Investig Magn Reson Imaging.  2016 Dec;20(4):207-214. 10.13104/imri.2016.20.4.207.

Effect of Number of Measurement Points on Accuracy of Muscle T2 Calculations

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Japan Health Care College, Sapporo, Japan. n_tawara@nihoniryo-c.ac.jp

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the number of measurement points on the calculation of transverse relaxation time (T2) with a focus on muscle T2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study assumed that muscle T2 was comprised of a single component. Two phantom types were measured, 1 each for long ("phantom") and short T2 ("polyvinyl alcohol gel"). Right calf muscle T2 measurements were conducted in 9 healthy male volunteers using multiple-spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. For phantoms and muscle (medial gastrocnemius), 5 regions of interests were selected. All region of interest values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The T2 effective signal-ratio characteristics were used as an index to evaluate the magnetic resonance image quality for the calculation of T2 from T2-weighted images. The T2 accuracy was evaluated to determine the T2 reproducibility and the goodness-of-fit from the probability Q.
RESULTS
For the phantom and polyvinyl alcohol gel, the standard deviation of the magnetic resonance image signal at each echo time was narrow and mono-exponential, which caused large variations in the muscle T2 decay curves. The T2 effective signal-ratio change varied with T2, with the greatest decreases apparent for a short T2. There were no significant differences in T2 reproducibility when > 3 measurement points were used. There were no significant differences in goodness-of-fit when > 6 measurement points were used. Although the measurement point evaluations were stable when > 3 measurement points were used, calculation of T2 using 4 measurement points had the highest accuracy according to the goodness-of-fit. Even if the number of measurement points was increased, there was little improvement in the probability Q.
CONCLUSION
Four measurement points gave excellent reproducibility and goodness-of-fit when muscle T2 was considered mono-exponential.

Keyword

Transverse relaxation time; Skeletal muscle; Number of measurement points; Goodness-of-fit; T2 effective signal-ratio

MeSH Terms

Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Muscle, Skeletal
Polyvinyl Alcohol
Relaxation
Volunteers
Polyvinyl Alcohol

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Defining regions of interest (ROI). ROIs were placed in the (a) phantom (e.g., PVA-gel phantom), and (b) medial gastrocnemius (MG). In (a), the ROI in the phantom is represented by a gray circle. In (b), the MG is within the dashed line, and ROI is represented by a white circle.

  • Fig. 2 T2 relaxation curve and T2 effective signal ratio (T2SR) curve. (a) T2 relaxation curve and (b) T2SR for each material. Phantom (◇), PVA-gel (△), medial gastrocnemius muscle (MG) (□).

  • Fig. 3 Changes caused by number of measurement points in phantom. (a) Changes in T2 and (b) changes in the probability Q. There were no significant differences in the T2 when ≥ 3 measurement points were used. If the probability Q was > 0.9, the goodness-of-fit was high. The dashed line in (b) indicates that the probability Q was 0.9.

  • Fig. 4 Changes caused by number of measurement points in PVA-gel. (a) Changes in T2 and (b) changes in the probability Q. There were no significant differences in the T2 when ≥ 3 measurement points were used. If the probability Q was > 0.9, the goodness-of-fit was high. The dashed line in (b) indicates that the probability Q was 0.9.

  • Fig. 5 Changes caused by number of measurement points in medial gastrocnemius muscle (MG). (a) Changes in T2, (b) Changes in the probability Q.


Reference

1. Fleckenstein JL, Canby RC, Parkey RW, Peshock RM. Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 151:231–237.
2. Fleckenstein JL, Watumull D, McIntire DD, Bertocci LA, Chason DP, Peshock RM. Muscle proton T2 relaxation times and work during repetitive maximal voluntary exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 74:2855–2859.
3. Saab G, Thompson RT, Marsh GD. Effects of exercise on muscle transverse relaxation determined by MR imaging and in vivo relaxometry. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000; 88:226–223.
4. Morvan D, Leroy-Willig A. Simultaneous measurements of diffusion and transverse relaxation in exercising skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 13:943–948.
5. Price TB, McCauley TR, Duleba AJ, Wilkens KL, Gore JC. Changes in magnetic resonance transverse relaxation times of two muscles following standardized exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27:1421–1429.
6. Price TB, Gore JC. Effect of muscle glycogen content on exercise-induced changes in muscle T2 times. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998; 84:1178–1184.
7. Ababneh ZQ, Ababneh R, Maier SE, et al. On the correlation between T(2) and tissue diffusion coefficients in exercised muscle: quantitative measurements at 3T within the tibialis anterior. MAGMA. 2008; 21:273–278.
8. Nygren AT, Kaijser L. Water exchange induced by unilateral exercise in active and inactive skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002; 93:1716–1722.
9. Nygren AT. Shortened T2 after exercise in ischemic skeletal muscle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 23:177–182.
10. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Convertino VA, Dudley GA. Resistance exercise-induced fluid shifts: change in active muscle size and plasma volume. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269:R536–R543.
11. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Nyren S, Cooper TG, Potchen EJ, Meyer RA. Different effects of exercise and edema on T2 relaxation in skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37:676–682.
12. Cannon DT, Howe FA, Whipp BJ, et al. Muscle metabolism and activation heterogeneity by combined 31P chemical shift and T2 imaging, and pulmonary O2 uptake during incremental knee-extensor exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013; 115:839–849.
13. Akima H, Takahashi H, Kuno SY, Katsuta S. Coactivation pattern in human quadriceps during isokinetic knee-extension by muscle functional MRI. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004; 91:7–14.
14. Akima H, Kinugasa R, Kuno S. Recruitment of the thigh muscles during sprint cycling by muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Sports Med. 2005; 26:245–252.
15. Kinugasa R, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Quantitative assessment of skeletal muscle activation using muscle functional MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24:639–644.
16. Kubota J, Ono T, Araki M, et al. Relationship between the MRI and EMG measurements. Int J Sports Med. 2009; 30:533–537.
17. Tawara N, Nitta O, Kuruma H, et al. Functional T(2) mapping of the trunkal muscle. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2009; 8:81–83.
18. Spiess AN, Neumeyer N. An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: a Monte Carlo approach. BMC Pharmacol. 2010; 10:6.
19. Gambarota G, Cairns BE, Berde CB, Mulkern RV. Osmotic effects on the T2 relaxation decay of in vivo muscle. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46:592–599.
20. Tawara N, Itoh A. Effects of MR image noise on estimation of short T2 values from T2-weighted image series. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007; 6:187–197.
21. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press New York;1996. p. 629–661.
22. Kjaer L, Thomsen C, Henriksen O, Ring P, Stubgaard M, Pedersen EJ. Evaluation of relaxation time measurements by magnetic resonance imaging. A phantom study. Acta Radiol. 1987; 28:345–351.
23. Saab G, Thompson RT, Marsh GD. Multicomponent T2 relaxation of in vivo skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 42:150–157.
24. Hazlewood CF, Nichols BL, Chamberlain NF. Evidence for the existence of a minimum of two phases of ordered water in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1969; 222:747–750.
25. Hazlewood CF, Chang DC, Nichols BL, Woessner DE. Nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation times of water protons in skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1974; 14:583–606.
Full Text Links
  • IMRI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr