Lab Med Online.  2021 Apr;11(2):115-123. 10.47429/lmo.2021.11.2.115.

Revised World Health Organization Criteria-Defined Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Large Cohort: Highlighting the Frequency and Characterization of Recategorized Cases

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Application of the 2016 revised WHO criteria for categorization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) highlights certain discrepancies from that of the 2008 WHO criteria. We thus analyzed the frequency, categorization patterns, and features of discrepant cases, and characterized the AML subtypes that had undergone major changes under the revised criteria.
Methods
We divided the patients into the following seven categories based on the previous and the revised WHO criteria: AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (RGA), AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC), therapy-related AML, AML not otherwise specified (NOS), AML associated with Down syndrome, AML with subcategory not determined, and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Results
In total, 1,185 AML cases were reviewed. The concordance rate in categorization between the two criteria was 93.4%. Among 78 discrepant cases, the three most common discrepancy patterns were for the RGA to NOS, MRC to MDS, and MRC to RGA, representing cases with a single mutation in CEBPA, erythroleukemia, and recurrent genetic abnormalities showing myelodysplasia, respectively. We identified three cases of erythroleukemia harboring an NPM1 mutation, who might clinically benefit from chemotherapy rather than MDS-oriented treatment; we also found AML with del(9q) in 3% of patients, which might contribute to leukemogenesis either via haploinsufficiency of deleted genes or gene-togene interaction.
Conclusions
This study revealed that approximately 7% of patients with AML were reclassified into a different category due to the introduction of new entities, changed definitions, and refined subcategorization. Therefore, further refinement should be considered during the next revision.

Keyword

Acute myeloid leukemia; WHO classification; Revised; Recategorization; Myelodysplastic syndrome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of categorization based on the previous and revised WHO criteria. Categories based on the previous 2008 WHO criteria are shown on the left, and categories based on the revised 2016 WHO criteria are shown on the right. The gradient colors represent the diagnostic categories and the widths of the bands are proportional to the counts of cases in each category based on the previous and revised criteria. Abbreviations: RGA, AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities; MRC, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes; NOS, AML not otherwise specified; TR, therapy-related AML; ND, AML with subcategory not determined; DS, AML associated with Down syndrome.

  • Fig. 2 Pattern and frequency of categorization in AML patients with (A) NPM1 mutation, (B) CEBPAbi mutation, (C) del(9q), and (D) erythroleukemia. The black-brimmed pieces indicate a discrepancy and non-brimmed pieces indicate an agreement. There may be overlapping cases in each patient group. Abbreviations: RGA, AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities; MRC, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes; NOS, AML not otherwise specified; TR, therapy-related AML; ND, AML with subcategory not determined; CEBPAbi, biallelic CEBPA.

  • Fig. 3 Influence of MDS history on the outcomes of patients with AML harboring gene mutations identified in the MRC to RGA recategorization. Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival according to the defining criteria for the MRC category using the 2008 WHO criteria, including multilineage dysplasia or del(9q) (N=9) and a prior history of MDS or MDS/MPN (N=6). Abbreviations: MRC, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes; RGA, AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities; MDS/MPN, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm.


Reference

1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, editors. 2017. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Revised 4th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer;Lyon, France: p. 129–71.
2. Leonard JP, Martin P, Roboz GJ. 2017; Practical implications of the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 35:2708–15. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6745. PMID: 28654364.
Article
3. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. 2016; The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 127:2391–405. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. PMID: 27069254.
Article
4. Chen Y, Pourabdollah M, Atenafu EG, Tierens A, Schimmer A, Chang H. 2017; Re-evaluation of acute erythroid leukemia according to the 2016 WHO classification. Leuk Res. 61:39–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.08.011. PMID: 28886412.
Article
5. Toth LN, de Abreu FB, Peterson JD, Loo EY. 2018; Impact of molecular sequencing information as related to 2008 and 2016 World Health Organization classification of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 142:1017. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0577-LE. PMID: 30141999.
Article
6. Margolskee E, Mikita G, Rea B, Bagg A, Zuo Z, Sun Y, et al. 2018; A reevaluation of erythroid predominance in acute myeloid leukemia using the updated WHO 2016 criteria. Mod Pathol. 31:873–80. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0001-2. PMID: 29403082.
Article
7. Ryu S, Park HS, Kim SM, Im K, Kim JA, Hwang SM, et al. 2018; Shifting of erythroleukemia to myelodysplastic syndrome according to the revised WHO classification: biologic and cytogenetic features of shifted erythroleukemia. Leuk Res. 70:13–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.04.015. PMID: 29729583.
Article
8. Jung J, Cho BS, Kim HJ, Han E, Jang W, Han K, et al. 2019; Reclassification of acute myeloid leukemia according to the 2016 WHO classification. Ann Lab Med. 39:311–6. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.311. PMID: 30623623. PMCID: PMC6340847.
Article
9. Kansal R. 2019; Classi cation of acute myeloid leukemia by the revised fourth edition World Health Organization criteria: a retrospective single-institution study with appraisal of the new entities of acute myeloid leukemia with gene mutations in NPM1 and biallelic CEBPA. Hum Pathol. 90:80–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.04.020. PMID: 31077683.
10. Huang Q, Chen W, Gaal KK, Slovak ML, Stein A, Weiss LM. 2008; A rapid, one step assay for simultaneous detection of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 mutations in AML with normal cytogenetics. Br J Haematol. 142:489–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07205.x. PMID: 18477048.
11. Falini B, Mecucci C, Tiacci E, Alcalay M, Rosati R, Pasqualucci L, et al. 2005; Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N Engl J Med. 352:254–66. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041974. PMID: 15659725.
Article
12. Wouters BJ, Löwenberg B, Erpelinck-Verschueren CA, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, Delwel R. 2009; Double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, define a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with a distinctive gene expression profile that is uniquely associated with a favorable outcome. Blood. 113:3088–91. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-179895. PMID: 19171880. PMCID: PMC2662648.
Article
13. Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, et al. 2017; Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 129:424–47. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. PMID: 27895058. PMCID: PMC5291965.
Article
14. McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, editors. 2016. An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature (2016). S. Karger Publishers, Inc.;Unionville, CT:
15. Bhatt VR, Akhtari M, Bociek RG, Sanmann JN, Yuan J, Dave BJ, et al. 2014; Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 12:963–8. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0092. PMID: 24994916.
Article
16. Konoplev S, Yin CC, Kornblau SM, Kantarjian HM, Konopleva M, Andreeff M, et al. 2013; Molecular characterization of de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 54:138–44. DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.701739. PMID: 22691121. PMCID: PMC3925981.
17. Schnittger S, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Alpermann T, Dicker F, Sundermann J, et al. 2011; Characterization of NPM1-mutated AML with a history of myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia. 25:615–21. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.299. PMID: 21233837.
Article
18. Lin P, Falini B. 2015; Acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities other than translocations. Am J Clin Pathol. 144:19–28. DOI: 10.1309/AJCP97BJBEVZEUIN. PMID: 26071459.
Article
19. Peniket A, Wainscoat J, Side L, Daly S, Kusec R, Buck G, et al. 2005; Del (9q) AML: clinical and cytological characteristics and prognostic implications. Br J Haematol. 129:210–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05445.x. PMID: 15813849.
Article
20. Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Krauter J, Thiede C, Ehninger G, Haase D, et al. 2005; Acute myeloid leukemia with deletion 9q within a noncomplex karyotype is associated with CEBPA loss-of-function mutations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 42:427–32. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20152. PMID: 15645492.
21. Sweetser DA, Peniket AJ, Haaland C, Blomberg AA, Zhang Y, Zaidi ST, et al. 2005; Delineation of the minimal commonly deleted segment and identification of candidate tumor-suppressor genes in del(9q) acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 44:279–91. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20236. PMID: 16015647.
Article
22. Dayyani F, Wang J, Yeh JR, Ahn EY, Tobey E, Zhang DE, et al. 2008; Loss of TLE1 and TLE4 from the del(9q) commonly deleted region in AML cooperates with AML1-ETO to affect myeloid cell proliferation and survival. Blood. 111:4338–47. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-103291. PMID: 18258796. PMCID: PMC2288729.
Article
23. Herold T, Metzeler KH, Vosberg S, Hartmann L, Jurinovic V, Opatz S, et al. 2017; Acute myeloid leukemia with del(9q) is characterized by frequent mutations of NPM1, DNMT3A, WT1 and low expression of TLE4. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 56:75–86. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22418. PMID: 27636548.
24. Naarmann-de Vries IS, Sackmann Y, Klein F, Ostareck-Lederer A, Ostareck DH, Jost E, et al. 2019; Characterization of acute myeloid leukemia with del(9q) - impact of the genes in the minimally deleted region. Leuk Res. 76:15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.11.007. PMID: 30476680.
Article
25. Montalban-Bravo G, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Sasaki K, Patel K, Ganan-Gomez I, Jabbour E, et al. 2019; NPM1 mutations define a specific subgroup of MDS and MDS/MPN patients with favorable outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. Blood Adv. 3:922–33. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026989. PMID: 30902805. PMCID: PMC6436014.
26. You E, Cho YU, Jang S, Seo EJ, Lee JH, Lee JH, et al. 2017; Frequency and clinicopathologic features of RUNX1 mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not otherwise specified. Am J Clin Pathol. 148:64–72. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx046. PMID: 28927163.
Full Text Links
  • LMO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr