Saf Health Work.  2023 Jun;14(2):141-152. 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.02.003.

Firefighting and Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies in the Context of Cancer Hazard Identification

Affiliations
  • 1Evidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
  • 2National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, USA
  • 3Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA
  • 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, USA
  • 5Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 6American Cancer Society, Atlanta, USA
  • 7Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 8Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
  • 9Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Ontario Health, Toronto, Canada
  • 10School of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • 11Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, USA
  • 12University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Abstract


Objective
We performed a meta-analysis of epidemiological results for the association between occupational exposure as a firefighter and cancer as part of the broader evidence synthesis work of the IARC Monographs program.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify cohort studies of firefighters followed for cancer incidence and mortality. Studies were evaluated for the influence of key biases on results. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to estimate the association between ever-employment and duration of employment as a firefighter and risk of 12 selected cancers. The impact of bias was explored in sensitivity analyses.
Results
Among the 16 included cancer incidence studies, the estimated meta-rate ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI), and heterogeneity statistic (I2) for ever-employment as a career firefighter compared mostly to general populations were 1.58 (1.14–2.20, 8%) for mesothelioma, 1.16 (1.08–1.26, 0%) for bladder cancer, 1.21 (1.12–1.32, 81%) for prostate cancer, 1.37 (1.03–1.82, 56%) for testicular cancer, 1.19 (1.07–1.32, 37%) for colon cancer, 1.36 (1.15–1.62, 83%) for melanoma, 1.12 (1.01–1.25, 0%) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 1.28 (1.02–1.61, 40%) for thyroid cancer, and 1.09 (0.92–1.29, 55%) for kidney cancer. Ever-employment as a firefighter was not positively associated with lung, nervous system, or stomach cancer. Results for mesothelioma and bladder cancer exhibited low heterogeneity and were largely robust across sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions
There is epidemiological evidence to support a causal relationship between occupational exposure as a firefighter and certain cancers. Challenges persist in the body of evidence related to the quality of exposure assessment, confounding, and medical surveillance bias.

Keyword

Cancer; Firefighter; Hazard
Full Text Links
  • SHAW
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr