Ann Surg Treat Res.  2019 Oct;97(4):184-193. 10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.184.

Which strategy is better for resectable synchronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, simultaneous surgery, or staged surgery? Multicenter retrospective analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. yslee@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
  • 4Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 6Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 8Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
  • 9Department of Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The optimal treatment for synchronous liver metastasis (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) depends on various factors. The present study was intended to investigate the oncologic outcome according to the time of resection of metastatic lesions.
METHODS
Data from patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for primary CRC and synchronous LM between 2004 and 2009 from 9 university hospitals in Korea were collected retrospectively. One hundred forty-three patients underwent simultaneous resection for primary CRC and synchronous LM (simultaneous surgery group), and 65 patients were treated by 2-stage operation (staged surgery group).
RESULTS
The mean follow-up length was 41.2 ± 24.6 months. In the extent of resection for hepatic metastasis, major hepatectomy was more frequently performed in staged surgery group (33.8% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001). The rate of severe complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or more was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 85.0% in staged surgery group and 69.4% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.013), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 46.4% in staged surgery group and 30.2% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.143). In subgroup analysis based on the location of primary CRC, the benefit of staged surgery for OS and RFS was clearly shown in rectal cancer (P = 0.021 and P = 0.015).
CONCLUSION
Based on our results, staged surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for resectable synchronous LM from CRC, especially in rectal cancer, as a safe and fairly promising option.

Keyword

Colorectal neoplasms; Neoplasm metastasis; Surgical oncology

MeSH Terms

Classification
Colorectal Neoplasms*
Drug Therapy
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy
Hospitals, University
Humans
Korea
Liver*
Neoplasm Metastasis*
Rectal Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A study flow diagram of this study.

  • Fig. 2 (A) The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 85.0% in the staged surgery group and 69.4% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.013); and (B) the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 46.4% in the staged surgery group and 30.2% in simultaneous surgery group (P = 0.143). The OS in staged surgery group is significantly better than in simultaneous surgery group.

  • Fig. 3 This figure shows the result of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) based on the location of primary CRC. (A) The OS in colon cancer patients was not significantly different between the staged surgery group and simultaneous surgery group (5-year OS rate: 76.6% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.295). However, (B) the OS in rectal cancer patients was significantly better in the staged surgery group than in simultaneous surgery group (5-year OS rate: 73.6% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.021). In the aspect of RFS, the results were almost the same with those for OS. (C) In colon cancer patients, RFS was not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, (D) rectal cancer patients in staged surgery group had better outcome of RFS (5-year RFS rate: 35.3% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.015).


Cited by  1 articles

Can the presence of KRAS mutations guide the type of liver resection during simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastasis?
Munseok Choi, Dai Hoon Han, Jin Sub Choi, Gi Hong Choi
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022;26(2):125-132.    doi: 10.14701/ahbps.21-127.


Reference

1. Shin A, Kim KZ, Jung KW, Park S, Won YJ, Kim J, et al. Increasing trend of colorectal cancer incidence in Korea, 1999-2009. Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 44:219–226.
Article
2. Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kornprat P, Gonen M, et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:4575–4580.
Article
3. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25 Suppl 3:iii1–iii9.
Article
4. Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK, O'Rourke T, John TG. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg. 2008; 247:125–135.
5. Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, Eng C, Sargent DJ, Larson DW, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:3677–3683.
Article
6. Martin RC 2nd, Augenstein V, Reuter NP, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM. Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208:842–850.
Article
7. Adam R, Pascal G, Castaing D, Azoulay D, Delvart V, Paule B, et al. Tumor progression while on chemotherapy: a contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases? Ann Surg. 2004; 240:1052–1061.
8. Wang Y, Wang ZQ, Wang FH, Yuan YF, Li BK, Ding PR, et al. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal l iver metastasectomy after pre-operative chemotherapy: is the treatment worthwhile? J Cancer. 2017; 8:1179–1186.
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:205–213.
10. Martin R, Paty P, Fong Y, Grace A, Cohen A, DeMatteo R, et al. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197:233–241.
Article
11. Yin Z, Liu C, Chen Y, Bai Y, Shang C, Yin R, et al. Timing of hepatectomy in resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM): Simultaneous or delayed? Hepatology. 2013; 57:2346–2357.
Article
12. Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. Survival after resection of multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2000; 231:743–751.
Article
13. Nakajima K, Takahashi S, Saito N, Kotaka M, Konishi M, Gotohda N, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16:821–827.
Article
14. Slesser AA, Simillis C, Goldin R, Brown G, Mudan S, Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing simultaneous versus delayed resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol. 2013; 22:36–47.
Article
15. Minagawa M, Yamamoto J, Miwa S, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Kosuge T, et al. Selection criteria for simultaneous resection in patients with synchronous liver metastasis. Arch Surg. 2006; 141:1006–1012.
Article
16. Mentha G, Majno PE, Andres A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Morel P, Roth AD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:872–878.
Article
17. Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Marques H, Lamelas J, Wolfgang CL, de Saussure W, et al. Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216:707–716.
Article
18. Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J, Kokudo N, Kunstlinger F, Loyer E, et al. Managing synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015; 41:729–741.
Article
19. Yoshidome H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, Kato A, Yoshitomi H, et al. Interval period tumor progression: does delayed hepatectomy detect occult metastases in synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12:1391–1398.
Article
20. Araujo R, Gonen M, Allen P, Blumgart L, DeMatteo R, Fong Y, et al. Comparison between perioperative and postoperative chemotherapy after potentially curative hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:4312–4321.
Article
21. Lehmann K, Rickenbacher A, Weber A, Pestalozzi BC, Clavien PA. Chemotherapy before liver resection of colorectal metastases: friend or foe. Ann Surg. 2012; 255:237–247.
22. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371:1007–1016.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr