J Rheum Dis.  2022 Oct;29(4):223-231. 10.4078/jrd.22.0006.

Predictive Factors for Renal Response in Lupus Nephritis: A Single-center Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Korea
  • 2Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To identify the predictive factors for renal response in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).
Methods
Patients and data were extracted from a prospective systemic lupus erythematosus cohort in Korea, in which clinical data were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after induction therapy. Treatment response of LN were evaluated as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or non-response (NR) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Predictive factors for CR at 6 months were evaluated using multivariable Poisson regression analysis.
Results
A total of 75 patients with LN who underwent biopsy was enrolled. The mean age at diagnosis of LN was 28.9±9.7 years, and 68 (90.7%) were female. The frequencies of classes III, IV, III+V, IV+V, and V were 20.0%, 44.0%, 16.0%, 12.0%, and 8.0%, respectively. Compared to relapsed LN, new-onset LN showed a lower percentage of glomerulosclerosis (45.5% vs. 76.2%, p=0.013). The overall proportions of CR, PR, and NR at 6 and 12 months were 52.0%, 26.7%, 21.3% and 50.7%, 24.0%, 25.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age at enrollment (odds ratio [OR]=1.02, p=0.022), relapsed LN (OR=0.71, p=0.037), anti-Ro antibody (OR=0.67, p=0.014), and class III LN (OR=1.48, p=0.001) were associated with CR at 6 months.
Conclusion
In our prospective cohort, class III LN was a good predictive factor for CR at 6 months in patients with LN, whereas younger age, relapsed LN, and anti-Ro antibody were poor predictive factors.

Keyword

Systemic lupus erythematosus; Lupus nephritis; Outcome assessment; Risk factor

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of renal response rates at 3, 6, and 12 months after induction treatment (A). Comparison of renal response rates by lupus nephritis class at 3, 6, and 12 months (B).


Reference

1. Hanly JG, O'Keeffe AG, Su L, Urowitz MB, Romero-Diaz J, Gordon C, et al. 2016; The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 55:252–62. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev311. PMID: 26342222. PMCID: PMC4939728.
2. Bastian HM, Roseman JM, McGwin G Jr, Alarcón GS, Friedman AW, Fessler BJ, et al. 2002; Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. XII. Risk factors for lupus nephritis after diagnosis. Lupus. 11:152–60. DOI: 10.1191/0961203302lu158oa. PMID: 12004788.
Article
3. Kalloo S, Aggarwal N, Mohan P, Radhakrishnan J. 2013; Lupus nephritis: treatment of resistant disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 8:154–61. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05870612. PMID: 23296380.
Article
4. Ichinose K, Kitamura M, Sato S, Eguchi M, Okamoto M, Endo Y, et al. 2019; Complete renal response at 12 months after induction therapy is associated with renal relapse-free rate in lupus nephritis: a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Lupus. 28:501–9. DOI: 10.1177/0961203319829827. PMID: 30755146.
Article
5. Vajgel G, Oliveira CBL, Costa DMN, Cavalcante MAGM, Valente LM, Sesso R, et al. 2020; Initial renal histology and early response predict outcomes of Brazilian lupus nephritis patients. Lupus. 29:83–91. DOI: 10.1177/0961203319890681. PMID: 31801041.
Article
6. Davidson JE, Fu Q, Ji B, Rao S, Roth D, Magder LS, et al. 2018; Renal remission status and longterm renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Rheumatol. 45:671–7. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161554. PMID: 29496892. PMCID: PMC5932209.
Article
7. Luís MSF, Bultink IEM, da Silva JAP, Voskuyl AE, Inês LS. 2021; Early predictors of renal outcome in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a 36-month cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 60:5134–41. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab126. PMID: 33560332.
Article
8. Park DJ, Choi SE, Xu H, Kang JH, Lee KE, Lee JS, et al. 2018; Chronicity index, especially glomerular sclerosis, is the most powerful predictor of renal response following immunosuppressive treatment in patients with lupus nephritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 21:458–67. DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13254. PMID: 29314776.
Article
9. Okamoto M, Kitamura M, Sato S, Fujikawa K, Horai Y, Matsuoka N, et al. 2021; Life prognosis and renal relapse after induction therapy in Japanese patients with proliferative and pure membranous lupus nephritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 60:2333–41. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa599. PMID: 33166998.
Article
10. Liu G, Wang H, Le J, Lan L, Xu Y, Yang Y, et al. 2019; Early-stage predictors for treatment responses in patients with active lupus nephritis. Lupus. 28:283–9. DOI: 10.1177/0961203319826703. PMID: 30682900.
Article
11. Hochberg MC. 1997; Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 40:1725. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780400928. PMID: 9324032.
Article
12. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. 2012; Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 64:2677–86. DOI: 10.1002/art.34473. PMID: 22553077. PMCID: PMC3409311.
13. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. 2002; Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 29:288–91.
14. Bajema IM, Wilhelmus S, Alpers CE, Bruijn JA, Colvin RB, Cook HT, et al. 2018; Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices. Kidney Int. 93:789–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.11.023. PMID: 29459092.
Article
15. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, Anders HJ, Aringer M, Bajema I, et al. 2020; 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 79:713–23. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924. PMID: 32220834.
16. Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, Wallace WD, Daikh DI, Fitzgerald JD, et al. 2012; American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 64:797–808. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21664. PMID: 22556106. PMCID: PMC3437757.
Article
17. Renal Disease Subcommittee of the American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Response Criteria. 2006; The American College of Rheumatology response criteria for proliferative and membranous renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 54:421–32. DOI: 10.1002/art.21625. PMID: 16453282.
18. Cattran DC, Feehally J, Cook HT, Liu ZH, Fervenza FC, Mezzano SA, et al. 2012; Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) glomerulonephritis work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2:139–274.
19. Choi SE, Park DJ, Kang JH, Lee KE, Xu H, Lee JS, et al. 2019; Comparison of renal responses to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil used as induction therapies in Korean patients with lupus nephritis. J Rheum Dis. 26:57–65. DOI: 10.4078/jrd.2019.26.1.57.
Article
20. Korbet SM, Lewis EJ. 2012; Complete remission in severe lupus nephritis: assessing the rate of loss in proteinuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 27:2813–9. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr741. PMID: 22199359.
Article
21. Mok CC, To CH, Yu KL, Ho LY. 2013; Combined low-dose mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for lupus nephritis with suboptimal response to standard therapy: a 12-month prospective study. Lupus. 22:1135–41. DOI: 10.1177/0961203313502864. PMID: 23995863.
Article
22. Marinaki S, Kapsia E, Liapis G, Gakiopoulou H, Skalioti C, Kolovou K, et al. 2020; Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease. Eur J Rheumatol. 7:2–8. DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18146. PMID: 31782721. PMCID: PMC7001996.
Article
23. Korbet SM, Lewis EJ, Schwartz MM, Reichlin M, Evans J, Rohde RD. 2000; Factors predictive of outcome in severe lupus nephritis. Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 35:904–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70262-9.
24. Moon SJ, Park HS, Kwok SK, Ju JH, Choi BS, Park KS, et al. 2013; Predictors of renal relapse in Korean patients with lupus nephritis who achieved remission six months following induction therapy. Lupus. 22:527–37. DOI: 10.1177/0961203313476357. PMID: 23423249.
Article
25. Sule SD, Moodalbail DG, Burnham J, Fivush B, Furth SL. 2015; Predictors of kidney disease in a cohort of pediatric patients with lupus. Lupus. 24:862–8. DOI: 10.1177/0961203315570162. PMID: 25680740. PMCID: PMC4466076.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr