Clin Endosc.  2015 Nov;48(6):542-548. 10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.542.

The Clinical Usefulness of Simultaneous Placement of Double Endoscopic Nasobiliary Biliary Drainage

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sklee@amc.seoul.kr
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Hanmaeum Hospital, Jeju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
To evaluate the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of double endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) as a new method of draining multiple bile duct obstructions.
METHODS
A total of 38 patients who underwent double ENBD between January 2004 and February 2010 at the Asan Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated indications, laboratory results, and the clinical course.
RESULTS
Of the 38 patients who underwent double ENBD, 20 (52.6%) had Klatskin tumors, 12 (31.6%) had hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 (7.9%) had strictures at the anastomotic site following liver transplantation, and 3 (7.9%) had acute cholecystitis combined with cholangitis. Double ENBD was performed to relieve multiple biliary obstruction in 21 patients (55.1%), drain contrast agent filled during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 4 (10.5%), obtain cholangiography in 4 (10.5%), drain hemobilia in 3 (7.9%), relieve Mirizzi syndrome with cholangitis in 3 (7.9%), and relieve jaundice in 3 (7.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
Double ENBD may be useful in patients with multiple biliary obstructions.

Keyword

Biliary stricture; Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage; Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Klatskin's tumor; Double endoscopic nasobiliary drainage

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Cholangiography
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Cholestasis
Chungcheongnam-do
Constriction, Pathologic
Drainage*
Hemobilia
Humans
Jaundice
Klatskin's Tumor
Liver Transplantation
Mirizzi Syndrome
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Double endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) in a patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth classifi cation II). Unintended contrast fi lling and high-grade biliary obstruction with separated intrahepatic ducts (IHDs) were noted and contrast drainage was not accomplished during ERCP (A, E). After two guidewires were inserted in the two IHDs (B, C, F and G), the scope was extracted under fluoroscopic guidance, with a double ENBD tube deployed in both IHDs (D, H).

  • Fig. 2. Images from a patient with Mirizzi syndrome treated with simultaneous endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage with a double ENBD catheter. The endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter was inserted further through a bile duct for deep cannulation into the cystic duct (A), following by insertion of a guidewire and its direction toward the cystic duct (B). Pus discharge thorough the opening of bile duct was noted during cannulation (E, F). A second guidewire was inserted into the right intrahepatic duct (IHD) and the ENBD catheters were passed along the guidewires (C, G). Finally, the scope was withdrawn with double ENBD catheters placed in the cystic duct and right IHD (D, H).

  • Fig. 3. Passage of two endoscopic nasobiliary drainage catheters through the same nostril.


Cited by  1 articles

Can Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage Involving Two Catheters Be Used to Treat Various Conditions?
Dong Wook Lee, Ho Gak Kim
Clin Endosc. 2015;48(6):464-465.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.464.


Reference

1. Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Nomura T, Sakata E, Hatakeyama K. Catheter tract implantation metastases associated with percutaneous biliary drainage for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:7024–7027.
Article
2. Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D. Cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative biliary drainage (Con). HPB (Oxford). 2008; 10:126–129.
Article
3. Park SY, Park CH, Cho SB, et al. The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic biliary decompression by plastic stent placement in acute suppurative cholangitis compared with nasobiliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:1076–1080.
Article
4. Arakura N, Takayama M, Ozaki Y, et al. Efficacy of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009; 16:473–477.
Article
5. Peng SY, Wang JW, Liu YB, et al. Surgical intervention for obstructive jaundice due to biliary tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 2004; 28:43–46.
Article
6. Ikenaga N, Chijiiwa K, Otani K, Ohuchida J, Uchiyama S, Kondo K. Clinicopathologic characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13:492–497.
Article
7. Sherman S. Endoscopic drainage of malignant hilar obstruction: is one biliary stent enough or should we work to place two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53:681–684.
Article
8. Freeman ML, Overby C. Selective MRCP and CT-targeted drainage of malignant hilar biliary obstruction with self-expanding metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:41–49.
Article
9. Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y, et al. Forty consecutive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins: results of a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:95–101.
10. Sakata J, Shirai Y, Tsuchiya Y, Wakai T, Nomura T, Hatakeyama K. Preoperative cholangitis independently increases in-hospital mortality after combined major hepatic and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009; 394:1065–1072.
Article
11. Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg. 2006; 244:240–247.
Article
12. Kanai M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Preoperative intrahepatic segmental cholangitis in patients with advanced carcinoma involving the hepatic hilus. Surgery. 1996; 119:498–504.
Article
13. Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M, et al. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46:242–248.
Article
14. Hochwald SN, Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Association of preoperative biliary stenting with increased postoperative infectious complications in proximal cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg. 1999; 134:261–266.
Article
15. Maguchi H, Takahashi K, Katanuma A, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007; 14:441–446.
Article
16. Ortner MA. Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: overview and new developments. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009; 25:472–476.
Article
17. Toyota N, Takada T, Amano H, Yoshida M, Miura F, Wada K. Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: alleviates inflammation and fixes operator’s aim during early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006; 13:80–85.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr