Clin Endosc.  2023 May;56(3):263-267. 10.5946/ce.2023.003.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy’s carbon footprint

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Climate change is a global emergency. Consequently, current global targets to combat the climate crisis include reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and keeping global temperature increases below 1.5 ˚C. In 2014, the healthcare carbon footprint was 5.5% of the total national footprint. Gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) has a large carbon footprint compared to other procedures performed in healthcare facilities. GIE was identified as the third largest generator of medical waste in healthcare facilities for the following reasons: (1) GIE is associated with high case volumes, (2) GIE patients and relatives travel frequently, (3) GIE involves the use of many nonrenewable wastes, (4) single-use devices are used during GIE, and (5) GIE is frequently reprocessed. Immediate actions to reduce the environmental impact of GIE include: (1) adhering to guidelines, (2) implementing audit strategies to determine the appropriateness of GIE, (3) avoiding unnecessary procedures, (4) using medication rationally, (4) digitalization, (5) telemedicine, (6) critical pathways, (7) outpatient procedures, (8) adequate waste management, and (9) minimizing single-use devices. In addition, sustainable infrastructure for endoscopy units, using renewable energy, and 3R (reduce, reuse, and recycle) programs are necessary to reduce the impact of GIE on the climate crisis. Consequently, healthcare providers need to work together to achieve a more sustainable future. Therefore, strategies must be implemented to achieve net-zero carbon emissions in the healthcare field, especially from GIE, by 2050.

Keyword

Carbon emission; Carbon footprint; Environment; Green endoscopy; Net-zero

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Climate change affecting every corner of the planet. Modified from NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information.1


Reference

1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NOAA NCEI). Monthly Global Climate Report for September 2022 [Internet]. NOAA NCEI;2022. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202209.
2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Global climate change: vital signs of the planet [Internet]. NASA;2020. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://climate.nasa.gov.
3. World Economic Forum. The global risks report 2022 [Internet]. World Economic Forum;2022. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf.
4. Siau K, Hayee BH, Gayam S. Endoscopy’s current carbon footprint. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 23:344–352.
5. Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health. 2020; 4:e271–e279.
6. Pichler PP, Jaccard IS, Weisz U, et al. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett. 2019; 14:064004.
7. Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, et al. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. Lancet. 2019; 394:1836–1878.
8. Salas RN, Maibach E, Pencheon D, et al. A pathway to net zero emissions for healthcare. BMJ. 2020; 371:m3785.
9. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health. 2021; 5:e84–e92.
10. Keller RL, Muir K, Roth F, et al. From bandages to buildings: identifying the environmental hotspots of hospitals. J Clean Prod. 2021; 319:128479.
11. Baddeley R, Aabakken L, Veitch A, et al. Green endoscopy: counting the carbon cost of our practice. Gastroenterology. 2022; 162:1556–1560.
12. Leddin D, Omary MB, Veitch A, et al. Uniting the global gastroenterology community to meet the challenge of climate change and non-recyclable waste. Gut. 2021; 70:2025–2029.
13. Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J, et al. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut. 2022; 71:1326–1331.
14. Gayam S. Environmental impact of endoscopy: “scope” of the problem. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020; 115:1931–1932.
15. Rodríguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, et al. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2022; 54:797–826.
16. Hernandez LV, Le NN, Patnode C, et al. Comparing the impact of reusable and single-use duodenoscopes using life cycle assessment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93(6 Suppl):AB29.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr