Ann Rehabil Med.  2018 Oct;42(5):758-766. 10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.758.

Evaluating Korean Personal Assistance Services Classification System

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. mjlee1@ufl.edu
  • 2Center of Innovation on Disability & Rehabilitation Research (CINDRR), North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • 3Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
  • 4Department of Occupational Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the utility of using the Personal Assistance Services classification system (PAS-CS) that examines individuals with disabilities for services and government funding. To this end, this study also tests for significant differences in PAS-CS scores across disability grades and disability types.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted using the 2014 National Survey on People with Disabilities (NSPD) data set. We selected patients with three types of disabilities (physical disabilities, brain lesions, and visual impairments). We compared the average PAS-CS scores of patients with different disability types and grades using general linear models with multiple comparisons.
RESULTS
A total of 4,810 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with brain lesions had the highest average PAS-CS scores in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) domains. Patients with visual impairments had the highest average scores in "˜Disease-specific disability' and "˜Social-environment' domains. For patients with physical disabilities and visual impairments, no PAS-CS domains were significantly different between patients with disability grade III and those with disability grade IV (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The PAS-CS scores of disability grades were not equivalent among individuals with different disability types. The Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare currently only considers certain disability grades for PAS preeligibility, as a result disregarding the characteristics of different disability types. Thus, the current PAS-CS requires modifications.

Keyword

Disability evaluation; Public assistance; Social welfare; Republic of Korea

MeSH Terms

Activities of Daily Living
Brain
Classification*
Dataset
Disability Evaluation
Disabled Persons
Financial Management
Humans
Linear Models
Public Assistance
Republic of Korea
Retrospective Studies
Social Welfare
Vision Disorders

Reference

1. Beatty PW, Richmond GW, Tepper S, DeJong G. Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: consumer-direction and satisfaction with services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79:674–7.
Article
2. Misra S, Orslene LE, Walls RT. Personal Assistance Services (PAS) for workers with disabilities: Views and experiences of rehabilitation service providers. Disabil Stud Q. 2007; 27:31.
Article
3. DeJong G, Wenker T. Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979; 60:477–82.
4. Byun KH, Kim DK, Lee MJ, Won JP, Park HG, Lee W, et al. Modification of personal assistance service classification system. Osan: Hanshin University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation;2012.
5. LaPlante MP, Kaye HS, Kang T, Harrington C. Unmet need for personal assistance services: estimating the shortfall in hours of help and adverse consequences. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 59:S98–S108.
Article
6. Allen SM, Mor V. The prevalence and consequences of unmet need: contrasts between older and younger adults with disability. Med Care. 1997; 35:1132–48.
7. Desai MM, Lentzner HR, Weeks JD. Unmet need for personal assistance with activities of daily living among older adults. Gerontologist. 2001; 41:82–8.
Article
8. Lima JC, Allen SM. Targeting risk for unmet need: not enough help versus no help at all. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001; 56:S302–10.
Article
9. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2017 Personal Assistance Services (Volume V). Sejong: Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare;2017.
10. Kim SH, Byun YC, Lee SH, Cho HS, Kim CW, Lee SK, et al. Political research for implementing of personal assistance services. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Affairs;2011.
11. Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled. 2016 Statistics for people with disabilities. Seongnam: Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled;2016.
12. Kim SH, Lee YH, Hwang JH, Oh MA, Lee MK, Lee NH, et al. 2014 National Survey on People with Disabilities. Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs;;2014.
13. The R Foundation. The R project for statistical computing (R 3.4.1) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;c2017. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
14. Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more Version 0.4-9 (BETA) [Internet]. Ghent: Ghent University;2011. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: http://byrneslab.net/classes/lavaan_materials/lavaanIntroduction4-9.pdf.
15. Barton K. MuMIn: multi-model inference (Release 1.9.13) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2013. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html.
16. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Heiberger RM, Schuetzenmeister A, Scheibe S. multcomp: simultaneous inference in general parametric models (Release 1.4-2) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2016. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multcomp/index.html.
17. Komsta L, Novomestky F. moments: moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests (Release 0.14) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2015. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/moments/index.html.
18. Pena EA, Slate EH. gvlma: global validation of linear models assumptions (Release 0.0.0.2) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2014. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gvlma/index.html.
19. Ripley B, Venables B, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D. MASS: support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley’s MASS (Release 7.3.-48) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2017. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/index.html.
20. Kleiber C, Zeileis A. AER: applied econometrics with R (Release 1.1.1) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2009. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AER/index.html.
21. Wickham H, Francois R. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation (Release 0.4.3) [Internet]. [place unknown]: The R Foundation;2015. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/index.html.
22. Seoul Information Communication Plaza. 2016 Personal assistance services [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government;2016. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: http://opengov.seoul.go.kr/public/8151883.
23. Seoul Information Communication Plaza. Definition and registration of the disabled [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government;2016. [cited 2018 Sep 15]. Available from: http://disability.seoul.go.kr/registration/registration.jsp?Depth=1311.
24. van der Ploeg HP, van der Beek AJ, van der Woude LH, van Mechelen W. Physical activity for people with a disability: a conceptual model. Sports Med. 2004; 34:639–49.
25. Stancil MA. Physical activity and quality of life experienced by participants of a wheelchair basketball tournament [dissertation]. Gainesville: University of Florida;2007.
26. Institute of Medicine. Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington: National Academies Press;1997.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr