Tuberc Respir Dis.  2012 Apr;72(4):367-373.

Clinical Features according to the Frequency of Acute Exacerbation in COPD

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea. ljd8611@empal.com
  • 2Clinical Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
  • 4Department of Rehabilitation, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is now regarded as a heterogenous disease, with variable phenotypes. Acute exacerbation of COPD is a major event that alters the natural course of disease. The frequency of COPD exacerbation is variable among patients. We analyzed clinical features, according to the frequency of acute exacerbation in COPD.
METHODS
Sixty patients, who visited Gyeongsang National University Hospital from March 2010 to October 2010, were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups, according to their frequency of acute exacerbation. Frequent exacerbator is defined as the patient who has two or more exacerbation per one year. We reviewed patients' medical records and investigated modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, smoking history and frequency of acute exacerbation. We also conducted pulmonary function test and 6-minute walking test, calculated body mass index, degree of airway obstruction and dyspnea and exercise capacity (BODE) index and measured CD146 cells in the peripheral blood.
RESULTS
The number of frequent exacerbators and infrequent exacerbators was 20 and 40, respectively. The frequent exacerbator group had more severe airway obstruction (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], 45% vs. 65.3%, p=0.001; FEV1/forced vital capacity, 44.3% vs. 50.5%, p=0.046). MMRC dyspnea scale and BODE index were significantly higher in the frequent exacerbator group (1.8 vs. 1.1, p=0.016; 3.9 vs. 2.1, p=0.014, respectively). The fraction of CD146 cells significantly increased in the frequent exacerbator group (2.0 vs. 1.0, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Frequent exacerbator had more severe airway obstruction and higher symptom score and BODE index. However, circulating endothelial cells measured by CD146 needed to be confirmed in the future.

Keyword

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Phenotype; Endothelial Cells

MeSH Terms

Airway Obstruction
Body Mass Index
Dyspnea
Endothelial Cells
Humans
Medical Records
Phenotype
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Respiratory Function Tests
Smoke
Smoking
Vital Capacity
Walking
Smoke

Figure

  • Figure 1 Comparison of FEV1 (% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (%) between frequentand infrequent exacerbator (45.0±17.2 vs. 65.3±21.8, p=0.001 and 44.3±11.9 vs. 50.5±10.8, p=0.046). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity.

  • Figure 2 Comparison of MMRC dyspnea scale (1.8±1.1 vs. 1.1±1.0, p=0.016), 6-MWT (395.5±144.2 vs. 438.8±108.8, p=0.198), body mass index (21.3±2.4 vs. 22.6±3.9, p=0.162) and BODE index (3.9±2.9 vs. 2.1±2.3, p=0.014) between frequent and infrequent exacerbator. MMRC: modified Medical Research Council; 6-MWT: 6-minute walking test; BODE: body mass index, degree of airway obstruction and dyspnea and exercise capacity.

  • Figure 3 Comparison of CD146 between frequent and infrequent exacerbator (2.0±0.4 vs. 1.0±0.5, p<0.001).


Reference

1. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Buist SA, Calverley P, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007. 176:532–555.
2. Friedlander AL, Lynch D, Dyar LA, Bowler RP. Phenotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD. 2007. 4:355–384.
3. Ståhl E, Lindberg A, Jansson SA, Rönmark E, Svensson K, Andersson F, et al. Health-related quality of life is related to COPD disease severity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005. 3:56.
4. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, Montes de Oca M, Mendez RA, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004. 350:1005–1012.
5. Ong KC, Earnest A, Lu SJ. A multidimensional grading system (BODE index) as predictor of hospitalization for COPD. Chest. 2005. 128:3810–3816.
6. Soler-Cataluña JJ, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Frequent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbators: how much real, how much fictitious? COPD. 2010. 7:276–284.
7. Huertas A, Palange P. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and chronic pulmonary diseases. Eur Respir J. 2011. 37:426–431.
8. Sala E, Villena C, Balaguer C, Ríos A, Fernández-Palomeque C, Cosío BG, et al. Abnormal levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells during exacerbations of COPD. Lung. 2010. 188:331–338.
9. Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, Locantore N, Müllerova H, Tal-Singer R, et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2010. 363:1128–1138.
10. Miravitlles M, Ferrer M, Pont A, Zalacain R, Alvarez-Sala JL, Masa F, et al. Effect of exacerbations on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 2 year follow up study. Thorax. 2004. 59:387–395.
11. Cote CG, Dordelly LJ, Celli BR. Impact of COPD exacerbations on patient-centered outcomes. Chest. 2007. 131:696–704.
12. Hodgev VA, Kostianev SS, Marinov BA. Correlation of frequency of exacerbations with the BODE index in COPD patients. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2006. 48:18–22.
13. Donaldson GC, Wedzicha JA. COPD exacerbations. 1: Epidemiology. Thorax. 2006. 61:164–168.
14. Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, Yates JC, Agusti A, Bakke P, et al. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011. 365:1184–1192.
15. Au DH, Bryson CL, Chien JW, Sun H, Udris EM, Evans LE, et al. The effects of smoking cessation on the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. 24:457–463.
16. Erdbruegger U, Haubitz M, Woywodt A. Circulating endothelial cells: a novel marker of endothelial damage. Clin Chim Acta. 2006. 373:17–26.
17. Mutin M, Canavy I, Blann A, Bory M, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. Direct evidence of endothelial injury in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina by demonstration of circulating endothelial cells. Blood. 1999. 93:2951–2958.
18. Bull TM, Golpon H, Hebbel RP, Solovey A, Cool CD, Tuder RM, et al. Circulating endothelial cells in pulmonary hypertension. Thromb Haemost. 2003. 90:698–703.
19. Nadar SK, Lip GY, Lee KW, Blann AD. Circulating endothelial cells in acute ischaemic stroke. Thromb Haemost. 2005. 94:707–712.
20. Camoin-Jau L, Kone-Paut I, Chabrol B, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. Circulating endothelial cells in Behcet's disease with cerebral thrombophlebitis. Thromb Haemost. 2000. 83:631–632.
21. Clancy RM. Circulating endothelial cells and vascular injury in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2000. 2:39–43.
22. Mutunga M, Fulton B, Bullock R, Batchelor A, Gascoigne A, Gillespie JI, et al. Circulating endothelial cells in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001. 163:195–200.
23. Beerepoot LV, Mehra N, Vermaat JS, Zonnenberg BA, Gebbink MF, Voest EE. Increased levels of viable circulating endothelial cells are an indicator of progressive disease in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2004. 15:139–145.
24. Peinado VI, Pizarro S, Barberà JA. Pulmonary vascular involvement in COPD. Chest. 2008. 134:808–814.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr