Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2018 Nov;22(6):637-647. 10.4196/kjpp.2018.22.6.637.

The treatment effect of novel hGHRH homodimer to male infertility hamster

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Courses, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China. songstang@hotmail.com
  • 2Clinical Laboratories, Guangdong Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510507, China.
  • 3Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706, USA.
  • 4Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510507, China.
  • 5Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Bioactive Substances, School of Basic Courses, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
  • 6Department of Endocrinology, Wuwei City Hospital, Wuwei 733000, China.

Abstract

Extra-hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) plays an important role in reproduction. To study the treatment effect of Grin (a novel hGHRH homodimer), the infertility models of 85 male Chinese hamsters were established by intraperitoneally injecting 20 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide once in a week for 5 weeks and the treatment with Grin or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) as positive control was evaluated by performing a 3-week mating experiment. 2-8 mg/kg of Grin and 200 U/kg of hMG showed similar effect and different pathological characteristics. Compared to the single cyclophosphamide group (0%), the pregnancy rates (H-, M-, L-Grin 26.7, 30.8, 31.3%, and hMG 31.3%) showed significant difference, but there was no difference between the hMG and Grin groups. The single cyclophosphamide group presented loose tubules with pathologic vacuoles and significant TUNEL positive cells. Grin induced less weight of body or testis, compactly aligned tubules with little intra-lumens, whereas hMG caused more weight of body or testis, enlarging tubules with annular clearance. Grin presented a dose-dependent manner or cell differentiation-dependentincrease in testicular GHRH receptor, and did not impact the levels of blood and testicular GH, testosterone. Grin promotes fertility by proliferating and differentiating primitive cells through up-regulating testicular GHRH receptor without triggering GH secretion, which might solve the etiology of oligoasthenozoospermia.

Keyword

Autocrine; Chines hamster; Growth hormone releasing hormone; Homodimer; Male infertility

MeSH Terms

Animals
Cricetinae*
Cricetulus
Cyclophosphamide
Fertility
Gonadotropins
Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone
Humans
In Situ Nick-End Labeling
Infertility
Infertility, Male*
Male
Male*
Pregnancy Rate
Reproduction
Testis
Testosterone
Vacuoles
Cyclophosphamide
Gonadotropins
Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone
Testosterone

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Experimental design schema. The single CPA group was administered CPA i.p. once in a week in the former 5 weeks and saline i.m. twice in a week in the latter 5 weeks. The hMG or Grin groups were administered CPA i.p. once in a week in the former 5 weeks and added hMG or Grin i.m. twice in a week from the fourth week to the tenth one. All the animals were sacrificed after the tenth week.

  • Fig. 2 Changes of body weights or organ weights of the hamster models. (A) Body weight analysis, *p<0.05 vs. single CPA group, T test; (B) Organ weight analysis, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, a vs. single CPA, b vs. hMG group, T test.

  • Fig. 3 H-E staining of the testicular tissues [(Mag.4×10 times, bar 100 µm, eosin (pink cytoplasm) and hematoxylin (blue nucleus)]. “十” refers to the intralumen in seminiferous tubule. CPA: cyclophosphamide group, “→” points at pathological vacuole; hMG: human menopausal gonadotropin group, “→” points at the annular clearance, “>” points at the broken wall of seminiferous tubule; H-Grin: high Grin dose; M-Grin: middle Grin dose. L-Grin: low Grin dose.

  • Fig. 4 Effect of CPA-induced DNA damage in testicular cells. (A) TUNEL staining (Mag.20×10 times, bar 20 µm, yellow-green TUNEL positive cells). “十” refers to the intra-lumen, “→” points at spermatogonium, “>” points at spermatocyte, “>>” points at spermoblast, “†” points at sperm nuclei, and “‡” refers to sperm body and tail; (B) Quantitative estimation of TUNEL-positive cells. p<0.05* or 0.01**, 0.001*** vs. the single CPA (a) or hMG (b) group.

  • Fig. 5 Fluorescent staining of FITC-hGHRH(1-44)NH2 peptide in the testis tissues. (A) Picture merged (Mag.20×10 times, bar 20 µm, GHRH receptor (yellow green) and DAPI (blue nucleus). Symbols are the same as those in Fig. 4; (B) Quantitative estimation of fluorescent staining positive cells of FITC-hGHRH(1-44)NH2 peptide. p<0.05* or 0.01** vs. the single CPA (a) or hMG (b) group.

  • Fig. 6 Immunofluorescent staining of GHRH receptor protein in testicular tissues. (A) Picture merged [Mag.20×10 times, bar 20 µm, FITC (yellow GHRH receptor) and DAPI (blue nucleus)]. Symbols are the same as those in Fig. 4; (B) Quantitative estimation of positive cells of GHRH receptor immunofluorescent staining. p<0.05* or 0.01** vs. the single CPA (a), or hMG (b) group.

  • Fig. 7 Immunofluorescent staining of GH protein in testicular tissues. (A) Picture merged [Mag.40×10 times, bar 10 µm, Cy3 (red GH) and DAPI (blue nucleus)]. Symbols are the same as those in Fig. 4; (B) Quantitative estimation of positive cells of GH immunofluorescent staining. *p<0.05 or **p<0.01 vs. the single CPA (a) or hMG (b) group.

  • Fig. 8 Western blotting analysis of testicular GHRH receptor or GH protein. (A) GHRH receptor (47 kDa) and β-Actin (42 kDa) protein were marked. *p<0.05 or **p<0.01 vs. the single CPA group. (B) GH (24 kDa) and β-Actin (42 kDa) protein were marked.


Reference

1. Irvine DS. Epidemiology and aetiology of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13:Suppl 1. 33–44.
Article
2. Jung JH, Seo JT. Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: promise or panacea? Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2014; 41:108–114.
Article
3. Ko EY, Siddiqi K, Brannigan RE, Sabanegh ES Jr. Empirical medical therapy for idiopathic male infertility: a survey of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 2012; 187:973–978.
Article
4. Showell MG, Brown J, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Hart RJ. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (1):CD007411.
Article
5. Hull KL, Harvey S. Growth hormone: a reproductive endocrine-paracrine regulator? Rev Reprod. 2000; 5:175–182.
Article
6. Chubb C. Sexual behavior and fertility of little mice. Biol Reprod. 1987; 37:564–569.
7. Bartke A, Chandrashekar V, Turyn D, Steger RW, Debeljuk L, Winters TA, Mattison JA, Danilovich NA, Croson W, Wernsing DR, Kopchick JJ. Effects of growth hormone overexpression and growth hormone resistance on neuroendocrine and reproductive functions in transgenic and knock-out mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1999; 222:113–123.
8. Bartke A, Naar EM, Johnson L, May MR, Cecim M, Yun JS, Wagner TE. Effects of expression of human or bovine growth hormone genes on sperm production and male reproductive performance in four lines of transgenic mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1992; 95:109–118.
Article
9. Champion ZJ, Vickers MH, Gravance CG, Breier BH, Casey PJ. Growth hormone or insulin-like growth factor-I extends longevity of equine spermatozoa in vitro. Theriogenology. 2002; 57:1793–1800.
Article
10. Debeljuk L, Steger RW, Wright JC, Mattison J, Bartke A. Effects of overexpression of growth hormone-releasing hormone on the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal function in the mouse. Endocrine. 1999; 11:171–179.
Article
11. Berry SA, Srivastava CH, Rubin LR, Phipps WR, Pescovitz OH. Growth hormone-releasing hormone-like messenger ribonucleic acid and immunoreactive peptide are present in human testis and placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992; 75:281–284.
Article
12. Martínez-Moreno CG, López-Marín LM, Carranza M, Giterman D, Harvey S, Arámburo C, Luna M. Growth hormone (GH) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH): Co-localization and action in the chicken testis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014; 199:38–45.
Article
13. Luna M, Martínez-Moreno CG, Ahumada-Solórzano MS, Harvey S, Carranza M, Arámburo C. Extrapituitary growth hormone in the chicken reproductive system. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014; 203:60–68.
Article
14. Zhou D, You J, Li QY, Li HZ, Wu WF, Zhang XD, Zhang JH, Tang SS, Wang YK, Liu T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel structure-related hGHRH agonistic analogs. Growth Factors. 2015; 33:160–168.
Article
15. Tripathi DN, Jena GB. Astaxanthin inhibits cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cyclophosphamide in mice germ cells. Toxicology. 2008; 248:96–103.
Article
16. Tang SS, Zhang JH, Liu HX, Li HZ. PC2/CPE-mediated pro-protein processing in tumor cells and its differentiated cells or tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009; 303:43–49.
Article
17. Lee LT, Siu FK, Tam JK, Lau IT, Wong AO, Lin MC, Vaudry H, Chow BK. Discovery of growth hormone-releasing hormones and receptors in nonmammalian vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:2133–2138.
Article
18. Jain S, Desai N, Bhangoo A. Pathophysiology of GHRH-growth hormone-IGF1 axis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013; 14:113–118.
19. Spiliotis BE. Growth hormone insufficiency and its impact on ovarian function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003; 997:77–84.
Article
20. Bartke A, Cecim M, Tang K, Steger RW, Chandrashekar V, Turyn D. Neuroendocrine and reproductive consequences of overexpression of growth hormone in transgenic mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1994; 206:345–359.
Article
21. Magon N, Singh S, Saxena A, Sahay R. Growth hormone in male infertility. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 15:Suppl 3. S248–S249.
Article
22. Giagulli VA. Absence of effect of recombinant growth hormone to classic gonadotropin treatment on spermatogenesis of patients with severe hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Arch Androl. 1999; 43:47–53.
Article
23. Chen T, Cheng HJ. Clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant human-growth hormone in the treatment of idiopathic asthenospermia. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2007; 13:233–236.
24. Childs GV. Development of gonadotropes may involve cyclic transdifferentiation of growth hormone cells. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2002; 110:42–49.
Article
25. Mayo KE, Miller T, DeAlmeida V, Godfrey P, Zheng J, Cunha SR. Regulation of the pituitary somatotroph cell by GHRH and its receptor. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2000; 55:237–266.
26. Chen C, Vincent JD, Clarke IJ. Ion channels and the signal transduction pathways in the regulation of growth hormone secretion. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1994; 5:227–233.
Article
27. Miller TL, Godfrey PA, Dealmeida VI, Mayo KE. The rat growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor gene: structure, regulation and generation of receptor isoforms with different signaling properties. Endocrinology. 1999; 140:4152–4165.
28. Ramírez JL, Castaño JP, Torronteras R, Martínez-Fuentes AJ, Frawley LS, García-Navarro S, Gracia-Navarro F. Growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor differentially activates cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate- and inositol phosphate-dependent pathways to stimulate GH release in two porcine somatotrope subpopulations. Endocrinology. 1999; 140:1752–1759.
29. Pombo CM, Zalvide J, Gaylinn BD, Diéguez C. Growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase. Endocrinology. 2000; 141:2113–2119.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr