Korean J Urol.  2009 Nov;50(11):1138-1143.

Comparison of the Testicular Salvage Rate according to Treatment Method in Scrotal Trauma

• Lee HS
• Kim TB
• Kim KH
• Jung H
• Yoon SJ

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the testicular salvage rate, visual analogue pain scale, and hospital stay according to treatment method in patients with scrotal trauma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 103 patients who visited the emergency department with scrotal trauma between January 1996 and February 2009. Treatment methods for scrotal trauma were divided into four groups (total orchiectomy, partial orchiectomy, simple suture, and conservative treatment) for patients with testicular rupture and two groups (exploration and hematoma evacuation, conservative treatment) for patients with scrotal hematoma. We analyzed the testicular salvage rate, visual analogue pain scale, and hospital stay of each group.
RESULTS
The study included 58 patients with testicular rupture and 45 patients with a scrotal hematoma. The patients' mean age was 26.8 years, and most cases occurred during the second decade of life. The main cause of scrotal trauma was assault, which included 41 cases (39.8%). Immediate surgical intervention for testicular rupture improved the testicular salvage rate, reduced the duration of hospital stay, and was associated with less pain. For patients who underwent partial orchiectomy and conservative management, the length of hospital stay and the reported pain were greater than for patients who had total orchiectomy and simple suturing. In addition, the testicular salvage rate in patients who underwent a partial orchiectomy or conservative management was lower than in cases with simple suturing. For scrotal hematoma, the testicular salvage rate in patients who underwent exploration and hematoma evacuation was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
Because the testicular rupture patients treated by partial orchiectomy showed worse results than did the patients treated by other methods, a patient's status such as age, marital status, and number of children need to be carefully considered before a decision is made to perform a partial orchiectomy. For scrotal hematoma, patients treated by exploration and hematoma evacuation exhibited a higher testicular salvage rate than did patients treated with conservative management.

Keyword

Testis; Scrotum; Wounds and injuries; Pain

MeSH Terms

Child
Emergencies
Hematoma
Humans
Length of Stay
Marital Status
Medical Records
Orchiectomy
Pain Measurement
Retrospective Studies
Rupture
Scrotum
Sutures
Testis

Reference

1. Buckley JC, McAninch JW. Diagnosis and management of testicular ruptures. Urol Clin North Am. 2006. 33:111–116.

2. Altarac S. Management of 53 cases of testicular trauma. Eur Urol. 1994. 25:119–123.

3. Cass AS. Testicular trauma. J Urol. 1983. 129:299–300.

4. Cass AS, Luxenberg M. Value of early operation in blunt testicular contusion with hematocele. J Urol. 1988. 139:746–747.

5. Lee SH, Bak CW, Choi MH, Lee HS, Lee MS, Yoon SJ. Trauma to male genital organs: a 10-year review of 156 patients, including 118 treated by surgery. BJU Int. 2008. 101:211–215.

6. Dougaard G, Petersen HD, Abildgaard U, Marcussen H, Wallach M, Jess P, et al. Sequelae to genital trauma in torture victims. Arch Androl. 1983. 10:245–248.

7. Sakamoto Y, Matsumoto T, Mizunoe Y, Haraoka M, Sakumoto M, Kumazawa J. Testicular injury induces cell-mediated autoimmune response to testis. J Urol. 1995. 153:1316–1320.

8. Cohen HL, Shapiro ML, Haller JO, Glassberg K. Sonography of intrascrotal hematomas simulating testicular rupture in adolescents. Pediatr Radiol. 1992. 22:296–297.

9. Cass AS, Luxenberg M. Testicular injuries. Urology. 1991. 37:528–530.

10. Micallef M, Ahmad I, Ramesh N, Hurley M, McInerney D. Ultrasound features of blunt testicular injury. Injury. 2001. 32:23–26.

11. Lee DH, Suh HJ, Nam BH. Importance of early exploration in blunt scrotal trauma. Korean J Urol. 1997. 38:808–813.

12. Bandi G, Santucci RA. Controversies in the management of male external genitourinary trauma. J Trauma. 2004. 56:1362–1370.

13. Anderson KA, McAninch JW, Jeffrey RB, Laing FC. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis and staging of blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol. 1983. 130:933–935.

14. Deurdulian C, Mittelstaedt CA, Chong WK, Fielding JR. US of acute scrotal trauma: optimal technique, imaging findings, and management. Radiographics. 2007. 27:357–369.

15. Kim SH, Park S, Choi SH, Jeong WK, Choi JH. Significant predictors for determination of testicular rupture on sonography: a prospective study. J Ultrasound Med. 2007. 26:1649–1655.

16. Kim SH, Park S, Choi SH, Jeong WK, Choi JH. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of testicular rupture: a prospective preliminary study. J Trauma. 2009. 66:239–242.

17. Del Villar RG, Ireland GW, Cass AS. Early exploration following trauma to the testicle. J Trauma. 1973. 13:600–601.

18. Schuster G. Traumatic rupture of the testicle and a review of the literature. J Urol. 1982. 127:1194–1196.

19. Buckley JC, McAninch JW. Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol. 2006. 175:175–178.

20. Park JS, Lee SJ. Testicular injuries-efficacy of the organ injury scale developed by the American association for the surgery of trauma. Korean J Urol. 2007. 48:61–65.

21. Davis BE, Noble MJ, Weigel JW, Foret JD, Mebust WK. Analysis and management of chronic testicular pain. J Urol. 1990. 143:936–939.