Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2023 Aug;27(3):292-300. 10.14701/ahbps.22-101.

Impact of conversion at time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative and long-term outcomes: Review of the National Cancer Database

Affiliations
  • 1Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, United States
  • 2Office of Human Research, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, United States
  • 3Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
  • 4Division of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, FL, United States

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Current literature presents limited data regarding outcomes following conversion at the time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD).
Methods
The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients were stratified into three groups: MI-PD, converted to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (CO-PD), and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PD). Multivariable modeling was applied to compare outcomes of MI-PD and CO-PD to those of O-PD.
Results
Of 17,570 patients identified, 12.5%, 4.2%, and 83.4% underwent MI-PD, CO-PD, and O-PD, respectively. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (R-PD) resulted in a higher lymph node yield (n = 23.2 ± 12.2) even when requiring conversion (n = 22.4 ± 13.2, p < 0.001). Margin positivity was higher in the CO-PD group (26.6%) than in the MI-PD group (21.3%) and the O-PD (22.6%) group (p = 0.017). Length of stay was shorter in the MI-PD group (laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 10.4 ± 8.6, R-PD 10.6 ± 8.8) and the robotic converted to open group (10.7 ± 6.4) than in the laparoscopic converted to open group (11.2 ± 9) and the O-PD group (11.5 ± 8.9) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, both MI-PD (odds ratio = 1.40; p < 0.001) and CO-PD (odds ratio = 1.24; p = 0.020) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of long-term survival.
Conclusions
CO-PD does not negatively impact perioperative or oncologic outcomes.

Keyword

Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic cancer; National Cancer Database

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Overall Survival by pancreaticoduodenectomy surgical approach. KM, Kaplan-Meier.

  • Fig. 2 Overall survival by case volume per year quartiles. KM, Kaplan-Meier.


Reference

1. Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz JJ, van Spreeuwel J. 1996; Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 223:280–285. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00008. PMID: 8604908. PMCID: PMC1235116.
2. Wright GP, Zureikat AH. 2016; Development of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an evidence-based systematic review of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 20:1658–1665. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1. PMID: 27412319.
3. Liang S, Hameed U, Jayaraman S. 2014; Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 20:14246–14254. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14246. PMID: 25339811. PMCID: PMC4202353.
4. Cuschieri SA, Jakimowicz JJ. 1998; Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Semin Laparosc Surg. 5:168–179. DOI: 10.1177/155335069800500303. PMID: 9787203.
5. Tan-Tam C, Chung SW. 2014; Minireview on laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 6:60–67. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i3.60. PMID: 24634709. PMCID: PMC3952161.
6. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. 2015; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 29:9–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z. PMID: 25125092.
7. Caba Molina D, Lambreton F, Arrangoiz Majul R. 2019; Trends in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29:147–151. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0421. PMID: 30222522.
8. Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ. 2011; Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg. 15:1151–1157. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1530-x. PMID: 21538192.
9. Gumbs AA, Rodriguez Rivera AM, Milone L, Hoffman JP. 2011; Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:1335–1341. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1503-4. PMID: 21207166.
10. Kausch W. 1912; [Das Carcinom der Papilla duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung]. Beitr Z Klin Chir. 78:439–486. German.
11. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. 1935; Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 102:763–779. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-193510000-00023. PMID: 17856666. PMCID: PMC1391173.
12. Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. 2015; Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 262:372–377. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055. PMID: 26158612.
13. Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Pisarska M, Major P, Wysocki M, Stefura T, et al. 2017; Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 402:841–851. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1583-8. PMID: 28488004. PMCID: PMC5506213.
14. Nassour I, Winters SB, Hoehn R, Tohme S, Adam MA, Bartlett DL, et al. 2020; Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 122:234–242. DOI: 10.1002/jso.25958. PMID: 32350882.
15. Zhang J, Wu WM, You L, Zhao YP. 2013; Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 20:1774–1780. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2823-3. PMID: 23504140.
16. Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Augustine MM, Yopp AC, Mansour JC, et al. 2017; Conversion of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: predictors and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 24:3725–3731. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6062-5. PMID: 28849407.
17. Yerokun BA, Adam MA, Sun Z, Kim J, Sprinkle S, Migaly J, et al. 2016; Does conversion in laparoscopic colectomy portend an inferior oncologic outcome? Results from 104,400 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 20:1042–1048. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3073-7. PMID: 26768006. PMCID: PMC5142516.
18. Nassour I, Paniccia A, Moser AJ, Zureikat AH. 2021; Minimally invasive techniques for pancreatic resection. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 30:747–758. DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.007. PMID: 34511194.
19. Van Hilst J, de Graaf N, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. 2021; The landmark series: minimally invasive pancreatic resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 28:1447–1456. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09335-3. PMID: 33341916. PMCID: PMC7892688.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr