Korean J Med.
1999 Nov;57(5):896-905.
Comparison of balloon angioplasty , stent insertion and medical therapy in the treatment of single LAD lesion
- Affiliations
-
- 1Cardiology Division Yonsei Cardiovascular Center, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
-
With recent advances in transarterial interventional technique, there is a tendency to treat
single LAD lesion with balloon angioplasty or stent insertion rather than with medical therapy
alone. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of such
interventional therapy.
METHODS
Subjects are comprised of patients who underwent coronary angiogram from 1993 to 1996
and diagnosed as having single LAD lesion without decrease of left ventricular fuction.
The incidence of major ischemic complications, revascularization and reduction of angina
pectoris after different therapeutic strategies in these patients are evaluated.
RESULT: 1) There was total of 190 patients. Patients receiving medical therapy, balloon
angioplasty and stent insertion were 70, 75, and 45 respectively. There was no significant
difference in mean age, sex ratio, and risk factors of coronary artery occlusive disease
between each groups. 2) The medical therapy group(30%) had a significantly lower incidence of
proximal stenosis lesion compared to the balloon angioplasty group (45%) and stent insertion
group(52%) according to the location of the lesion(p<0.05). The lesion characteristics
according to the AHA/ACC criteria showed that the proportion of type A lesion was significantly
higher in the balloon angioplasty group(33.3%) compared to the medical therapy group(8.6%) and
stent insertion group(13.3%), whereas the proportion of type C lesion was significantly higher
in the medical therapy group(41.4%) compared to the balloon angioplasty group(14.3%) and stent
insertion group(22.2%). 3) The incidence of ischemic complication were low with 9 out of total
190 patients during follow up consisting of 2 cases of cardiogenic death(1.1%) and 7 cases of
acute myocardial infarction(3.7%).
4) During the follow-up period revascularization was performed in 10% of medical therapy group,
27% of balloon angioplasty group and 22% of stent insertion group. There was higher rate of
revascularization in patients who received interventional therapy. 5) During the mean follow-up
period of 38 months, event-free survival rate was 85% in the patient group receiving medical
therapy, 71% in the patient group undergoing balloon angioplasty and 74% in the patient group
undergoing stent insertion. There was lower incidence of major events in medical therapy
patients, but the difference of the rate among each group was not significant. In considering
the patients with proximal LAD stenotic lesion, event-free survival rate was 73% in medical
therapy group, 75% in balloon angioplasty group and 81% in stent insertion group, but the
difference between each groups did not show any significant difference. 6) Follow-up of each
study groups at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years showed that the proportion of chest pain-free
patients in balloon angioplasty and stent insertion group were higher than those in medical
therapy group despite the lack of statistical significance(p>0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients
with single LAD stenotic lesion interventional therapies such as balloon angioplasty and stent
insertion might be more effective without statistical signigicance in reducing chest pain
compared to medical therapy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ischemic
complication and rate of revascularization among different study groups. Further studies will
be needed to clarify the beneficial effects of interventional coronary artery therapy such as
improvement of chest pain, increased exercise capacity, and improved quality of life along with
other parameters.