Yonsei Med J.  2019 Jan;60(1):73-78. 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.73.

Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Patients with a History of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. mdzara@ncc.re.kr
  • 2Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 3Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Prior abdomino-pelvic (AP) surgery makes colonoscopy difficult and can affect bowel preparation quality. However, bowel preparation quality has been found to vary according to prior AP surgery type. We examined the relationship of prior AP surgery type with bowel preparation quality in a large-scale retrospective cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the health screening cohort of the National Cancer Center, 12881 participants who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy between June 2007 and December 2014 were included. Personal data were collected by reviewing patient medical records. Bowel preparation quality was assessed using the Aronchick scale and was categorized as satisfactory for excellent to good bowel preparation or unsatisfactory for fair to inadequate bowel preparation.
RESULTS
A total of 1557 (12.1%) participants had a history of AP surgery. The surgery types were colorectal surgery (n=44), gastric/small intestinal surgery (n=125), appendectomy/peritoneum/laparotomy (n=476), cesarean section (n=278), uterus/ovarian surgery (n=317), kidney/bladder/prostate surgery (n=19), or liver/pancreatobiliary surgery (n=96). The proportion of satisfactory bowel preparations was 70.7%. In multivariate analysis, unsatisfactory bowel preparation was related to gastric/small intestinal surgery (odds ratio=1.764, 95% confidence interval=1.230-2.532, p=0.002). However, the other surgery types did not affect bowel preparation quality. Current smoking, diabetes, and high body mass index were risk factors of unacceptable bowel preparation.
CONCLUSION
Only gastric/small intestinal surgery was a potential risk factor for poor bowel preparation. Further research on patients with a history of gastric/small intestinal surgery to determine appropriate methods for adequate bowel preparation is mandatory.

Keyword

Postoperative period; colonoscopy; bowel preparation; cohort study

MeSH Terms

Body Mass Index
Cesarean Section
Cohort Studies*
Colonoscopy*
Colorectal Surgery
Female
Humans
Mass Screening
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Postoperative Period
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies*
Risk Factors
Smoke
Smoking
Smoke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Inclusion and exclusion process.


Reference

1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1298–1306. PMID: 24693890.
Article
2. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1095–1105. PMID: 24047059.
Article
3. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M. Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut. 2001; 48:812–815. PMID: 11358901.
Article
4. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Sonnenberg A. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95:868–877. PMID: 10763931.
5. Lindsay DC, Freeman JG, Cobden I, Record CO. Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988; 296:167–169.
Article
6. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61:378–384. PMID: 15758907.
Article
7. Akere A, Otegbayo JA. Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016; 3:e000076.
Article
8. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, Ingber S, Bernstein G, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:558–562. PMID: 11677470.
Article
9. Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol. 1994; 89:556–560. PMID: 8147359.
10. Lim SW, Seo YW, Sinn DH, Kim JY, Chang DK, Kim JJ, et al. Impact of previous gastric or colonic resection on polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:1554–1559. PMID: 22170320.
Article
11. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:501–506. PMID: 22239959.
Article
12. Nguyen DL, Wieland M. Risk factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010; 19:369–372. PMID: 21188326.
13. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, Kim KO, Park CH, Hahn T, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009; 43:448–452. PMID: 18978506.
14. Kim J. Cancer screenee cohort study of the National Cancer Center in South Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2014; 36:e2014013. PMID: 25119453.
Article
15. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94:2667.
16. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990; 72:60–63. PMID: 2301905.
17. Chung HH, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. Frequency and risk factors of colorectal adenoma in patients with early gastric cancer. Intern Med J. 2017; 47:1184–1189. PMID: 28675538.
Article
18. Joo MK, Park JJ, Lee WW, Lee BJ, Hwang JK, Kim SH, et al. Differences in the prevalence of colorectal polyps in patients undergoing endoscopic removal of gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer and in healthy individuals. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:114–120. PMID: 20140828.
Article
19. Yang MH, Son HJ, Lee JH, Kim MH, Kim JY, Kim YH, et al. Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:774–781. PMID: 20363417.
Article
20. Borg BB, Gupta NK, Zuckerman GR, Banerjee B, Gyawali CP. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7:670–675. PMID: 19245852.
Article
21. Kwon JE, Lee JW, Im JP, Kim JW, Kim SH, Koh SJ, et al. Comparable efficacy of a 1-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution administered with bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution for colonoscopy preparation: a prospective, randomized and investigator-blinded trial. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0162051. PMID: 27588943.
Article
22. Zorzi M, Valiante F, Germanà B, Baldassarre G, Coria B, Rinaldi M, et al. Comparison between different colon cleansing products for screening colonoscopy. A noninferiority trial in population-based screening programs in Italy. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:223–231. PMID: 26760605.
Article
23. Gimeno-García AZ, Hernandez G, Aldea A, Nicolás-Pérez D, Jiménez A, Carrillo M, et al. Comparison of two intensive bowel cleansing regimens in patients with previous poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112:951–958. PMID: 28291237.
Article
24. Cheng J, Tao K, Shuai X, Gao J. Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30:4033–4041. PMID: 26679172.
Article
25. van Lieshout I, Munsterman ID, Eskes AM, Maaskant JM, van der Hulst R. Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5:917–943.
26. Wong MC, Ching JY, Chan VC, Lam TY, Luk AK, Tang RS, et al. Determinants of bowel preparation quality and its association with adenoma detection: a prospective colonoscopy study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e2251. PMID: 26765402.
27. Fang J, Fu HY, Ma D, Wang D, Liu YP, Wang YF, et al. Constipation, fiber intake and non-compliance contribute to inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective cohort study. J Dig Dis. 2016; 17:458–463. PMID: 27356275.
Article
28. Guo X, Yang Z, Zhao L, Leung F, Luo H, Kang X, et al. Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85:90–97. PMID: 27189659.
Article
29. Liu X, Luo H, Zhang L, Leung FW, Liu Z, Wang X, et al. Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study. Gut. 2014; 63:125–130. PMID: 23503044.
Article
30. Wu KL, Rayner CK, Chuah SK, Chiu KW, Lu CC, Chiu YC. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54:107–112. PMID: 21160321.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr