Ultrasonography.  2022 Jan;41(1):212-221. 10.14366/usg.21095.

Comparison of two different lung ultrasound imaging protocols in COVID-19 pneumonia

• Ökmen K
• Yildiz DK
• Soyaslan E
• Ceylan &
• Sayan HE
• Aytünür CS

• KMID: 2523434
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21095

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two different lung ultrasonography (LUS) methods that can be used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to investigate their correlations with computed tomography (CT).
Methods
In this prospective, randomized, and single-blind study, 60 patients with COVID-19 were included. The patients were randomized to either the 12-zone LUS group (n=30) or the 14-zone LUS group (n=30). The correlation between LUS and thoracic CT scores was evaluated. As a secondary outcome measure, the characteristic features of the findings of thoracic CT and LUS were examined.
Results
The study was completed with a total of 59 patients. Moderate and high correlations were found between the total CT and LUS scores in the 12-zone and 14-zone study groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the lesion types detected in patients using LUS and CT (P>0.05). The left lung lower lobe CT scores were statistically significantly lower in the 14-zone study group than in the 12-zone group (P=0.019). The left lower lobe CT and LUS scores were highly correlated in the 14-zone group (P<0.001, r=0.902).
Conclusion
The results of our study indicated that the two different LUS examination methods performed in different patients had similar findings in terms of the diagnosis and their correlations with CT results.

Keyword

COVID-19; Lung ultrasound; Computed tomography; Pneumonia