J Nutr Health.  2018 Aug;51(4):357-367. 10.4163/jnh.2018.51.4.357.

Consumer knowledge regarding country-of-origin labeling for restaurants

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea. wshong@smu.ac.kr
  • 2Major in Food Science, College of Biomedical and Health Science, Konkuk University, Chungju, Chungbuk 27478, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Because of recent global and domestic issues regarding the safety of food, there is growing concern over food safety and interest in the country-of-origin for food ingredients from restaurants. This study was conducted to reveal the influence of consumer level of knowledge and awareness regarding restaurants and the country-of-origin labeling.
METHODS
To accomplish this, a primary survey of adults aged over 20 years old was conducted to measure customers' knowledge regarding country-of-origin labeling for restaurants. Respondents were then divided into a lower group and an upper group based on their level of knowledge to evaluate significant differences between groups. A total of 437 of 460 questionnaires were analyzed.
RESULTS
The average knowledge score regarding country-of-origin labeling for restaurants was 6.3 out of 10. Additionally, there were significant differences between the lower and upper group in terms of the final education level and occupation.
CONCLUSION
It is necessary to develop guidelines and public relations for country-of-origin labeling of restaurants.

Keyword

country-of-origin labeling; consumer; knowledge level; restaurant; food safety

MeSH Terms

Adult
Education
Food Safety
Humans
Occupations
Public Relations
Restaurants*
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Boholm Å. The cultural nature of risk: can there be an anthropology of uncertainty. Ethnos. 2003; 68(2):159–178.
Article
2. Zinn JO. Recent developments in sociology of risk and uncertainty. Hist Soz Forsch. 2006; 31(2):275–286.
3. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (KR). Country-of-origin labeling [Internet]. Gimcheon: National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service;2017. cited 2018 Jan 10. Available from: http://www.naqs.go.kr.
4. Park YM, Ko YS, Chai I. Perception and importance for country-of-origin labeling at restaurants in college students in Jeju. J Nutr Health. 2018; 51(2):177–185.
Article
5. Lee SM, Jin YH. Research on consumer awareness due to origin declaration of beef in general restaurant. Korean J Culinary Res. 2009; 15(3):112–127.
6. Nam JY, Hong WS. Study on importance-performance analysis regarding country-of-origin labeling for restaurants. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2015; 31(1):53–61.
Article
7. Kim SY, Park S, Joo N. Recognition of elementary school students for the country-of-origin labeling at school foodservice in Seoul. Korean J Community Nutr. 2010; 15(4):507–512.
8. Ahn HJ, Park SH, Joo NM. Consumer awareness and demand for country-of-origin labeling at restaurants: for adults who live in Seoul. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2010; 16(3):255–269.
9. Pouliot S, Sumner DA. Differential impacts of country of origin labeling: COOL econometric evidence from cattle markets. Food Policy. 2014; 49:107–116.
Article
10. Pouta E, Heikkilä J, Forsman-Hugg S, Isoniemi M, Mäkelä J. Consumer choice of broiler meat: the effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Qual Prefer. 2010; 21(5):539–546.
Article
11. Na TK, Choi IS. Communication effects of the presenting types of menu labels and consumers' knowledge level. Korean J Culinary Res. 2008; 14(1):107–122.
12. Brucks M. The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. J Consum Res. 1985; 12(1):1–16.
Article
13. Bettman JR, Park CW. Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J Consum Res. 1980; 7(3):234–248.
Article
14. Rao AR, Sieben WA. The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. J Consum Res. 1992; 19(2):256–270.
Article
15. Yoon Y, Kim K. A qualitative study on consumers' perceptions of food safety risk factors. J Korean Home Manage Assoc. 2013; 31(4):15–31.
Article
16. Kim HJ, Park JP, Kim MJ, Ryu KS. Does perceived restaurant food healthiness matter? Its influence on value, satisfaction and revisit intentions in restaurant operations in South Korea. Int J Hosp Manag. 2013; 33(6):397–405.
Article
17. Park SH. Consumer's menu choices by providing nutritional information and the moderating effect of future orientation. Korea J Tourism Hosp Res. 2011; 25(4):335–352.
18. Hwang JJ. How does nutritional information about fast food menu items influence consumer choice behavior according to their health consciousness and nutritional knowledge? Korean J Hosp Adm. 2012; 21(2):93–112.
19. Yoon JY, Ha AH, Ju S. Importance and performance of food and nutrition labeling for school adolescents in Seoul. J Nutr Health. 2017; 50(4):383–390.
Article
20. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statistics 2011: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-2). Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2011.
21. Kwon YS, Ju SY. Trends in nutrient intakes and consumption while eating-out among Korean adults based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1998-2012) data. Nutr Res Pract. 2014; 8(6):670–678.
Article
22. Nam JY, Hong WS. A study on the selection attributes regarding American beef by importance-performance analysis: focused on the university students in Seoul and Gyeonggi area. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2012; 28(1):33–40.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JNH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr