Korean J Urol.  2012 Sep;53(9):598-606. 10.4111/kju.2012.53.9.598.

FAM70B as a Novel Prognostic Marker for Cancer Progression and Cancer-Specific Death in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea. sjyun@chungbuk.ac.kr
  • 2Section of Urologic Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To validate whether FAM70B, which was found in our micro-array profiling as a prognostic marker for cancer survival, could accurately predict prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 124 patients with MIBC were enrolled in this study. The FAM70B expression level was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction by using RNA from tumor tissues. The prognostic effect of FAM70B was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model.
RESULTS
Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a significant difference in progression-free survival (log-rank test, p=0.011) and cancer-specific survival (log-rank test, p=0.017) according to FAM70B gene expression level. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, high FAM70B expression was predictive of cancer progression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.115, p=0.013) and cancer-specific death (HR, 1.925; p=0.033). In the subgroup analysis, high expression of FAM70B was associated with poor cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the patients who underwent cystectomy (log-rank test, p=0.013, p=0.036, p=0.005, respectively). In the chemotherapy group, FAM70B expression was associated with cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival (log-rank test, p=0.013, p=0.042, respectively). Moreover, high FAM70B expression was associated with shorter cancer-specific survival in localized or locally advanced tumor stages (log-rank test, p=0.016).
CONCLUSIONS
We confirmed the significance of FAM70B as a prognostic marker in a validation cohort. Therefore, we propose that the FAM70B gene could be used to more precisely predict cancer progression and cancer-specific death in patients with MIBC.

Keyword

Bladder cancer; Gene expression profiling; Micro-array; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Cohort Studies
Cystectomy
Disease-Free Survival
Gene Expression
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Prognosis
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA
Urinary Bladder
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
RNA

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Effect of FAM70B expression on cancer prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients from original cohorts. (A) Progression-free survival (log-rank test, p=0.005); (B) cancer-specific survival (log-rank test, p=0.013); and (C) overall survival (log-rank test, p=0.008).

  • FIG. 2 Probability of progression and survival according to the FAM70B expression status in independent cohorts. (A) Progression-free survival (log-rank test, p=0.011); (B) cancer-specific survival (log-rank test, p=0.017); and (C) overall survival (log-rank test, p=0.068).

  • FIG. 3 Effect of FAM70B expression on cancer-specific survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, categorized according to radical cystectomy status. (A) Patients who underwent radical cystectomy (log-rank test, p=0.013). (B) Patients who did not undergo radical cystectomy (log-rank test, p=0.0689).

  • FIG. 4 Effect of FAM70B expression on cancer-specific survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, categorized according to chemotherapy status. (A) Patients who received chemotherapy (log-rank test, p=0.013). (B) Patients who did not receive chemotherapy (log-rank test, p=0.511).

  • FIG. 5 Effect of FAM70B expression on cancer-specific survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, categorized according to tumor stage. (A) Patients with localized or locally advanced tumor stage (pT2-3N0M0) (log-rank test, p=0.016). (B) Patients with pT4 or node-positive or metastatic disease (log-rank test, p=0.372).


Reference

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62:10–29. PMID: 22237781.
Article
2. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Lee JY, Seo HG, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2009. Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 44:11–24. PMID: 22500156.
Article
3. Ha YS, Kim MJ, Yoon HY, Kang HW, Kim YJ, Yun SJ, et al. mRNA Expression of S100A8 as a prognostic marker for progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:15–20. PMID: 20414404.
Article
4. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2008; 54:303–314. PMID: 18468779.
Article
5. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2009; 374:239–249. PMID: 19520422.
Article
6. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55:74–108. PMID: 15761078.
Article
7. Kim WJ, Kim EJ, Kim SK, Kim YJ, Ha YS, Jeong P, et al. Predictive value of progression-related gene classifier in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Mol Cancer. 2010; 9:3. PMID: 20059769.
Article
8. Kim YK, Kim WJ. Epigenetic markers as promising prognosticators for bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 2009; 16:17–22. PMID: 18721202.
Article
9. Habuchi T, Marberger M, Droller MJ, Hemstreet GP 3rd, Grossman HB, Schalken JA, et al. Prognostic markers for bladder cancer: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005; 66(6 Suppl 1):64–74. PMID: 16399416.
Article
10. Dyrskjøt L, Zieger K, Real FX, Malats N, Carrato A, Hurst C, et al. Gene expression signatures predict outcome in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: a multicenter validation study. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13:3545–3551. PMID: 17575217.
Article
11. Takata R, Katagiri T, Kanehira M, Tsunoda T, Shuin T, Miki T, et al. Predicting response to methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancers through genome-wide gene expression profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11:2625–2636. PMID: 15814643.
Article
12. Eschrich S, Yang I, Bloom G, Kwong KY, Boulware D, Cantor A, et al. Molecular staging for survival prediction of colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:3526–3535. PMID: 15908663.
Article
13. Kim WJ, Kim SK, Jeong P, Yun SJ, Cho IC, Kim IY, et al. A four-gene signature predicts disease progression in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Mol Med. 2011; 17:478–485. PMID: 21308147.
Article
14. Kim SK, Kim EJ, Leem SH, Ha YS, Kim YJ, Kim WJ. Identification of S100A8-correlated genes for prediction of disease progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10:21. PMID: 20096140.
Article
15. Kim YJ, Ha YS, Kim SK, Yoon HY, Lym MS, Kim MJ, et al. Gene signatures for the prediction of response to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy in primary pT1 bladder cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16:2131–2137. PMID: 20233890.
16. Greene FL. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002; 87:13–15. PMID: 17387902.
17. Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Jakse G, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009; 55:815–825. PMID: 19157687.
Article
18. Catto JW, Azzouzi AR, Rehman I, Feeley KM, Cross SS, Amira N, et al. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:2903–2910. PMID: 15753461.
Article
19. Weinstein JN, Scherf U, Lee JK, Nishizuka S, Gwadry F, Bussey AK, et al. The bioinformatics of microarray gene expression profiling. Cytometry. 2002; 47:46–49. PMID: 11774349.
Article
20. Dyrskjot L, Kruhoffer M, Thykjaer T, Marcussen N, Jensen JL, Moller K, et al. Gene expression in the urinary bladder: a common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:4040–4048. PMID: 15173019.
21. Zhang Z, Karam J, Frenkel E, Sagalowsky A, Hsieh JT. The application of epigenetic modifiers on the treatment of prostate and bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2006; 24:152–160. PMID: 16520279.
Article
22. Chen HY, Yu SL, Chen CH, Chang GC, Chen CY, Yuan A, et al. A five-gene signature and clinical outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:11–20. PMID: 17202451.
Article
23. Lossos IS, Czerwinski DK, Alizadeh AA, Wechser MA, Tibshirani R, Botstein D, et al. Prediction of survival in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma based on the expression of six genes. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:1828–1837. PMID: 15115829.
Article
24. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1999–2009. PMID: 12490681.
Article
25. Beer DG, Kardia SL, Huang CC, Giordano TJ, Levin AM, Misek DE, et al. Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Med. 2002; 8:816–824. PMID: 12118244.
Article
26. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000; 403:503–511. PMID: 10676951.
Article
27. Dyrskjot L, Thykjaer T, Kruhoffer M, Jensen JL, Marcussen N, Hamilton-Dutoit S, et al. Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays. Nat Genet. 2003; 33:90–96. PMID: 12469123.
Article
28. Gerhard DS, Wagner L, Feingold EA, Shenmen CM, Grouse LH, Schuler G, et al. The status, quality, and expansion of the NIH full-length cDNA project: the Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC). Genome Res. 2004; 14(10B):2121–2127. PMID: 15489334.
29. Dunham A, Matthews LH, Burton J, Ashurst JL, Howe KL, Ashcroft KJ, et al. The DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 13. Nature. 2004; 428:522–528. PMID: 15057823.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr