J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2010 Jun;51(6):802-808. 10.3341/jkos.2010.51.6.802.

Intraindividual Comparison of ICL and Toric ICL Implantation in the Correction of High Myopia With Astigmatism

Affiliations
  • 1Sung Mo Eye Hospital, Busan, Korea. eye0775@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
We compared intra-individual visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantable contact lens (ICL) and Toric ICL implantation.
METHODS
Twenty-eight eyes of 14 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. One eye of each patient was assigned to ICL (ICL Group), and the contralateral eye was allocated to Toric ICL (Toric ICL Group). All patients were examined for visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, slit lamp measurements, and satisfaction one week, one month, two months, and six months postoperatively.
RESULTS
Mean spherical equivalents of the two groups were corrected from -7.83D (ICL Group) and -5.55D (Toric ICL Group) to 0.13D and 0.20D, respectively, and the mean refractive cylinders were corrected from 0.92D and 2.60D to 0.42D and 0.27D, respectively, at six months postoperatively. The myopias of these two groups and the astigmatism of the Toric ICL group were effectively corrected. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of the two groups were 1.02 and 1.05, respectively, at six months postoperatively. The safety index, efficacy index, predictability, and stability were favorable. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative UCVA, intraocular pressure(IOP), vaulting, noticeable complications, or patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS
The results show ICL implantation is effective treatment for high myopia, and Toric ICL implantation is a viable surgical option for the treatment of compound myopia astigmatism. Selection of proper phakic intraocular lens(IOL) is recommended for correcting astigmatism.

Keyword

High myopia with astigmatism; ICL; Toric ICL

MeSH Terms

Astigmatism
Eye
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Lenses, Intraocular
Myopia
Patient Satisfaction
Retrospective Studies
Visual Acuity

Figure

  • Figure 1. Attempted vs achieved spherical equivalent at 6 months after ICL and Toric ICL implantation.

  • Figure 2. Patient satisfaction of ICL and Toric ICL.


Cited by  1 articles

The Benefits of One Day, One Eye Surgery in Bilateral ICL Implantation
Wook Kyum Kim, Eun Young Cho, Hee Sun Kim, Deok Su Kim, Jin Kuk Kim
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013;54(7):1019-1024.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.7.1019.


Reference

References

1. Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005; 50:549–87.
Article
2. Maloney RK, Nguyen LH, John ME. Artisan phakic intraocular lens for myopia:short-term results of a prospective, multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1631–41.
3. Stulting RD, John ME, Maloney RK, et al. Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation. Results of the United States Food And Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:464–72.
4. Bartels MC, Saxena R, van den Berg TJ, et al. The influence of incision-induced astigmatism and axial lens position on the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:1110–7.
Article
5. Coullet J, Guell JL, Fournie P, et al. Iris-supported phakic lenses (rigid vs foldable version) for treating moderately high myopia: randomized paired eye comparison. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:909–16.
Article
6. Chun YS, Lee JH, Lee JM, et al. Outcomes after implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:480–9.
7. Han SY, Lee KH. Long term effect of ICL implantation to treat high myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:465–72.
8. Sanders DR, Brown DC, Martin RG, et al. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: phase I FDA clinical study with 6 month followup. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:607–11.
9. Sanders DR, Vukich JA, Doney K, Gaston M. U.S. Food and Drug administration clinical trial of the implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:255–66.
Article
10. Sanders DR, Schneider D, Martin R, et al. Toric Implantable Collamer Lens for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:54–61.
Article
11. Uusitalo RJ, Aine E, Sen NH, Laatikainen L. Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:29–36.
Article
12. Assetto V, Benedetti S, Pesando P. Collamer intraocular contact lens to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:551–6.
Article
13. Arne JL, Lesueur LC. Phakic posterior chamber lenses for high myopia: functional and anatomical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:369–74.
Article
14. Yoon JM, Moon SJ, Lee KH. Clinical Outcomes of Toric Implantable Collamer Lens implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:839–51.
Article
15. Chang J, Lau S. Toric Implantable Collamer Lens for high myopic astigmatic Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2340–7.
Article
16. Jimenez-Alfaro I, Benitez del Castillo JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. Safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of high myopia. Anterior segment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:90–9.
17. Mendicute J, Irigoyen C, Ruiz M, et al. Toric intraocular lens versus op-posite clear corneal incisions to correct astigmatism in eyes having cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35:451–8.
Article
18. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Komatsu M. Comparison of Collamer toric implantable contact lens implantation and wave-front-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1687–93.
19. Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable contact lens and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Cornea. 2003; 22:324–31.
Article
20. Sanders D, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea. 2006; 25:1139–46.
Article
21. Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Incidence of lens opacities and clinically significant cataracts with the implantable contact lens: comparison of two lens designs. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:673–82.
Article
22. Gonvers M, Bornet C, Othenin-Girard P. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: relationship of vaulting to cataract formation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:918–24.
23. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, et al. Long-term results of implantation of phakic posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:2269–76.
Article
24. Sarikkola A-U, Sen HN, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Traumatic cataract and other adverse events with the implantable contact lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:511–24.
Article
25. Lege BA, Haigis W, Neuhann TF, Bauer MH. Age-related behavior of posterior chamber lenses in myopic phakic eyes during accommodation measured by anterior segment partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:999–1006.
Article
26. Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Randomized prospective comparison of Visian Toric Implantable Collamer Lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:853–67.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr