Int J Stem Cells.  2019 Mar;12(1):31-42. 10.15283/ijsc18084.

Alteration of Genomic Imprinting Status of Human Parthenogenetic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells during Neural Lineage Differentiation

Affiliations
  • 1Departement of Stem Cell Biology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. knko@kku.ac.kr
  • 2Center for Stem Cell Research, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Genomic imprinting modulates growth and development in mammals and is associated with genetic disorders. Although uniparental embryonic stem cells have been used to study genomic imprinting, there is an ethical issue associated with the destruction of human embryos. In this study, to investigate the genomic imprinting status in human neurodevelopment, we used human uniparental induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that possessed only maternal alleles and differentiated into neural cell lineages.
METHODS
Human somatic iPSCs (hSiPSCs) and human parthenogenetic iPSCs (hPgiPSCs) were differentiated into neural stem cells (NSCs) and named hSi-NSCs and hPgi-NSCs respectively. DNA methylation and gene expression of imprinted genes related neurodevelopment was analyzed during reprogramming and neural lineage differentiation.
RESULTS
The DNA methylation and expression of imprinted genes were altered or maintained after differentiation into NSCs. The imprinting status in NSCs were maintained after terminal differentiation into neurons and astrocytes. In contrast, gene expression was differentially presented in a cell type-specific manner.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that genomic imprinting should be determined in each neural cell type because the genomic imprinting status can differ in a cell type-specific manner. In addition, the in vitro model established in this study would be useful for verifying the epigenetic alteration of imprinted genes which can be differentially changed during neurodevelopment in human and for screening novel imprinted genes related to neurodevelopment. Moreover, the confirmed genomic imprinting status could be used to find out an abnormal genomic imprinting status of imprinted genes related with neurogenetic disorders according to uniparental genotypes.

Keyword

Genomic imprinting; Parthenogenetic cells; Induced-pluripotent stem cells; Neural stem cells; in vitro model

MeSH Terms

Alleles
Astrocytes
Cell Lineage
DNA Methylation
Embryonic Stem Cells
Embryonic Structures
Epigenomics
Ethics
Gene Expression
Genomic Imprinting*
Genotype
Growth and Development
Humans*
In Vitro Techniques
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells*
Mammals
Mass Screening
Neural Stem Cells
Neurons

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Derivation of NSCs from iPSCs and their characterization. (A) Schematic representation and phase contrast photomicrographs of hSi-NSCs and hPgi-NSCs derivation. hSi-NSCs, human somatic induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells; hPgi-NSCs, human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells. (B) RT-PCR analysis of the expression of pluripotency markers (OCT4 and NANOG), and self-renewal and NSC-specific markers (SOX2, SOX1, PAX6, and MASH1) in S Fibs, Pg Fibs, hSiPSCs, hPgiPSCs, and in differentiated hSi-NSCs and hPgi-NSCs. S Fibs, human somatic fibroblasts; Pg Fibs, human parthenogenetic fibroblasts; hSiPSCs, human somatic induced pluripotent stem cells; hPgiPSCs, human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cells. (C) Immunocytochemistry of hSi-NSCs and hPgi-NSCs shows the expression of NSC marker proteins (SOX2 and PAX6; green), which co-localize with DAPI (blue) in the nucleus. Scale bar: 100 μm. (D) Immunocytochemistry of neurons and astrocytes differentiated from hSi-NSCs and hPgi-NSCs shows the expression of neuron marker proteins (MAP2, green; TUJ1, red), and an astrocyte marker protein (GFAP, green), which co-localize with DAPI (blue) in the nucleus. Scale bars: 100 μm. MAP2: microtubule-associated protein 2, TUJ1: neuron-specific class III beta-tubulin, GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein.

  • Fig. 2 DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes. Methylation of imprinted genes was analyzed by bisulfite sequencing. Paternally imprinted gene, MEG3; Maternally imprinted genes, MAGEL2, SNRPN, NDN and GRB10; the imprinted gene which have unmethylated CpGs, UBE3A. White and black circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpG islands, respectively.

  • Fig. 3 Expression of MEG3, MAGEL2, SNRPN, NDN, GRB10 (un1), and GRB10 (un2) analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR. The expression levels in hSiPSCs were set to 1. Means±SEM are shown for three independent experiments. Significance of inter-group differences was determined by one-way analysis of variance; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001. Significance of the differences between cell types was determined by t-test, and the p-values are indicated each graph with ** and ***.

  • Fig. 4 Imprinting status in the PWS/AS region (Chr. 15q11~13) and UBE3A expression. (A) Schematic representation of the PWS and AS region and primers designed to determine methylation imprints at the IC. PWS: Prader-Willi syndrome, AS: Angelman syndrome, IC: imprinting center. (B) Methylation-specific PCR analysis of the PWS-IC in all somatic and parthenogenetic cells. (C) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of UBE3A expression in somatic and parthenogenetic cells during neural differentiation. The expression in hSiPSCs was set to 1. Means±SEM are shown for three independent experiments. Significance of inter-group differences was determined by one-way analysis of variance; ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001. Significance of the differences between cell types was determined by t-test, and p-values are indicated with *, **, and ***.


Reference

References

1. Reik W, Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2:21–32. DOI: 10.1038/35047554. PMID: 11253064.
Article
2. Plasschaert RN, Bartolomei MS. Genomic imprinting in development, growth, behavior and stem cells. Development. 2014; 141:1805–1813. DOI: 10.1242/dev.101428. PMID: 24757003. PMCID: 3994769.
Article
3. Battaglia A. The inv dup(15) or idic(15) syndrome: a clinically recognisable neurogenetic disorder. Brain Dev. 2005; 27:365–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2004.08.006. PMID: 16023554.
4. Woodfine K, Huddleston JE, Murrell A. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation at all human imprinted regions reveals preservation of epigenetic stability in adult somatic tissue. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2011; 4:1. DOI: 10.1186/1756-8935-4-1. PMID: 21281512. PMCID: 3038880.
Article
5. Gregg C, Zhang J, Weissbourd B, Luo S, Schroth GP, Haig D, Dulac C. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science. 2010; 329:643–648. DOI: 10.1126/science.1190830. PMID: 20616232. PMCID: 3005244.
Article
6. Caspary T, Cleary MA, Perlman EJ, Zhang P, Elledge SJ, Tilghman SM. Oppositely imprinted genes p57(Kip2) and igf2 interact in a mouse model for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Genes Dev. 1999; 13:3115–3124. DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.23.3115. PMID: 10601037. PMCID: 317182.
Article
7. Epsztejn-Litman S, Cohen-Hadad Y, Aharoni S, Altarescu G, Renbaum P, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Establishment of homozygote mutant human embryonic stem cells by parthenogenesis. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0138893. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138893. PMID: 26473610. PMCID: 4608834.
Article
8. Stelzer Y, Bar S, Bartok O, Afik S, Ronen D, Kadener S, Benvenisty N. Differentiation of human parthenogenetic pluripotent stem cells reveals multiple tissue- and isoform-specific imprinted transcripts. Cell Rep. 2015; 11:308–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.023. PMID: 25843718.
Article
9. Stelzer Y, Ronen D, Bock C, Boyle P, Meissner A, Benvenisty N. Identification of novel imprinted differentially methylated regions by global analysis of human-parthenogenetic-induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2013; 1:79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.03.005. PMID: 24052944. PMCID: 3757747.
Article
10. Stelzer Y, Yanuka O, Benvenisty N. Global analysis of parental imprinting in human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011; 18:735–741. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2050. PMID: 21572443.
Article
11. Choi NY, Bang JS, Lee HJ, Park YS, Lee M, Jeong D, Ko K, Han DW, Chung HM, Kim GJ, Shim SH, Hwang HS, Ko K. Novel imprinted single CpG sites found by global DNA methylation analysis in human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cells. Epigenetics. 2018; 13:343–351. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1460033. PMID: 29613829. PMCID: 6140819.
Article
12. Mo WM, Kwon YW, Jang IH3, Choi EJ, Kwon SM, Kim JH. Role of TAZ in lysophosphatidic acid-induced migration and proliferation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2017; 25:354–361. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2016.263. PMID: 28554198. PMCID: 5499612.
Article
13. Lee HJ, Choi NY, Lee SW, Ko K, Hwang TS, Han DW, Lim J, Schöler HR, Ko K. Epigenetic alteration of imprinted genes during neural differentiation of germline-derived pluripotent stem cells. Epigenetics. 2016; 11:177–183. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1146852. PMID: 26962997. PMCID: 4854545.
Article
14. Chamberlain SJ, Chen PF, Ng KY, Bourgois-Rocha F, Lemtiri-Chlieh F, Levine ES, Lalande M. Induced pluripotent stem cell models of the genomic imprinting disorders Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107:17668–17673. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004487107. PMID: 20876107. PMCID: 2955112.
Article
15. Kelava I, Lancaster MA. Stem cell models of human brain development. Cell Stem Cell. 2016; 18:736–748. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.022. PMID: 27257762.
Article
16. Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB, Ramos L, Pääbo S, Rebhan M, Schübeler D. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007; 39:457–466. DOI: 10.1038/ng1990. PMID: 17334365.
Article
17. Burnett LC, LeDuc CA, Sulsona CR, Paull D, Eddiry S, Levy B, Salles JP, Tauber M, Driscoll DJ, Egli D, Leibel RL. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) created from skin fibroblasts of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) retain the molecular signature of PWS. Stem Cell Res. 2016; 17:526–530. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2016.08.008. PMID: 27789403.
Article
18. Lau JC, Hanel ML, Wevrick R. Tissue-specific and imprinted epigenetic modifications of the human NDN gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32:3376–3382. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh671. PMID: 15247330. PMCID: 443546.
Article
19. Hippenmeyer S, Johnson RL, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals cell-type-specific paternal growth dominance. Cell Rep. 2013; 3:960–967. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.002. PMID: 23453967. PMCID: 3668097.
Article
20. Hikichi T, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ishino F. Imprinting regulation of the murine Meg1/Grb10 and human GRB10 genes; roles of brain-specific promoters and mouse-specific CTCF-binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31:1398–1406. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg232. PMID: 12595547. PMCID: 149825.
Article
21. Benetatos L, Vartholomatos G, Hatzimichael E. MEG3 imprinted gene contribution in tumorigenesis. Int J Cancer. 2011; 129:773–779. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26052. PMID: 21400503.
Article
22. Nishino K, Toyoda M, Yamazaki-Inoue M, Fukawatase Y, Chikazawa E, Sakaguchi H, Akutsu H, Umezawa A. DNA methylation dynamics in human induced pluripotent stem cells over time. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7:e1002085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002085. PMID: 21637780. PMCID: 3102737.
Article
23. Lee S, Kozlov S, Hernandez L, Chamberlain SJ, Brannan CI, Stewart CL, Wevrick R. Expression and imprinting of MAGEL2 suggest a role in Prader-willi syndrome and the homologous murine imprinting phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2000; 9:1813–1819. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/9.12.1813. PMID: 10915770.
Article
24. Smallwood SA, Kelsey G. De novo DNA methylation: a germ cell perspective. Trends Genet. 2012; 28:33–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.09.004. PMID: 22019337.
Article
25. Brant JO, Riva A, Resnick JL, Yang TP. Influence of the Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting center on the DNA methylation landscape in the mouse brain. Epigenetics. 2014; 9:1540–1556. DOI: 10.4161/15592294.2014.969667. PMID: 25482058. PMCID: 4623435.
Article
26. Adalsteinsson BT, Ferguson-Smith AC. Epigenetic control of the genome-lessons from genomic imprinting. Genes (Basel). 2014; 5:635–655. DOI: 10.3390/genes5030635. PMID: 25257202. PMCID: 4198922.
Article
27. Takahashi N, Okamoto A, Kobayashi R, Shirai M, Obata Y, Ogawa H, Sotomaru Y, Kono T. Deletion of Gtl2, imprinted non-coding RNA, with its differentially methylated region induces lethal parent-origin-dependent defects in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2009; 18:1879–1888. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp108. PMID: 19264764.
Article
28. Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J. Mechanisms of imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A. 2008; 146A:2041–2052. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32364. PMID: 18627066.
Article
29. Matarazzo V, Muscatelli F. Natural breaking of the maternal silence at the mouse and human imprinted Prader-Willi locus: a whisper with functional consequences. Rare Dis. 2013; 1:e27228. DOI: 10.4161/rdis.27228. PMID: 25003016. PMCID: 3978896.
30. Yamasaki-Ishizaki Y, Kayashima T, Mapendano CK, Soejima H, Ohta T, Masuzaki H, Kinoshita A, Urano T, Yoshiura K, Matsumoto N, Ishimaru T, Mukai T, Niikawa N, Kishino T. Role of DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in tissue-specific imprinting of mouse Grb10. Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 27:732–742. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01329-06. PMID: 17101788. PMCID: 1800802.
Article
31. Cheon CK. Genetics of Prader-Willi syndrome and Prader-Will-Like syndrome. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 21:126–135. DOI: 10.6065/apem.2016.21.3.126. PMID: 27777904. PMCID: 5073158.
Article
32. Chamberlain SJ, Lalande M. Angelman syndrome, a genomic imprinting disorder of the brain. J Neurosci. 2010; 30:9958–9963. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1728-10.2010. PMID: 20668179.
Article
33. Kishino T, Lalande M, Wagstaff J. UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997; 15:70–73. DOI: 10.1038/ng0197-70. PMID: 8988171.
Article
34. Stanurova J, Neureiter A, Hiber M, de Oliveira Kessler H, Stolp K, Goetzke R, Klein D, Bankfalvi A, Klump H, Steenpass L. Angelman syndrome-derived neurons display late onset of paternal UBE3A silencing. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:30792. DOI: 10.1038/srep30792. PMID: 27484051. PMCID: 4971516.
Article
35. Grier MD, Carson RP, Lagrange AH. Toward a broader view of Ube3a in a mouse model of angelman syndrome: expression in brain, spinal cord, sciatic nerve and glial cells. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0124649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124649. PMID: 25894543. PMCID: 4403805.
Article
36. Judson MC, Sosa-Pagan JO, Del Cid WA, Han JE, Philpot BD. Allelic specificity of Ube3a expression in the mouse brain during postnatal development. J Comp Neurol. 2014; 522:1874–1896. DOI: 10.1002/cne.23507. PMID: 24254964. PMCID: 3984624.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IJSC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr