Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Apr;38(2):209-217.

Two-Year Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation in Adults With Cerebral Palsy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. srcho918@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Graduate School Program of Nano Science and Technology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Avison Biomedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on reducing dystonia and disability in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and to compare the therapeutic outcomes between primary dystonia patients and CP patients over two years after bilateral pallidal DBS.
METHODS
Five patients with primary dystonia and seven CP patients with dystonia were recruited. All subjects received DBS surgery in both globus pallidus. Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale consisting of dystonia movement score and disability score and subjective satisfaction scale were assessed after 1 month and every 6 months over two years following DBS treatment.
RESULTS
On the dystonia movement scale, both groups of primary dystonia patients and CP patients showed a significant decrease over time following DBS. On the disability scale, patients with primary dystonia showed a significant decrease over time, whereas the disability score of CP patients did not change over the two years. Comparing the dystonia movement and disability scores of CP patients at each assessment, patients with primary dystonia showed a significant reduction after 6 months. Comparing the satisfaction scores of CP patients after DBS, patients with primary dystonia showed significantly higher subjective satisfaction.
CONCLUSION
Whereas dystonia can be significantly reduced in patients with primary dystonia, CP patients showed a modest improvement on the dystonia movement scale, but not on the disability scale. Therefore, DBS may be considered with caution as a treatment modality of CP patients with dystonia.

Keyword

Deep brain stimulation; Dystonia; Cerebral palsy; Dystonia rating scale

MeSH Terms

Adult*
Cerebral Palsy*
Deep Brain Stimulation*
Dystonia
Dystonic Disorders
Globus Pallidus
Humans

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Changes in dystonia rating scale over time up to 2 years after deep brain stimulation (DBS). (A) Two groups of primary dystonia and cerebral palsy (CP) patients showed a significant decrease over time following DBS on the dystonia movement scale. However, the mean score in CP patients was rather slightly increased after 1 year following DBS. Consequently, the reduction of dystonia movement score was significantly different over time between two groups. (B) Patients with primary dystonia showed a significant decrease over time on the disability scale following DBS, whereas that of CP patients with dystonia did not change up to 2 years, resulting in a significant difference between two groups. *p<0.05.

  • Fig. 2 Percentages of improvement on the dystonia rating scale at 1 year and 2 years after deep brain stimulation (DBS). (A) When the percentages of improvement relative to the preoperative score were estimated on the dystonia movement scale, cerebral palsy (CP) patients showed an improvement in dystonia movement after 1 year following DBS, but the improvement (%) rather decreased after 2 years following DBS, whereas patients with primary dystonia showed improvement in dystonia symptoms up to 2 years following DBS. Consequently, patients with primary dystonia showed a significant improvement at 1 year and 2 years following DBS, compared with CP patients (p<0.05). (B) When the percentages of improvement (%) were estimated on the disability scale, patients with primary dystonia showed an improvement in disability at 1 year after DBS and improved further at 2 years following DBS. However, CP patients with dystonia did not show any improvement in disability after DBS treatment, resulting in a significant difference between two groups at 2 years following DBS (p<0.05). *p<0.05.

  • Fig. 3 Subjective satisfaction scales at 1 year and 2 years after deep brain stimulation (DBS). When the degree of subjective satisfaction was assessed by a 10 score scale, cerebral palsy (CP) patients with dystonia showed a score of 5.5±1.0 at 1 year after DBS, but showed a decrease in the satisfaction score of 4.0±1.5 after 2 years following DBS, whereas patients with primary dystonia showed a score of 8.3±0.5 at 1 year after DBS and they further increased to a score of 9.2±0.4 after 2 years following DBS. Consequently, patients with primary dystonia showed a significantly higher subjective satisfaction at 1 year and 2 years following DBS (p<0.05). *p<0.05.


Reference

1. Bhidayasiri R. Dystonia: genetics and treatment update. Neurologist. 2006; 12:74–85. PMID: 16534444.
2. Fahn S. Concept and classification of dystonia. Adv Neurol. 1988; 50:1–8. PMID: 3041755.
3. Hartmann A, Pogarell O, Oertel WH. Secondary dystonias. J Neurol. 1998; 245:511–518. PMID: 9747914.
Article
4. Jankovic J. Dystonia: medical therapy and botulinum toxin. Adv Neurol. 2004; 94:275–286. PMID: 14509685.
5. Gilderberg PL, Tasker RR. Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 1st ed. New York: Springer;1998.
6. Ostrem JL, Starr PA. Treatment of dystonia with deep brain stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2008; 5:320–330. PMID: 18394573.
Article
7. DeLong M, Wichmann T. Deep brain stimulation for movement and other neurologic disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1265:1–8. PMID: 22823512.
Article
8. Benabid AL, Benazzouz A, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P. Long-term electrical inhibition of deep brain targets in movement disorders. Mov Disord. 1998; 13(Suppl 3):119–125. PMID: 9827607.
Article
9. Benazzouz A, Breit S, Koudsie A, Pollak P, Krack P, Benabid AL. Intraoperative microrecordings of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2002; 17(Suppl 3):S145–S149. PMID: 11948769.
Article
10. Olanow CW, Brin MF, Obeso JA. The role of deep brain stimulation as a surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 2000; 55(12 Suppl 6):S60–S66. PMID: 11188977.
11. Vercueil L, Krack P, Pollak P. Results of deep brain stimulation for dystonia: a critical reappraisal. Mov Disord. 2002; 17(Suppl 3):S89–S93. PMID: 11948761.
Article
12. Eltahawy HA, Saint-Cyr J, Giladi N, Lang AE, Lozano AM. Primary dystonia is more responsive than secondary dystonia to pallidal interventions: outcome after pallidotomy or pallidal deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2004; 54:613–619. PMID: 15028135.
Article
13. Vidailhet M, Yelnik J, Lagrange C, Fraix V, Grabli D, Thobois S, et al. Bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation for the treatment of patients with dystonia-choreoathetosis cerebral palsy: a prospective pilot study. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8:709–717. PMID: 19576854.
Article
14. Pretto TE, Dalvi A, Kang UJ, Penn RD. A prospective blinded evaluation of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of secondary dystonia and primary torticollis syndromes. J Neurosurg. 2008; 109:405–409. PMID: 18759568.
Article
15. Zhang JG, Zhang K, Wang ZC, Ge M, Ma Y. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of secondary dystonia. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006; 119:2069–2074. PMID: 17199958.
Article
16. Katsakiori PF, Kefalopoulou Z, Markaki E, Paschali A, Ellul J, Kagadis GC, et al. Deep brain stimulation for secondary dystonia: results in 8 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009; 151:473–478. PMID: 19322514.
Article
17. Hardesty DE, Sackeim HA. Deep brain stimulation in movement and psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 61:831–835. PMID: 17126303.
Article
18. Kopell BH, Greenberg B, Rezai AR. Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 21:51–67. PMID: 15097294.
Article
19. Yu H, Neimat JS. The treatment of movement disorders by deep brain stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2008; 5:26–36. PMID: 18164481.
Article
20. Krauss JK, Yianni J, Loher TJ, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 21:18–30. PMID: 15097291.
Article
21. Tagliati M, Shils J, Sun C, Alterman R. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2004; 1:33–41. PMID: 16293008.
Article
22. Krack P, Pollak P, Limousin P, Benazzouz A, Deuschl G, Benabid AL. From off-period dystonia to peak-dose chorea: the clinical spectrum of varying subthalamic nucleus activity. Brain. 1999; 122(Pt 6):1133–1146. PMID: 10356065.
Article
23. Kupsch A, Earl C. Neurosurgical interventions in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson disease: neurostimulation and neural implantation. J Mol Med (Berl). 1999; 77:178–184. PMID: 9930959.
Article
24. Tisch S, Rothwell JC, Limousin P, Hariz MI, Corcos DM. The physiological effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation in dystonia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007; 15:166–172. PMID: 17601185.
Article
25. Kim JP, Chang WS, Park YS, Chang JW. Bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation for DYT1+ generalized dystonia with previously received bilateral thalamotomy and unilateral pallidotomy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011; 89:205–209. PMID: 21597310.
Article
26. Alcindor D, Oh MY, Baser S, Angle C, Cheng BC, Whiting D. Stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in a patient with DYT1-positive primary generalized dystonia: a 10-year follow-up. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 29:E16. PMID: 20672918.
Article
27. Andrews C, Aviles-Olmos I, Hariz M, Foltynie T. Which patients with dystonia benefit from deep brain stimulation? A metaregression of individual patient outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81:1383–1389. PMID: 20841370.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr