1). Povazay B, Hermann B, Unterhuber A, et al. Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography at 1050 nm versus 800 nm in retinal pathologies: enhanced performance and choroidal penetration in cataract patients. J Biomed Opt. 2007; 12:041211.
2). Chen Y, Burnes DL, Bruin M, et al. Three-dimensional pointwise comparison of human retinal optical property at 845 and 1060 nm using optical frequency domain imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2009; 14:024016.
3). Lee EC, Mujat M, et al. In vivo optical frequency domain imaging of human retina and choroid. Opt Express. 2006; 14:4403–11.
Article
4). Hirata M, Tsujikawa A, Matsumoto A, et al. Macular choroidal thickness and volume in normal subjects measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:4971–8.
Article
5). Yasuno Y, Hong Y, Makita S, et al. In vivo high-contrast imaging of deep posterior eye by 1-microm swept source optical coherence tomography and scattering optical coherence angiography. Opt Express. 2007; 15:6121–39.
6). Ching HY, Wong AC, Wong CC, et al. Cystoid macular oedema and changes in retinal thickness after phacoemulsification with optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond). 2006; 20:297–303.
Article
7). van Velthoven ME, van der Linden MH, de Smet MD, et al. Influence of cataract on optical coherence tomography image quality and retinal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:1259–62.
Article
8). Kok PH, Dijk HW, et al. The relationship between the optical density of cataract and its influence on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013; 91:418–24.
Article
9). Stein DM, Ishikawa H, Hariprasad R, et al. A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:186–90.
Article
10). Liu S, Paranjape AS, Elmaanaoui B, et al. Quality assessment for spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2009; 7171:71710X.
Article
11). Huang Y, Gangaputra S, Lee KE, et al. Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:2133–41.
Article
12). Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 150:815–24.
Article
13). Geitzenauer W, Kiss CG, Durbin MK, et al. Comparing retinal thickness measurements from Cirrus spectral domain- and Stratus time domain-optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2010; 30:596–606.
Article
14). van Velthoven ME, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD, et al. Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007; 26:57–77.
Article
15). Kok PH, van Dijk HW, van den Berg TJ, Verbraak FD. A model for the effect of disturbances in the optical media on the OCT image quality. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:787–92.
Article
16). Unterhuber A, Povazay B, Hermann B, et al. In vivo retinal optical coherence tomography at 1040 nm - enhanced penetration into the choroid. Opt Express. 2005; 13:3252–8.
Article
17). Povazay B, Bizheva K, Hermann B, et al. Enhanced visualization of choroidal vessels using ultrahigh resolution ophthalmic OCT at 1050 nm. Opt Express. 2003; 11:1980–6.
Article
18). Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B, et al. Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51:5260–6.
Article
19). Ikuno Y, Kawaguchi K, Nouchi T, Yasuno Y. Choroidal thickness in healthy Japanese subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51:2173–6.
Article
20). Mwanza JC, Bhorade AM, Sekhon N, et al. Effect of cataract and its removal on signal strength and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography measurements. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20:37–43.
Article