J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2015 Dec;56(12):1974-1978. 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.12.1974.

A Case of Acute Bilateral Solar Retinopathy Diagnosed with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Myongji Hospital, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea. kimdk89@empal.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To report a case of acute bilateral solar retinopathy diagnosed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
CASE SUMMARY
A 74-year-old female patient consulted for amblyopia and metamorphopsia at a local hospital. On the patient's first visit, there were no abnormal findings based on slit lamp microscope. Additional examinations were conducted since the patient complained of metamorphopsia with visual acuity and corrected vision. Fundus photography and SD-OCT examination showed symmetrical lesions near the bilateral macula. Several evaluations of the patient's medical history confirmed that the patient was exposed directly to the sun for 30 minutes. One month after the first visit, visual acuity improved but metamorphopsia remained unchanged. Lesion status could not be confirmed by fundus photography. There was no abnormal finding on fluorescence angiography. SD-OCT examination still showed bilateral symmetric disruption of the outer retina but with no significant interval change.
CONCLUSIONS
In the present case, the patient with bilateral intraocular lenses who complained of acute binocular amblyopia was diagnosed accurately through SD-OCT tests for bilateral symmetric disruption on the outer retina and repetitive evaluations of patient's medical history.

Keyword

Acute bilateral solar retinopathy; Disruption; Patient's medical history; Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)

MeSH Terms

Aged
Amblyopia
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Humans
Lenses, Intraocular
Photography
Retina
Solar System
Telescopes
Tomography, Optical Coherence*
Vision Disorders
Visual Acuity

Figure

  • Figure 1. Fundus photography and SD-OCT examination. At patient’s first visit, fundus photography shows yellowish-white spot pigmentation in the central fovea (A, B). SD-OCT shows bilateral symmetric disruption of the outer retina (C, D). SD-OCT = spec-tral domain optical coherence tomography.

  • Figure 2. Fundus photography and SD-OCT examination. One month after the first visit, status of lesion cannot not be confirmed by fundus photography (A, B). SD-OCT examination shows bilateral symmetric disruption of the outer retina with no difference (C, D). SD-OCT = spectral domain optical coherence tomography.


Reference

References

1. Ritchey CL, Ewald RA. Sun gazing as the cause of foveomacular retinitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970; 70:491–7.
2. Kerr LM, Little HL. Foveomacular retinitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966; 76:498–504.
Article
3. Kuming BS. Foveomacular retinitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986; 70:816–8.
Article
4. Dhir SP, Gupta A, Jain IS. Eclipse retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981; 65:42–5.
Article
5. Thanos S, Heiduschka P, Romann I. Exposure to a solar eclipse causes neuronal death in the retina. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239:794–800.
Article
6. Wong SC, Eke T, Ziakas NG. Eclipse burns: a prospective study of solar retinopathy following the 1999 solar eclipse. Lancet 2001; 357. 199–200.
Article
7. Freedman J, Gombos GM. Fluorescein fundus angiography in self-induced solar retinopathy. A case report. Can J Ophthalmol. 1971; 6:124–7.
8. Wergeland FL Jr, Brenner EH. Solar retinopathy and foveomacular retinitis. Ann Ophthalmol. 1975; 7:495–8. 501-3.
9. Cho HJ, Yoo ES, Kim CG, Kim JW. Comparison of spectral-do-main and time-domain optical coherence tomography in solar retinopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011; 25:278–81.
Article
10. Jain A, Desai RU, Charalel RA. . Solar retinopathy: compar-ison of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein an-giography (FA). Retina. 2009; 29:1340–5.
11. Boldrey EE, Little HL, Flocks M, Vassiliadis A. Retinal injury due to industrial laser burns. Ophthalmology. 1981; 88:101–7.
Article
12. Borges J, Li ZY, Tso MO. Effects of repeated photic exposures on the monkey macula. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108:727–33.
Article
13. Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE. Sunlight and age-related macular degeneration. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:514–8.
14. Curtin TL, Boyden DG. Reflected laser beam causing accidental burn of retina. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 65:188–9.
Article
15. Friedman E, Kuwabara T. The retinal pigment epithelium. IV. The damaging effects of radiant energy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968; 80:265–79.
16. Kuwabara T, Gorn RA. Retinal damage by visible light. An elec-tron microscopic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968; 79:69–78.
17. Kuwabara T. Retinal recovery from exposure to light. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970; 70:187–98.
Article
18. Tso MO, Woodford BJ. Effect of photic injury on the retinal tissues. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:952–63.
Article
19. Lanum J. The damaging effects of light on the retina. Empirical findings, theoretical and practical implications. Surv Ophthalmol. 1978; 22:221–49.
Article
20. de La Paz MA, D’amico DJ. Photic retinopathy. Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Basic Sciences. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;1994. p. 1032–7.
21. Chang W. A case of chronic monocular solar retinopathy. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2007; 24:329–32.
Article
22. Kim KH, Song BJ, Choi YI. A case of solar retinopathy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1864–9.
23. Devadason DS, Mahmood S, Stanga PE, Bishop PN. Solar retinop-athy in a patient with bipolar affective disorder. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:247.
Article
24. Zigman S. Effects of near ultraviolet radiation on the lens and retina. Doc Ophthalmol. 1983; 55:375–91.
Article
25. Mainster MA. The spectra, classification, and rationale of ultra-violet-protective intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986; 102:722–32.
Article
26. West SK, Rosenthal FS, Bressler NM. . Exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:875–9.
Article
27. Sliney DH. Eye protective techniques for bright light. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:937–44.
Article
28. Levy S, Sheck L, Guest S. OCT appearances in acute solar retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012; 130:1540.
Article
29. Jacobs NA, Headon M, Rosen ES. Solar retinopathy in the Manchester area. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1985; 104:(Pt 6). 625–8.
30. Comander J, Gardiner M, Loewenstein J. High-resolution optical coherence tomography findings in solar maculopathy and the dif-ferential diagnosis of outer retinal holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152:413–9.e6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr