Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr.  2016 Dec;19(4):221-228. 10.5223/pghn.2016.19.4.221.

Microbiome-Linked Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Exposome towards Host Health and Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Mucosal Exposome and Biomodulation, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea. moon@pnu.edu
  • 2Research Institute for Basic Sciences and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  • 3Immunoregulatory Therapeutics Group in Brain Busan 21 Project, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

The gastrointestinal exposome represents the integration of all xenobiotic components and host-derived endogenous components affecting the host health, disease progression and ultimately clinical outcomes during the lifespan. The human gut microbiome as a dynamic exposome of commensalism continuously interacts with other exogenous exposome as well as host sentineling components including the immune and neuroendocrine circuit. The composition and diversity of the microbiome are established on the basis of the luminal environment (physical, chemical and biological exposome) and host surveillance at each part of the gastrointestinal lining. Whereas the chemical exposome derived from nutrients and other xenobiotics can influence the dynamics of microbiome community (the stability, diversity, or resilience), the microbiomes reciprocally alter the bioavailability and activities of the chemical exposome in the mucosa. In particular, xenobiotic metabolites by the gut microbial enzymes can be either beneficial or detrimental to the host health although xenobiotics can alter the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome. The integration of the mucosal crosstalk in the exposome determines the fate of microbiome community and host response to the etiologic factors of disease. Therefore, the network between microbiome and other mucosal exposome would provide new insights into the clinical intervention against the mucosal or systemic disorders via regulation of the gut-associated immunological, metabolic, or neuroendocrine system.

Keyword

Gastrointestinal exposome; Microbiota; Gastrointestinal immunity and inflammation; Xenobiotic metabolism

MeSH Terms

Biological Availability
Disease Progression
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
Microbiota
Mucous Membrane
Neurosecretory Systems
Phenobarbital
Symbiosis
Xenobiotics
Phenobarbital
Xenobiotics

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Schematic networks of gastrointestinal niche. Mucosal xenobiotics are converted into beneficial or harmful metabolites by both host cells and gut microbes, which reciprocally influces the microbial community and host cell integrity. Gut microbes are continuously interplaying with the host sentinels such as immune and neuroendocrine systems.


Reference

1. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011; 473:174–180.
Article
2. Koren O, Knights D, Gonzalez A, Waldron L, Segata N, Knight R, et al. A guide to enterotypes across the human body: meta-analysis of microbial community structures in human microbiome datasets. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9:e1002863.
Article
3. Raymond F, Ouameur AA, Déraspe M, Iqbal N, Gingras H, Dridi B, et al. The initial state of the human gut microbiome determines its reshaping by antibiotics. ISME J. 2016; 10:707–720.
Article
4. Kang C, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Liu K, Wang X, Chen M, et al. Healthy subjects differentially respond to dietary capsaicin correlating with specific gut enterotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 101:4681–4689.
Article
5. Gibson MK, Pesesky MW, Dantas G. The yin and yang of bacterial resilience in the human gut microbiota. J Mol Biol. 2014; 426:3866–3876.
Article
6. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012; 489:220–230.
Article
7. Fiocchi C. Towards a ‘cure’ for IBD. Dig Dis. 2012; 30:428–433.
Article
8. Fiocchi C. Integrating omics: the future of IBD? Dig Dis. 2014; 32:Suppl 1. 96–102.
Article
9. Hildebrandt MA, Hoffmann C, Sherrill-Mix SA, Keilbaugh SA, Hamady M, Chen YY, et al. High-fat diet determines the composition of the murine gut microbiome independently of obesity. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137:1716–1724. e1-2.
Article
10. Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH, Webster LM, Holtrop G, Ze X, et al. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J. 2011; 5:220–230.
Article
11. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14:20–32.
Article
12. Fava F, Danese S. Intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: friend of foe? World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17:557–566.
Article
13. Scharl M, Rogler G. Microbial sensing by the intestinal epithelium in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Inflam. 2010; 2010:671258.
Article
14. Scanlan PD, Shanahan F, O'Mahony C, Marchesi JR. Culture-independent analyses of temporal variation of the dominant fecal microbiota and targeted bacterial subgroups in Crohn's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44:3980–3988.
Article
15. Sepehri S, Kotlowski R, Bernstein CN, Krause DO. Microbial diversity of inflamed and noninflamed gut biopsy tissues in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007; 13:675–683.
Article
16. Abreu MT, Arnold ET, Thomas LS, Gonsky R, Zhou Y, Hu B, et al. TLR4 and MD-2 expression is regulated by immune-mediated signals in human intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:20431–20437.
Article
17. Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Bohm J, Zentek J. Decontamination and detoxification strategies for the Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in animal feed and the effectiveness of microbial biodegradation. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010; 27:510–520.
Article
18. Yu H, Zhou T, Gong J, Young C, Su X, Li XZ, et al. Isolation of deoxynivalenol-transforming bacteria from the chicken intestines using the approach of PCRDGGE guided microbial selection. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10:182.
Article
19. Tenk I, Fodor E, Szathmáry C. The effect of pure Fusarium toxins (T-2, F-2, DAS) on the microflora of the gut and on plasma glucocorticoid levels in rat and swine. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1982; 252:384–393.
Article
20. Waché YJ, Valat C, Postollec G, Bougeard S, Burel C, Oswald IP, et al. Impact of deoxynivalenol on the intestinal microflora of pigs. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 10:1–17.
Article
21. Bezirtzoglou EE. Intestinal cytochromes P450 regulating the intestinal microbiota and its probiotic profile. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2012; 23:10. DOI: 10.3402/mehd.v23io.18370.
Article
22. Lei L, Waterman MR, Fulco AJ, Kelly SL, Lamb DC. Availability of specific reductases controls the temporal activity of the cytochrome P450 complement of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101:494–499.
Article
23. Sperry JF, Wilkins TD. Presence of cytochrome c in Desulfomonas pigra. J Bacteriol. 1977; 129:554–555.
Article
24. den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013; 54:2325–2340.
Article
25. Hamer HM, Jonkers D, Venema K, Vanhoutvin S, Troost FJ, Brummer RJ. Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 27:104–119.
Article
26. Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Fermentation in the human large intestine: its physiologic consequences and the potential contribution of prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45:Suppl. S120–S127.
27. Schilderink R, Verseijden C, de Jonge WJ. Dietary inhibitors of histone deacetylases in intestinal immunity and homeostasis. Front Immunol. 2013; 4:226.
Article
28. Schilderink R, Verseijden C, Seppen J, Muncan V, van den Brink GR, Lambers TT, et al. The SCFA butyrate stimulates the epithelial production of retinoic acid via inhibition of epithelial HDAC. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016; 310:G1138–G1146.
Article
29. Tong X, Yin L, Giardina C. Butyrate suppresses Cox-2 activation in colon cancer cells through HDAC inhibition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 317:463–471.
Article
30. Thorburn AN, Macia L, Mackay CR. Diet, metabolites, and “western-lifestyle” inflammatory diseases. Immunity. 2014; 40:833–842.
Article
31. Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, Jury J, et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141:599–609. 609.e1–609.e3.
Article
32. Duca FA, Lam TK. Gut microbiota, nutrient sensing and energy balance. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:Suppl 1. 68–76.
Article
33. Paul HA, Bomhof MR, Vogel HJ, Reimer RA. Diet-induced changes in maternal gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles influence programming of offspring obesity risk in rats. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20683.
Article
34. Reid DT, Eller LK, Nettleton JE, Reimer RA. Postnatal prebiotic fibre intake mitigates some detrimental metabolic outcomes of early overnutrition in rats. Eur J Nutr. 2016; 55:2399–2409.
Article
35. Yang J, Summanen PH, Henning SM, Hsu M, Lam H, Huang J, et al. Xylooligosaccharide supplementation alters gut bacteria in both healthy and prediabetic adults: a pilot study. Front Physiol. 2015; 6:216.
Article
36. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Food, immunity, and the microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148:1107–1119.
Article
37. Zelante T, Iannitti RG, Cunha C, De Luca A, Giovannini G, Pieraccini G, et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013; 39:372–385.
Article
38. Ikuta T, Kurosumi M, Yatsuoka T, Nishimura Y. Tissue distribution of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the intestine: Implication of putative roles in tumor suppression. Exp Cell Res. 2016; 343:126–134.
Article
39. Esser C, Rannug A. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in barrier organ physiology, immunology, and toxicology. Pharmacol Rev. 2015; 67:259–279.
Article
40. Murray IA, Patterson AD, Perdew GH. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014; 14:801–814.
Article
41. Hartiala J, Bennett BJ, Tang WH, Wang Z, Stewart AF, Roberts R, et al. Comparative genome-wide association studies in mice and humans for trimethylamine N-oxide, a proatherogenic metabolite of choline and L-carnitine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014; 34:1307–1313.
Article
42. Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011; 472:57–63.
Article
43. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013; 19:576–585.
Article
44. Bernstein C, Holubec H, Bhattacharyya AK, Nguyen H, Payne CM, Zaitlin B, et al. Carcinogenicity of deoxycholate, a secondary bile acid. Arch Toxicol. 2011; 85:863–871.
Article
45. Saracut C, Molnar C, Russu C, Todoran N, Vlase L, Turdean S, et al. Secondary bile acids effects in colon pathology. Experimental mice study. Acta Cir Bras. 2015; 30:624–631.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PGHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr