Ann Lab Med.  2023 May;43(3):237-243. 10.3343/alm.2023.43.3.237.

Associations of LDL Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, and Apolipoprotein B With Cardiovascular Disease Occurrence in Adults: Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Despite the superiority of non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) as lipid markers for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), these are only suitable as secondary markers. We compared LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C, and ApoB concentrations with respect to the occurrence of cardiovascular disease in adults enrolled in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES).
Methods
We used information on age; sex; medical history; family history of ASCVD; current lipid-lowering therapy; current smoking status; and creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, and ApoB concentrations from 5,872 KoGES participants without ASCVD. New ASCVD development was monitored during the 8-year follow-up period. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for ASCVD of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and ApoB concentrations were calculated based on the multivariate Cox regression analyses. The participants were also grouped as low and high according to the median values for each lipid marker, and calculated aHRs of each group combined by two lipid makers.
Results
ApoB showed the highest aHR per 1-SD for ASCVD (1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.43), followed by non-HDL-C (1.25; 95% CI, 1.11–1.41) and LDL-C (1.20; 95% CI, 1.06–1.37). The group with low LDL-C and high ApoB concentrations had a significantly higher aHR for ASCVD (1.61; 95% CI, 1.05–2.48) compared to the reference group values (low LDL-C and low ApoB concentrations). The aHR for the group with high LDL-C and low ApoB concentrations was not significant (1.30; 95% CI, 0.79–2.16).
Conclusions
ApoB, non-HDL-C, and LDL-C are independent risk factors for ASCVD. Increases in the aHR per 1-SD for ASCVD were more strongly affected by ApoB, followed by non-HDL-C and LDL-C. Participants with low LDL-C and high ApoB concentrations showed increased ASCVD risk. For individuals with ASCVD risk factors, even those presenting normal LDL-C concentrations, measuring ApoB concentrations can provide useful information for better evaluation of ASCVD risk.

Keyword

Atherosclerosis; LDL; Cholesterol; Apolipoprotein B

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of participant selection. Abbreviation: KoGES, Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

  • Fig. 2 aHRs for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease per 1-standard deviation increase in lipid marker concentrations. Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; Non-HDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; CI, confidence interval.

  • Fig. 3 aHRs of participants grouped by (A) LDL-C and ApoB, (B) LDL-C and non-HDL-C, (C) non-HDL-C and ApoB. Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; CI, confidence interval; non-HDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol.


Cited by  1 articles

Apolipoprotein B, Non-HDL Cholesterol, and LDL Cholesterol as Markers for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment
Yeo-Min Yun
Ann Lab Med. 2023;43(3):221-222.    doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.3.221.


Reference

1. Sampson UK, Fazio S, Linton MF. 2012; Residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal LDL cholesterol reduction with statins: the evidence, etiology, and therapeutic challenges. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 14:1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-011-0219-7. PMID: 22102062. PMCID: PMC3697085.
Article
2. Reith C, Armitage J. 2016; Management of residual risk after statin therapy. Atherosclerosis. 245:161–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.018. PMID: 26722833.
Article
3. Shapiro MD, Fazio S. 2016; From lipids to inflammation: new approaches to reducing atherosclerotic risk. Circ Res. 118:732–49. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306471. PMID: 26892970.
4. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2019; 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 73:3168–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. PMID: 30423391.
5. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2020; 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 41:111–88. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. PMID: 31504418.
6. Verbeek R, Hovingh GK, Boekholdt SM. 2015; Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: current status as cardiovascular marker. Curr Opin Lipidol. 26:502–10. DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000237. PMID: 26780004.
7. Sniderman AD, Thanassoulis G, Glavinovic T, Navar AM, Pencina M, Catapano A, et al. 2019; Apolipoprotein B particles and cardiovascular disease: a narrative review. JAMA Cardiol. 4:1287–95. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3780. PMID: 31642874. PMCID: PMC7369156.
Article
8. Cantey EP, Wilkins JT. 2018; Discordance between lipoprotein particle number and cholesterol content: an update. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 25:130–6. DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000389. PMID: 29324459.
9. Mora S. Advanced lipoprotein testing and subfractionation are not (yet) ready for routine clinical use. Circulation. 2009; 119:2396–404. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.819359. PMID: 19414657. PMCID: PMC2735461.
Article
10. Sniderman AD, Williams K, Contois JH, Monroe HM, McQueen MJ, de Graaf J, et al. 2011; A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 4:337–45. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959247. PMID: 21487090.
Article
11. Johannesen CDL, Mortensen MB, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. 2021; Apolipoprotein B and non-HDL cholesterol better reflect residual risk than LDL cholesterol in statin-treated patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 77:1439–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.027. PMID: 33736827.
12. Thanassoulis G, Williams K, Ye K, Brook R, Couture P, Lawler PR, et al. 2014; Relations of change in plasma levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB with risk reduction from statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 3:e000759. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000759. PMID: 24732920. PMCID: PMC4187506.
Article
13. Kim Y, Han BG. KoGES Group. 2017; Cohort profile: the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 46:e20. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv316. PMID: 27085081. PMCID: PMC5837648.
Article
14. Nance R, Delaney J, McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Burke GL, Navas-Acien A, et al. 2017; Smoking intensity (pack/day) is a better measure than pack-years or smoking status for modeling cardiovascular disease outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 81:111–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.010. PMID: 27769836. PMCID: PMC5318261.
Article
15. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P, Kaptoge S, Ray KK, et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 2009; 302:1993–2000. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1619. PMID: 19903920. PMCID: PMC3284229.
Article
16. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Pennells L, Kaptoge S, Caslake M, et al. Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction. JAMA. 2012; 307:2499–506.
Article
17. Marston NA, Giugliano RP, Melloni GEM, Park JG, Morrill V, Blazing MA, et al. 2022; Association of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and risk of myocardial infarction in individuals with and without atherosclerosis: distinguishing between particle concentration, type, and content. JAMA Cardiol. 7:250–6. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5083. PMID: 34773460. PMCID: PMC8590731.
Article
18. Langlois MR, Chapman MJ, Cobbaert C, Mora S, Remaley AT, Ros E, et al. 2018; Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins: current and future challenges in the era of personalized medicine and very low concentrations of LDL cholesterol. A consensus statement from EAS and EFLM. Clin Chem. 64:1006–33. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.287037. PMID: 29760220.
Article
19. Hong J, Gu H, Lee J, Lee W, Chun S, Han KH, et al. 2023; Intuitive modification of the Friedewald formula for calculation of LDL-cholesterol. Ann Lab Med. 43:29–37. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.29. PMID: 36045054.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr