1. Mandel E, Yazdi MA, Benhamou LM, Lachkar T, Mesgouez C, Sobel M. Rotary Ni-Ti profile systems for preparing curved canals in resin blocks : influence of operator on instrument breakage. Int Endod J. 1999. 32:436–443.
Article
2. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrument. J Endod. 1987. 13:243–245.
3. Royal JR, Donnelly JC. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-forced instrumentation with three difference file type. J Endod. 1995. 21:300–304.
Article
4. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:173–176.
Article
5. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988. 14:346–351.
Article
6. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J. 2000. 33:248–254.
Article
7. Park HS, Lee MG, Kim JJ, Im YJ, Jang MS, Lee JY. A study on the shape of a canal prepared with 'three-file' technique in a curved canal. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2000. 25:494–498.
8. Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod. 1997. 23:232–235.
Article
9. Hata GI, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod. 2002. 28:316–321.
Article
10. Bishop K, Dummer PMH. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:25–34.
Article
11. Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001. 91:715–718.
Article
12. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996. 22:369–375.
Article
13. Kim YT, Beak SH, Bae KS, Lim SS, Yoon SH. A Comparison of Three Stainless Steel Instruments in the Preparation of Curved Root Canals in vitro. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2001. 26:9–15.
14. Dummer PMH, Alodeh MHA. A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. Int Endod J. 1991. 24:63–66.
Article
15. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000. 26:719–723.
Article
16. Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001. 92:215–220.
Article
17. Bonetti Filho I, Miranda Esberard R, de Toledo Leonardo R, del Rio CE. Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre- and postinstrumentation. J Endod. 1998. 24:461–464.
Article
18. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:1–7.
19. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of Nickel-Titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997. 23:77–85.
Article
20. Schäfer E, Schlingemann R. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2003. 36:208–217.
Article
21. Versumer J, Hülsmann M, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using ProFile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2002. 35:37–46.
Article
22. Park HS, Lee MG, Kim JJ, Lee JY. A study on the shape of a canal prepared with profiles in a curved canal. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999. 24:633–638.
23. Im GA, Yoon SH. A Comparison of Stainless Steel K-file, Profile .04, and Quantec LX Instruments to Shape Curved Root Canals in vitro. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2000. 25:133–143.
24. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:8–15.
Article
25. Lee SJ, Shin YG, Hwang HG. Transportation of curved canal after canal enlargement according to filing instruments. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999. 24:503–510.