Allergy Asthma Immunol Res.  2013 Mar;5(2):113-115. 10.4168/aair.2013.5.2.113.

A Case of Levofloxacin-Induced Anaphylaxis With Elevated Serum Tryptase Levels

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. sanghakim@yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

Levofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone and L-isomer of the racemate ofloxacin, has been approved for the treatment of acute and chronic bacterial infections. Gastrointestinal complaints are the most frequently reported adverse drug reactions to fluoroquinolones. Other adverse events include headache, dizziness, increased liver enzyme levels, photosensitivity, tachycardia, QT prolongation, and eruptions. Anaphylaxis has been documented as a rare adverse drug reaction to levofloxacin; however, diagnostic tests are needed to evaluate whether these reactions are the result of levofloxacin treatment. While the results of skin tests are considered unreliable due to false-positive responses, the oral provocation test is currently considered to be the most reliable test. Tryptase, a neutral protease, is the dominant protein component of secretory granules in human mast cells, and an increased serum concentration of tryptase is a highly sensitive indicator of anaphylaxis. Herein, we report a case of levofloxacin-induced anaphylaxis in which the patient exhibited elevated serum tryptase levels and a positive oral levofloxacin challenge test result. As anaphylaxis is potentially life-threatening, the administration of fluoroquinolones to patients who have experienced a prior reaction to this type of agent should be avoided.

Keyword

Anaphylaxis; drug hypersensitivity; fluoroquinolones; levofloxacin; provocation tests; tryptase

MeSH Terms

Anaphylaxis
Bacterial Infections
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Dizziness
Drug Hypersensitivity
Drug Toxicity
Fluoroquinolones
Headache
Humans
Liver
Mast Cells
Ofloxacin
Secretory Vesicles
Skin Tests
Tachycardia
Tryptases
Fluoroquinolones
Ofloxacin
Tryptases

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Following the oral provocation test, the patient's FEV1 and PEFR were measured. The patient's PEFR dropped to as low as 28% of the baseline value after 3 hr. The patient's FEV1 dropped to as low as 62% of the baseline value after 3.5 hr. Normal FEV1 and PEFR values were gradually restored following treatment. Ultimately, the patient's baseline FEV1 and PEFR levels were attained.

  • Fig. 2 (A) A skin rash appeared on the patient's face 3.5 hr after the oral provocation test. (B) A skin rash with an itching sensation developed over the patient's entire body.


Cited by  1 articles

Overview of anaphylaxis in Korea: diagnosis and management
Gwang Cheon Jang, Yoon-Seok Chang, Sun Hee Choi, Woo-Jung Song, Soo-Young Lee, Hae-Sim Park, Hye-Ryun Kang, Yeong-Min Ye, Hyun-Jung Jin, Mi Yong Shin, Soo-Jin Lee, Hye One Kim, Jihyun Kim, Jae-Woo Jung, Hee-Bom Moon, Youngmin Ahn
Allergy Asthma Respir Dis. 2013;1(3):181-196.    doi: 10.4168/aard.2013.1.3.181.


Reference

1. Croom KF, Goa KL. Levofloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the United States. Drugs. 2003. 63:2769–2802.
2. Lipsky BA, Baker CA. Fluoroquinolone toxicity profiles: a review focusing on newer agents. Clin Infect Dis. 1999. 28:352–364.
3. Smythe MA, Cappelletty DM. Anaphylactoid reaction to levofloxacin. Pharmacotherapy. 2000. 20:1520–1523.
4. Takahama H, Tsutsumi Y, Kubota Y. Anaphylaxis due to levofloxacin. Int J Dermatol. 2005. 44:789–790.
5. Sachs B, Riegel S, Seebeck J, Beier R, Schichler D, Barger A, Merk HF, Erdmann S. Fluoroquinolone-associated anaphylaxis in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports in Germany: differences in reporting rates between individual fluoroquinolones and occurrence after first-ever use. Drug Saf. 2006. 29:1087–1100.
6. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, Motala C, Ortega Martell JA, Platts-Mills TA, Ring J, Thien F, Van Cauwenberge P, Williams HC. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004. 113:832–836.
7. Aranda A, Mayorga C, Ariza A, Doña I, Rosado A, Blanca-Lopez N, Andreu I, Torres MJ. In vitro evaluation of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones. Allergy. 2011. 66:247–254.
8. Manfredi M, Severino M, Testi S, Macchia D, Ermini G, Pichler WJ, Campi P. Detection of specific IgE to quinolones. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004. 113:155–160.
9. Borchers AT, Naguwa SM, Keen CL, Gershwin ME. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. Compr Ther. 2004. 30:111–120.
10. Kelesidis T, Fleisher J, Tsiodras S. Anaphylactoid reaction considered ciprofloxacin related: a case report and literature review. Clin Ther. 2010. 32:515–526.
11. Campi P, Pichler WJ. Quinolone hypersensitivity. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003. 3:275–281.
12. Schwartz LB, Metcalfe DD, Miller JS, Earl H, Sullivan T. Tryptase levels as an indicator of mast-cell activation in systemic anaphylaxis and mastocytosis. N Engl J Med. 1987. 316:1622–1626.
13. Brown SG, Blackman KE, Heddle RJ. Can serum mast cell tryptase help diagnose anaphylaxis? Emerg Med Australas. 2004. 16:120–124.
14. Payne V, Kam PC. Mast cell tryptase: a review of its physiology and clinical significance. Anaesthesia. 2004. 59:695–703.
15. Shiohara T, Kano Y. A complex interaction between drug allergy and viral infection. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007. 33:124–133.
16. Pirmohamed M, Park BK. HIV and drug allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001. 1:311–316.
17. Hashimoto K, Yasukawa M, Tohyama M. Human herpesvirus 6 and drug allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003. 3:255–260.
Full Text Links
  • AAIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr