Clin Endosc.  2016 Jul;49(4):318-326. 10.5946/ce.2016.087.

Oroesophageal Fish Bone Foreign Body

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea. kimhup@jejunu.ac.kr

Abstract

Fish bone foreign body (FFB) is the most frequent food-associated foreign body (FB) in adults, especially in Asia, versus meat in Western countries. The esophageal sphincter is the most common lodging site. Esophageal FB disease tends to occur more frequently in men than in women. The first diagnostic method is laryngoscopic examination. Because simple radiography of the neck has low sensitivity, if perforation or severe complications requiring surgery are expected, computed tomography should be used. The risk factors associated with poor prognosis are long time lapse after FB involvement, bone type, and longer FB (>3 cm). Bleeding and perforation are more common in FFB disease than in other FB diseases. Esophageal FB disease requires urgent treatment within 24 hours. However, FFB disease needs emergent treatment, preferably within 2 hours, and definitely within 6 hours. Esophageal FFB disease usually occurs at the physiological stricture of the esophagus. The aortic arch eminence is the second physiological stricture. If the FB penetrates the esophageal wall, a life-threatening aortoesophageal fistula can develop. Therefore, it is better to consult a thoracic surgeon prior to endoscopic removal.

Keyword

Seafood; Bone and bones; Foreign bodies; Esophagus; Pharynx

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aorta, Thoracic
Asia
Bone and Bones
Constriction, Pathologic
Esophagus
Female
Fistula
Foreign Bodies*
Hemorrhage
Humans
Male
Meat
Methods
Neck
Pharynx
Prognosis
Radiography
Risk Factors
Seafood

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Complicated case of esophageal fish bone foreign body (FFB) of a 43-year-old man who had alcoholic liver cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis and had complained of back pain since 3 days before. (A) Endoscopic photography shows a typical damselfish (“Jari ” in Korean) FFB near the aortic arch eminence. There was no evidence of an aortic arch injury on the first computed tomography (CT). During endoscopy, the FFB impacting one side of the esophageal wall was removed using foreign body forceps and the penetrated hole was sutured using a hemoclip. Approximately a 2.5-cm length of typical “anal fin spine-pterygiophore complex ” FFB was removed successfully. On the second hospital day, fever and dyspnea were aggravated. On the follow-up CT, pneumomediastinitis with abscess formation was seen (B, cross-section; C, coronal section; D, sagittal section). Note that free air and inflammatory material extended up to the retronasopharyngeal space. The patient transferred to the surgical ward and underwent surgery on hospital day 3. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on hospital day 30.

  • Fig. 2. A typical case of upper esophageal fish bone foreign body (FFB) disease in a 62-year-old woman complaining odynophagia after eating a fish (Lateolabrax japonicus) 1 day before. (A) On the neck lateral X-ray (NLX) and (B) its magnified view, about 3 cm of linear opacity was seen. (C) The FFB was removed using cap-fitted endoscopy. In cases of upper esophageal FFB above the thoracic inlet, a simple NLX is a useful single modality to diagnose the FFB disease prior to do endoscopic examination without need to check computed tomography. Arrows denote FFB.

  • Fig. 3. Neck lateral X-ray (NLX) and computed tomography (CT) to identify fish bone foreign bodies (FFBs). (A) Hypopharyngeal FFB. (B) Cervical esophageal FFB. (C) Thoracic esophageal FFB. The hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal FFB are well detected on the NLX. However, below the thoracic inlet, only CT can detect the FFBs. Arrows denote FFBs.

  • Fig. 4. (A-F) Serial endoscopic photos of removal of the esophageal flat fish bone foreign body (FFB) using an overtube. Many esophageal FFB are flat, large, and have a sharp polygonal edge. For this reason, esophageal laceration can be evoked during FFB retrieval, especially upper esophageal sphincter. Using an overtube not only protects the upper esophageal mucosa from laceration but also helps protect the airway from aspiration.

  • Fig. 5. Usefulness of cap-fitted endoscopy in the collapsed pharyngeal space. A linear fish bone foreign body (FFB) is totally imbedded in the right vallecula on computed tomography (A). Serial photos to find, expose, and remove the imbedded FFB (B). The naked endoscopic tip cannot approach and visualized the collapsed space. The cap-fitted endoscopy is useful not only visualize the collapsed mucosa but also detect and expose the imbedded FFB by sweeping mucosa with the edge of the cap. Cap also makes the sufficient space to operate the forcep to remove the FFB in the collapsed space.


Cited by  1 articles

Esophageal Foreign Body: Treatment and Complications
Sun-Jin Boo, Heung Up Kim
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2018;72(1):1-5.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2018.72.1.1.


Reference

1. Kamath P, Bhojwani KM, Prasannaraj T, Abhijith K. Foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract: a clinical study of cases in the coastal belt of South India. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006; 27:373–377.
2. Park JH, Park CH, Park JH, et al. Review of 209 cases of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract and clinical factors for successful endoscopic removal. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004; 43:226–233.
3. Moon JS, Kim YH, Song TJ, Ryu HS, Hyun JH. The foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract diagnosed by endoscopy. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 10:305–315.
4. Lee MS, Ra DJ, Kim JH, Cho SW, Shim CS. A review of the endoscopic extraction in 52 cases of the upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 10:47–52.
5. Webb WA. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 41:39–51.
Article
6. Hachimi-Idrissi S, Corne L, Vandenplas Y. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood: our experience and review of the literature. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998; 5:319–323.
7. Park SM, Chung MS, Choi JY, et al. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies: review of 118 cases. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1999; 33:464–472.
8. Blaho KE, Merigian KS, Winbery SL, Park LJ, Cockrell M. Foreign body ingestions in the Emergency Department: case reports and review of treatment. J Emerg Med. 1998; 16:21–26.
Article
9. Kamal I, Thompson J, Paquette DM. The hazards of vinyl glove ingestion in the mentally retarded patient with pica: new implications for surgical management. Can J Surg. 1999; 42:201–204.
10. Abdullah BJ, Teong LK, Mahadevan J, Jalaludin A. Dental prosthesis ingested and impacted in the esophagus and orolaryngopharynx. J Otolaryngol. 1998; 27:190–194.
11. Longstreth GF, Longstreth KJ, Yao JF. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53:193–198.
Article
12. Nandi P, Ong GB. Foreign body in the oesophagus: review of 2394 cases. Br J Surg. 1978; 65:5–9.
Article
13. Ono J. Foreign bodies in air and food passages in the Japanese. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965; 81:416–420.
Article
14. Lai AT, Chow TL, Lee DT, Kwok SP. Risk factors predicting the development of complications after foreign body ingestion. Br J Surg. 2003; 90:1531–1535.
Article
15. Carp L. Foreign bodies in the intestine. Ann Surg. 1927; 85:575–591.
Article
16. Dray X, Cattan P. Foreign bodies and caustic lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013; 27:679–689.
Article
17. Pfau PR. Removal and management of esophageal foreign bodies. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 16:32–39.
Article
18. Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH, et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:489–496.
Article
19. Palta R, Sahota A, Bemarki A, Salama P, Simpson N, Laine L. Foreign-body ingestion: characteristics and outcomes in a lower socioeconomic population with predominantly intentional ingestion. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 1):426–433.
Article
20. Weiland ST, Schurr MJ. Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6:496–500.
Article
21. Schwartz GF, Polsky HS. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg. 1976; 42:236–238.
22. Zhang S, Cui Y, Gong X, Gu F, Chen M, Zhong B. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in South China: a retrospective study of 561 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55:1305–1312.
Article
23. Park SJ, Jeon SM, Shin HD, et al. Risk factors for severe complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies. Korean J Med. 2015; 89:537–547.
Article
24. Kim HJ, Lee OJ, Min HJ, et al. Endoscopic treatment of esophageal foreign bodies in adult: management of 257 cases. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 29:51–57.
25. Park YK, Kim KO, Yang JH, Lee SH, Jang BI. Factors associated with development of complications after endoscopic foreign body removal. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19:230–234.
Article
26. Kim HU, Song HJ. Clinical characteristics of an esophageal fish bone foreign body from Chromis notata. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27:1208–1214.
27. Kim HU, Song HJ, Choi EK, Cho YK, Song BC. A case of a pharyngeal impacted fish bone foreign body detected by finger palpation. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 42:228–231.
28. Lee KS, Lee SH, Suh IS, Kim EH, Choi YW, Lee YU. Review of 78 cases foreign body in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1998; 31:598–604.
29. Kim JP, Kwon OJ, Shim HS, Kim RB, Kim JH, Woo SH. Analysis of clinical feature and management of fish bone ingestion of upper gastrointestinal tract. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 8:261–267.
Article
30. Chung H, Kwak YH, Kim DK, Jung JY, Lee JH, Kim HB. Usefulness of plain radiographs for management of suspected fishbone impaction in digestive tract of children. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2012; 23:537–542.
31. Kim JE, Ryoo SM, Kim YJ, et al. Incidence and clinical features of esophageal perforation caused by ingested foreign body. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015; 66:255–260.
Article
32. Sheth N, Diner WC. Swallowing problems in the elderly. Dysphagia. 1988; 2:209–215.
Article
33. Evans RM, Ahuja A, Rhys Williams S, Van Hasselt CA. The lateral neck radiograph in suspected impacted fish bones: does it have a role? Clin Radiol. 1992; 46:121–123.
34. Gautam V, Phillips J, Bowmer H, Reichl M. Foreign body in the throat. J Accid Emerg Med. 1994; 11:113–115.
Article
35. Ginsberg GG. Management of ingested foreign objects and food bolus impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 41:33–38.
Article
36. Mosca S, Manes G, Martino R, et al. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: report on a series of 414 adult patients. Endoscopy. 2001; 33:692–696.
Article
37. Sugawa C, Ono H, Taleb M, Lucas CE. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 6:475–481.
Article
38. Telford JJ. Management of ingested foreign bodies. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005; 19:599–601.
Article
39. Connolly AA, Birchall M, Walsh-Waring GP, Moore-Gillon V. Ingested foreign bodies: patient-guided localization is a useful clinical tool. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992; 17:520–524.
Article
40. Luk WH, Fan WC, Chan RY, Chan SW, Tse KH, Chan JC. Foreign body ingestion: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography versus endoscopy. J Laryngol Otol. 2009; 123:535–540.
Article
41. Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, Knoefel WT. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109:869–875.
Article
42. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:1085–1091.
Article
43. Ritchie T, Harvey M. The utility of plain radiography in assessment of upper aerodigestive tract fishbone impaction: an evaluation of 22 New Zealand fish species. N Z Med J. 2010; 123:32–37.
44. Ngan JH, Fok PJ, Lai EC, Branicki FJ, Wong J. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion. Experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg. 1990; 211:459–462.
45. Wu IS, Ho TL, Chang CC, Lee HS, Chen MK. Value of lateral neck radiography for ingested foreign bodies using the likelihood ratio. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 37:292–296.
46. Shihada R, Goldsher M, Sbait S, Luntz M. Three-dimensional computed tomography for detection and management of ingested foreign bodies. Ear Nose Throat J. 2009; 88:910–911.
Article
47. Liew CJ, Poh AC, Tan TY. Finding nemo: imaging findings, pitfalls, and complications of ingested fish bones in the alimentary canal. Emerg Radiol. 2013; 20:311–322.
Article
48. Marco De Lucas E, Sádaba P, Lastra García-Barón P, et al. Value of helical computed tomography in the management of upper esophageal foreign bodies. Acta Radiol. 2004; 45:369–374.
Article
49. Goh BK, Tan YM, Lin SE, et al. CT in the preoperative diagnosis of fish bone perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187:710–714.
Article
50. Young CA, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Prasad SR. CT features of esophageal emergencies. Radiographics. 2008; 28:1541–1553.
Article
51. Takada M, Kashiwagi R, Sakane M, Tabata F, Kuroda Y. 3D-CT diagnosis for ingested foreign bodies. Am J Emerg Med. 2000; 18:192–193.
Article
52. Foley MJ, Ghahremani GG, Rogers LF. Reappraisal of contrast media used to detect upper gastrointestinal perforations: comparison of ionic water-soluble media with barium sulfate. Radiology. 1982; 144:231–237.
Article
53. Loh KS, Tan LK, Smith JD, Yeoh KH, Dong F. Complications of foreign bodies in the esophagus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123:613–616.
Article
54. Chaikhouni A, Kratz JM, Crawford FA. Foreign bodies of the esophagus. Am Surg. 1985; 51:173–179.
55. Gmeiner D, von Rahden BH, Meco C, Hutter J, Oberascher G, Stein HJ. Flexible versus rigid endoscopy for treatment of foreign body impaction in the esophagus. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:2026–2029.
Article
56. Tan S, Tan S, Peng M, Yu F. Management of an ingested fish bone in the lung using video-assist thoracic surgery: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e943.
57. Li ZS, Sun ZX, Zou DW, Xu GM, Wu RP, Liao Z. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper-GI tract: experience with 1088 cases in China. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64:485–492.
Article
58. Zhang S, Wang J, Wang J, Zhong B, Chen M, Cui Y. Transparent cap-assisted endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper esophagus: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28:1339–1342.
Article
59. Lee JS, Chun HJ, Lee JM, et al. Salvage technique for endoscopic removal of a sharp fish bone impacted in the esophagus using a transparent cap and detachable snares. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013; 61:215–218.
Article
60. Singh B, Kantu M, Har-El G, Lucente FE. Complications associated with 327 foreign bodies of the pharynx, larynx, and esophagus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997; 106:301–304.
Article
61. Hokama A, Uechi K, Takeshima E, et al. A fish bone perforation of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 2014; 46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E216–E217.
Article
62. Jeon SH, Han DC, Lee SG, Park HM, Shin DJ, Lee YB. Eikenella corrodens cervical spinal epidural abscess induced by a fish bone. J Korean Med Sci. 2007; 22:380–382.
Article
63. Wei Y, Jahreiß L, Zhang Z, Albers AE. Acute airway obstruction due to retropharyngeal haematoma caused by a large fish bone in a patient with hypertension caused by a pheochromocytoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015:bcr2014208644.
Article
64. Sinha R, Sen I, Saha J, Mukherjee A, Guha R. Migration of a fish bone from the upper aerodigestive tract to the skin of the neck: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2013; 92:E15.
Article
65. Aslan M, Çelik Y, Dülger AC, et al. Submucosal hematoma of the esophagus due to fish bone ingestion. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014; 25 Suppl 1:302–303.
Article
66. Kim HG, Kim BH, Lim DJ, Kang SH. A case of removal of esophageal foreign body causing esophageal submucosal hematoma. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2007; 50:958–960.
67. Wu HC, Hsia JY, Hsu CP. Esophageal laceration with intramural dissection mimics esophageal perforation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008; 7:864–865.
Article
68. Shim CS, Lee MS, Cho JY, et al. Esophagus, stomach & intestine: a case of tracheoesophageal fistula caused by fish bone induced trauma with complete healing by using the fibrinogen: thrombin glue. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 17:49–54.
69. Mukhopadhyay B, Tripathy BB, Saha S, Shukla RM, Saha SR, et al. Acquired tracheo-oesophageal fistula: a case report. J Indian Med Assoc. 2008; 106:806–808.
70. Pan S, Chai Y, Shen G. Recurrent pneumonia caused by a migrated esophageal foreign body. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 61:513–515.
Article
71. Matsuda E, Okabe K, Takahagi A, et al. Pulmonary abscess caused by fish bone. Kyobu Geka. 2013; 66:219–222.
72. Kim YS, Lee SW, Kang SB, Nam SW, Lee DS, Park K. Esophageal perforation and empyema after fish bone swallowing. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 34:320–323.
73. Kim KM, Jang AS, Kim SW, et al. A case of acute mediastinitis associated with fish bone with successful conservative treatment. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2002; 53:344–348.
Article
74. Choi EK, Kwon KH, Choi YW, Oh SK, Jeong JW, Park YK. A case of acute purulent pericarditis with pericardial performation by esophageal foreign body. J Korean Soc Echocardiogr. 2000; 8:247–251.
Article
75. Liang H, Xu Z, Feng Q, Ma L. Recurrent cerebral embolism secondary to esophageal and atrial foreign body complicated by infective endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148:e213–e214.
Article
76. Blanco Ramos M, Rivo Vázquez JE, García-Fontán E, Amoedo TO. Systemic air embolism in a patient with ingestion of a foreign body. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009; 8:292–294.
Article
77. Kunishige H, Myojin K, Ishibashi Y, Ishii K, Kawasaki M, Oka J. Perforation of the esophagus by a fish bone leading to an infected pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 56:427–429.
Article
78. Macchi V, Porzionato A, Bardini R, Parenti A, De Caro R. Rupture of ascending aorta secondary to esophageal perforation by fish bone. J Forensic Sci. 2008; 53:1181–1184.
Article
79. Sauer BM, Staritz M, Perdekamp MG. Lethal bleeding after accidental swallowing of a wooden meat skewer. Z Gastroenterol. 2009; 47:749–752.
80. Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, et al. Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist. 2014; 7:183–197.
81. Sung HY, Lee IS, Kim SI, et al. Clinical features of abdominal actinomycosis: a 15-year experience of a single institute. J Korean Med Sci. 2011; 26:932–937.
Article
82. Kikuchi K, Tsurumaru D, Hiraka K, Komori M, Fujita N, Honda H. Unusual presentation of an esophageal foreign body granuloma caused by a fish bone: usefulness of multidetector computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol. 2011; 29:63–66.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr