J Korean Med Assoc.  2013 Apr;56(4):292-298. 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.4.292.

Drug abuse associated with procedural sedation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shhong7272@gmail.com

Abstract

Procedural sedation is now becoming more popular in South Korea along with the increases in cosmetic procedures and surgery, gastrointestinal endoscopy, and minimally invasive surgery, which have been accompanied by a surge in propofol abuse. The mechanism of potential abuse of sedatives and hypnotics share the common feature of all addictive drugs, in that they increase dopamine concentrations in target structures in the mesolimbic dopamine system. The abuse of sedatives and hypnotics occupies a small proportion of all substance abuse; however, propofol abuse is sharply increasing and is closely associated with procedural sedation in South Korea. Previous case reports have indicated that the majority of propofol abusers were health-care providers; however, recreational use of propofol is spreading among the general public. Lay people become addicted to propofol through repetitive procedural sedation or wrongful use by clinicians who are enticed by the promise of monetary gain. Illicit distribution of propofol accelerates abuse by lay people. The extremely narrow safety margin of propofol may cause a large number of fatal cases. Therefore, nationwide establishment of a policy to prevent the spread of propofol abuse is urgently needed.

Keyword

Drug abuse; Hypnotic; Propofol; Sedation; Sedative

MeSH Terms

Cosmetics
Dopamine
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Propofol
Republic of Korea
Substance-Related Disorders
Cosmetics
Dopamine
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Propofol

Figure

  • Figure 1 Schematic diagram describing the circuit of the mesolimbic dopamine system. The reward system originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which is composed of two major cell types, the dopamine neurons and the γ-aminobutyricacid (GABA) neurons. The dopamine neurons (blue) project to the ventral striatum, the nucleus accumbens (NAc), the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the hippocampus. The VTA receives inhibitory projections (red) back from the NAc and from the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPT) and excitatory projections (green) from the PFC, the PPT, the amygdala, the lateral hypothalamus (LH), the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). It also receives local inhibitory feedback from the GABA interneurons in the VTA (from Tan KR, et al. Trends Neurosci 2011;34:188-197, with permission from Elsevier) [8].


Cited by  2 articles

Criminal liability of medical professionals
Kyung Hwan Lee, Para Choi
J Korean Med Assoc. 2013;56(8):655-664.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.8.655.

Propofol abuse among healthcare professionals
Sang Hyun Hong
J Korean Med Assoc. 2013;56(9):771-777.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.9.771.


Reference

1. Roh S, Park JM, Kim DJ. A case of propofol dependence after repeated use for endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011. 43:Suppl 2 UCTN. E362.
Article
2. Kim DK. Propofol use for sedation or sedation for propofol use? J Anesth. 2012. 26:289–291.
Article
3. Lee JW, Lee KY. Safe sedation in a private clinic. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011. 54:1179–1188.
Article
4. Ahn W. Study of the regulatory affairs and the abuse investigation on the propofol [Internet]. 2010. cited 2013 Jan 26. Cheongwon: National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation;Available from: http://report.ndsl.kr/repDetail.do?cn=TRKO201000015755.
5. Jones JD, Mogali S, Comer SD. Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012. 125:8–18.
Article
6. Hayashi K, Suwannawong P, Ti L, Kaplan K, Wood E, Kerr T. High rates of midazolam injection and associated harms in Bangkok, Thailand. Addiction. 2012. 12. 24. [Epub]. DOI: 10.1111/add.12094.
Article
7. Chao J, Nestler EJ. Molecular neurobiology of drug addiction. Annu Rev Med. 2004. 55:113–132.
Article
8. Tan KR, Rudolph U, Luscher C. Hooked on benzodiazepines: GABAA receptor subtypes and addiction. Trends Neurosci. 2011. 34:188–197.
Article
9. Roussin A, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Pharmacological and clinical evidences on the potential for abuse and dependence of propofol: a review of the literature. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007. 21:459–466.
Article
10. Pain L, Gobaille S, Schleef C, Aunis D, Oberling P. In vivo dopamine measurements in the nucleus accumbens after nonanesthetic and anesthetic doses of propofol in rats. Anesth Analg. 2002. 95:915–919.
Article
11. Pain L, Oberling P, Sandner G, Di Scala G. Effect of propofol on affective state as assessed by place conditioning paradigm in rats. Anesthesiology. 1996. 85:121–128.
Article
12. Pain L, Oberling P, Sandner G, Di Scala G. Effect of midazolam on propofol-induced positive affective state assessed by place conditioning in rats. Anesthesiology. 1997. 87:935–943.
Article
13. LeSage MG, Stafford D, Glowa JR. Abuse liability of the anesthetic propofol: self-administration of propofol in rats under fixed-ratio schedules of drug delivery. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000. 153:148–154.
Article
14. Weerts EM, Ator NA, Griffiths RR. Comparison of the intravenous reinforcing effects of propofol and methohexital in baboons. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999. 57:51–60.
Article
15. Zacny JP, Lichtor JL, Thompson W, Apfelbaum JL. Propofol at a subanesthetic dose may have abuse potential in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1993. 77:544–552.
Article
16. Wilson C, Canning P, Caravati EM. The abuse potential of propofol. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010. 48:165–170.
Article
17. US Department of Health and Human Services. Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: summary of national findings [Internet]. 2012. cited 2013 Jan 26. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration;Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k11Results/NSDUHresults2011.htm.
18. Beaujouan L, Czernichow S, Pourriat JL, Bonnet F. Prevalence and risk factors for substance abuse and dependence among anaesthetists: a national survey. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005. 24:471–479.
19. Morgan CJ, Curran HV. Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs. Ketamine use: a review. Addiction. 2012. 107:27–38.
Article
20. Wischmeyer PE, Johnson BR, Wilson JE, Dingmann C, Bachman HM, Roller E, Tran ZV, Henthorn TK. A survey of propofol abuse in academic anesthesia programs. Anesth Analg. 2007. 105:1066–1071.
Article
21. Payne K, Moore EW, Elliott RA, Pollard BJ, McHugh GA. Anaesthesia for day case surgery: a survey of adult clinical practice in the UK. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003. 20:311–324.
Article
22. Lee YM. Illegal distribution of propofol. The Kookmin Ilbo. 2012. 10. 05.
23. Ahn SY. Propofol mainly purchased by clinics. The Nocut News. 2012. 10. 14.
24. Follette JW, Farley WJ. Anesthesiologist addicted to propofol. Anesthesiology. 1992. 77:817–818.
Article
25. Stocks G. Abuse of propofol by anesthesia providers: the case for reclassification as a controlled substance. J Addict Nurs. 2011. 22:57–62.
Article
26. Park JH, Kim HJ, Seo JS. Medicolegal review of deaths related to propofol administration: analysis of 36 autopsied cases. Korean J Leg Med. 2012. 36:56–62.
Article
27. Lee S, Lee MS, Kim YA, Ahn W, Lee HC. Propofol abuse of the medical personnel in operation room in Korea. Korean J Leg Med. 2010. 34:101–107.
28. Kim JH. Sharp increase in propofol thefts. Health Korea News. 2012. 10. 11.
29. Fritz GA, Niemczyk WE. Propofol dependency in a lay person. Anesthesiology. 2002. 96:505–506.
Article
30. Koopmann A, von der Goltz C, Hermann D, Kiefer F. Propofol addiction initiated by anesthetic use. Am J Psychiatry. 2011. 168:211–212.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr