Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr.  2015 Dec;18(4):238-245. 10.5223/pghn.2015.18.4.238.

Esophageal Bolus Transit in Newborns with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Study

Affiliations
  • 1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S.Anna-Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Torino, Italy. francesco.cresi@unito.it
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
  • 3Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Torino, Italy.
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, University of Bari Policlinico, Bari, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate bolus transit during esophageal swallow (ES) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) events and to investigate the relationship between the characteristics of ES and GER events in a population of term and preterm newborns with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODS
The study population consisted of term and preterm newborns referred to combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and pH monitoring for GERD symptoms. The frequency and characteristics of ES and GER events were assessed by two independent investigators. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
RESULTS
Fifty-four newborns (23 preterm) were included in the analyses. Median bolus head advancing time corrected for esophageal length (BHATc) was shorter during mealtime than during the postprandial period (median, interquartile range): 0.20 (0.15-0.29) s/cm vs. 0.47 (0.39-0.64) s/cm, p<0.001. Median bolus presence time (BPT) was prolonged during mealtime: 4.71(3.49-6.27) s vs. 2.66 (1.82-3.73) s, p<0.001. Higher BHATc (p=0.03) and prolonged BPT (p<0.001) were observed in preterm newborns during the postprandial period. A significant positive correlation between BHATc and bolus clearance time was also observed (rho=0.33, p=0.016).
CONCLUSION
The analysis of ES and GER events at the same time by MII provides useful information to better understand the physiopathology of GERD. In particular, the analysis of BHATc during the postprandial period could help clinicians identify newborns with prolonged esophageal clearance time due to impaired esophageal motility, which could allow for more accurate recommendations regarding further tests and treatment.

Keyword

Esophageal swallow; Gastroesophageal reflux; Esophageal impedance; Newborn; Premature birth

MeSH Terms

Electric Impedance*
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
Head
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Infant, Newborn*
Meals
Postprandial Period
Premature Birth
Research Personnel

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Impedance characteristics of esophageal swallow (ES) events during mealtime and the postprandial period. Ch.: impedance channel, BHAT: bolus head advancing time, BPT: bolus presence time.

  • Fig. 2 Spearman correlation for bolus head advancing time corrected for esophageal length (BHATc) and bolus clearance time (BCT).


Reference

1. Vandenplas Y, Hegar B. Diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in infants and children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000; 15:593–603.
Article
2. Omari TI, Barnett CP, Benninga MA, Lontis R, Goodchild L, Haslam RR, et al. Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease. Gut. 2002; 51:475–479.
Article
3. Chitkara DK, Fortunato C, Nurko S. Esophageal motor activity in children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease and esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005; 40:70–75.
Article
4. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Shay SS, Castell DO. Multichannel intraluminal impedance in esophageal function testing and gastroesophageal reflux monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003; 37:206–215.
Article
5. van Wijk MP, Benninga MA, Omari TI. Role of the multichannel intraluminal impedance technique in infants and children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009; 48:2–12.
Article
6. López-Alonso M, Moya MJ, Cabo JA, Ribas J, del Carmen Macías M, Silny J, et al. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatrics. 2006; 118:e299–e308.
7. Francavilla R, Magistà AM, Bucci N, Villirillo A, Boscarelli G, Mappa L, et al. Comparison of esophageal pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010; 50:154–160.
Article
8. Corvaglia L, Mariani E, Aceti A, Capretti MG, Ancora G, Faldella G. Combined oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in preterm newborn: comparison of two options for layout analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009; 21:1027–e81.
Article
9. Wenzl TG, Skopnik H. Intraluminal impedance: an ideal technique for evaluation of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000; 2:259–264.
Article
10. Peter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Detection of small bolus volumes using multiple intraluminal impedance in preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003; 36:381–384.
Article
11. Di Pace MR, Caruso AM, Catalano P, Casuccio A, De Grazia E. Evaluation of esophageal motility using multichannel intraluminal impedance in healthy children and children with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011; 52:26–30.
Article
12. Imam H, Shay S, Ali A, Baker M. Bolus transit patterns in healthy subjects: a study using simultaneous impedance monitoring, videoesophagram, and esophageal manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005; 288:G1000–G1006.
Article
13. Rudolph CD, Mazur LJ, Liptak GS, Baker RD, Boyle JT, Colletti RB, et al. North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001; 32:Suppl 2. S1–S31.
14. Gupta A, Jadcherla SR. The relationship between somatic growth and in vivo esophageal segmental and sphincteric growth in human neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 43:35–41.
Article
15. Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2:230–236.
Article
16. Hila A, Chowdhury N, Hajar N, Castell DO. Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45:862–866.
17. Frieling T, Hermann S, Kuhlbusch R, Enck P, Silny J, Lübke HJ, et al. Comparison between intraluminal multiple electric impedance measurement and manometry in the human oesophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1996; 8:45–50.
Article
18. Clayton SB, Rife C, Kalbfleisch JH, Castell DO. Viscous impedance is an important indicator of abnormal esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25:563–e455.
Article
19. Omari TI, Rommel N, Szczesniak MM, Fuentealba S, Dinning PG, Davidson GP, et al. Assessment of intraluminal impedance for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing in healthy adults. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006; 290:G183–G188.
Article
20. Loots C, Smits M, Omari T, Bennink R, Benninga M, van Wijk M. Effect of lateral positioning on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and underlying mechanisms in GER disease (GERD) patients and healthy controls. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25:222–229.
Article
21. van Wijk MP, Benninga MA, Dent J, Lontis R, Goodchild L, McCall LM, et al. Effect of body position changes on postprandial gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying in the healthy premature neonate. J Pediatr. 2007; 151:585–590.
Article
22. van Wijk MP, Benninga MA, Davidson GP, Haslam R, Omari TI. Small volumes of feed can trigger transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and gastroesophageal reflux in the right lateral position in infants. J Pediatr. 2010; 156:744–748.
Article
23. Staiano A, Boccia G, Salvia G, Zappulli D, Clouse RE. Development of esophageal peristalsis in preterm and term neonates. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132:1718–1725.
Article
24. Jadcherla SR, Duong HQ, Hoffmann RG, Shaker R. Esophageal body and upper esophageal sphincter motor responses to esophageal provocation during maturation in preterm newborns. J Pediatr. 2003; 143:31–38.
Article
25. Omari TI, Miki K, Fraser R, Davidson G, Haslam R, Goldsworthy W, et al. Esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter function in healthy premature infants. Gastroenterology. 1995; 109:1757–1764.
Article
26. Gupta A, Gulati P, Kim W, Fernandez S, Shaker R, Jadcherla SR. Effect of postnatal maturation on the mechanisms of esophageal propulsion in preterm human neonates: primary and secondary peristalsis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:411–419.
Article
27. Lang IM. Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2009; 24:333–348.
Article
28. Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42:610–619.
Article
29. Holloway RH. Esophageal body motor response to reflux events: secondary peristalsis. Am J Med. 2000; 108:Suppl 4a. 20S–26S.
30. Cresi F, Locatelli E, Marinaccio C, Grasso G, Coscia A, Bertino E. Prognostic values of multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in newborns with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr. 2013; 162:770–775.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PGHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr