J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2005 Jul;30(4):294-302. 10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.294.

A comparative study on the canal configuration after shaping by ProFile, ProTaper(TM) and K-Flexofile in simulated canals with different angles of curvature

• Lee BK
• Kim DJ
• Hwang YC
• Hwang IN
• Oh WM

• KMID: 2175694
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.294

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the canal configuration after shaping by ProFile, ProTaper and K-Flexofile in simulated resin canals with different angles of curvature. Three types of instruments were used : ProFile, ProTaper, K-Flexofile. Simulated root canals, which were made of epoxy resin, were prepared by ProFile, ProTaper with rotary instrument using a crown-down pressureless technique, and hand instrumentation was performed by K-Flexofile using a step-back technique. All simulated canals were prepared up to size 25 file at end-point of preparation. Pre and post instrumentation images were recorded with Scanner. Assessment of canal shape was completed with Image Analysis program. Measurements were made at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 mm from the apex. At each level, outer canal width, inner canal width, total canal width, and amount of transportation from original axis were recorded. Instrument deformation and fracture were recorded. Data were analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA analysis of variance and the Sheffe's test. The result was that ProFile and ProTaper maintain original canal shape regardless of the increase of angle of curvature than K-Flexofile. ProFile show significantly less canal transportation and maintained original canal shape better than ProTaper.

Keyword

Ni-Ti file; Canal curvature; ProFile; ProTaper; K-Flexofile; Simulated resin canal

MeSH Terms

Axis, Cervical Vertebra
Dental Instruments
Dental Pulp Cavity
Transportation