J Korean Surg Soc.  2004 May;66(5):391-396.

Clinical Expriences of Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea. Kimhk@hallym.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is inevitably painful as a result of an anodermal wound. Circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy may be associated with less postoperative pain than conventional hemorrhoidectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy, which uses PPH (Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids), offers any advantage over the conventional hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical results of hemorrhoidectomy of 122 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. There were two categories of patients: those receiving a circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy (n=50) and those receiving a conventional hemorrhoidectomy (n=72). The majority of cases were carried out under spinal anesthesia. The operation time, hospital stay, pain score, complications, and the number of days before returning to normal activity were recorded. A follow up was done using a questionnaire or through a telephone interview two weeks and six weeks after the operation. RESULTS: The mean distance from the dentate line to the completion line of stapling was 1.3+/-0.1 cm. There were two cases of the incomplete doughnut. The circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy took less time to perform (20.5+/-4.5 vs. 24.3+/-7.1 min). The mean visual analogue pain score (0~10) on the 2nd day and two weeks after operation was lower in the stapled group (4.1 and 1.5 vs. 6.1 and 3.1)(P<0.05). The stapled group had a shorter duration of hospital stay (4.1 days vs. 5.3 days)(P<0.05) and had a faster recovery to normal activity (7.6 days vs. 13.6 days)(P<0.05). Circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy controlled the symptoms of prolapse, pain, and bleeding in all patients. There were 2 cases of urinary retention in both groups, respectively, but there were no postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: Even though long term follow up is required, no major complications were observed in our series. The results of our experience for circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy appear encouraging. We assume that circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safer and faster technique which can replace conventional hemorrhoidectomy techniques.

Keyword

Circumferential stapled hemorrhoidectomy; PPH (Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids); Conventional hemorrhoidectomy

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, Spinal
Follow-Up Studies
Hemorrhage
Hemorrhoidectomy*
Hemorrhoids
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Length of Stay
Pain, Postoperative
Prolapse
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urinary Retention
Wounds and Injuries
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr