1. Rodriguez M, Siva A, Cross SA, et al. Optic neuritis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology. 1995; 45:244–250.
2. Wakakura M, Minei-Higa R, Oono S, et al. Baseline features of idiopathic optic neuritis as determined by a multicenter treatment trial in Japan. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Multicenter Cooperative Research Group (ONMRG). Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999; 43:127–132.
3. Du Y, Yang J, Li JJ, et al. Unilateral optic neuritis in a Chinese population in three centers. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18:902–904.
Article
4. Wang JC, Tow S, Aung T, et al. The presentation, aetiology, management and outcome of optic neuritis in an Asian population. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 29:312–315.
Article
5. Lim SA, Sitoh YY, Chng SM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute optic neuritis in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009; 38:821–826.
6. Bee YS, Lin MC, Wang CC, Sheu SJ. Optic neuritis: clinical analysis of 27 cases. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003; 19:105–112.
Article
7. Du Y, Lin YC, He JF. The etiology of optic neuritis in Asian population. Med Hypotheses. 2008; 71:821–822.
Article
8. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, et al. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6:805–815.
Article
9. Benamer HT, Ahmed ES, Al-Din AS, Grosset DG. Frequency and clinical patterns of multiple sclerosis in Arab countries: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2009; 278:1–4.
Article
10. Cabre P, Heinzlef O, Merle H, et al. MS and neuromyelitis optica in Martinique (French West Indies). Neurology. 2001; 56:507–514.
Article
11. Chopra JS, Radhakrishnan K, Sawhney BB, et al. Multiple sclerosis in North-West India. Acta Neurol Scand. 1980; 62:312–321.
Article
12. Kira J. Multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population. Lancet Neurol. 2003; 2:117–127.
Article
13. Papais-Alvarenga RM, Miranda-Santos CM, Puccioni-Sohler M, et al. Optic neuromyelitis syndrome in Brazilian patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 73:429–435.
Article
14. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015; 85:177–189.
Article
15. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69:292–302.
Article
16. Kang ES, Min JH, Lee KH, Kim BJ. Clinical usefulness of cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assay for the detection of aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Ann Lab Med. 2012; 32:331–338.
Article
17. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001; 50:121–127.
Article
18. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983; 33:1444–1452.
Article
19. The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:1673–1678.
20. Smith CH. Optic neuritis. In : Miller NR, Newman NJ, Biousse V, Kerrison JB, editors. Walsh and Hoyt's clinical neuro-ophthalmology. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2005. p. 293–262.
21. Kennedy C, Carroll FD. Optic neuritis in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1960; 63:747–755.
Article
22. Beck RW, Cleary PA. Optic neuritis treatment trial. One-year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:773–775.
23. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Backlund JC. The course of visual recovery after optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1771–1778.
24. Kupersmith MJ, Gal RL, Beck RW, et al. Visual function at baseline and 1 month in acute optic neuritis: predictors of visual outcome. Neurology. 2007; 69:508–514.
Article
25. Kezuka T, Usui Y, Yamakawa N, et al. Relationship between NMO-antibody and anti-MOG antibody in optic neuritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012; 32:107–110.
Article
26. Kitley J, Waters P, Woodhall M, et al. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with aquaporin-4 and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies: a comparative study. JAMA Neurol. 2014; 71:276–283.