Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2020 Jul;63(4):514-520. 10.5468/ogs.19170.

Intravaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
  • 3Endometriosis Research Center,Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract


Objective
The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of vaginal isoniazid (isonicotinic acid hydrazide [INH]) and vaginal misoprostol in cervical ripening before hysteroscopic surgery.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery during April 2016 and June 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: postmenopausal women or those at premenopausal age who had not had a vaginal delivery and candidate for diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy with closed cervix before intervention. The INH group (intervention group) received 900 mg of vaginal isoniazid (three 300-mg pills) 6–8 hours before hysteroscopic surgery. The misoprostol group (control group) received 400 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol 6–8 hours before hysteroscopic surgery. Finally, the efficacy of the 2 agents was comparatively analyzed.
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. In 67 cases in the INH group (95%) and 45 in the misoprostol group (50%), hysteroscopic entry was successful without additional mechanical dilation, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). The odds ratio (OR) obtained in this study was 0.57 for both INH and misoprostol groups (OR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.75). Further, 19 cases in the INH group vs. 45 cases in the misoprostol group did not respond to the intervention, indicating statistically significance (P=0.001).
Conclusion
Vaginal INH is more effective than misoprostol in cervical ripening before hysteroscopic surgery and can be a good alternative to misoprostol. Trial Registration Iranian Registry Clinical Trial (IRCT) Identifier: IRCT2015112821506N4

Keyword

Isonicotinic acid hydrazide; Misoprostol; Cervical ripening
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr