harms of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2015; 132:194–204.
299. Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 370:493–503.
Article
300. Gage BF, Birman-Deych E, Kerzner R, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS, Rich MW. Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation who are prone to fall. Am J Med. 2005; 118:612–617.
Article
301. Chao TF, Liu CJ, Lin YJ, et al. Oral anticoagulation in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2018; 138:37–47.
302. Yamashita Y, Hamatani Y, Esato M, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in extreme elderly (age ≥ 85 years) Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: the Fushimi AF registry. Chest. 2016; 149:401–412.
303. Halvorsen S, Atar D, Yang H, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to age for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:1864–1872.
Article
304. Hori M, Matsumoto M, Tanahashi N, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in relation to age. Circ J. 2014; 78:1349–1356.
Article
305. Lin YC, Chien SC, Hsieh YC, et al. Effectiveness and safety of standard- and low-dose rivaroxaban in Asians with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72:477–485.
306. Joung B. Real-world data and recommended dosage of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for Korean patients. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:833–841.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr