J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2015;12:44. 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.44.

Modifiable variables in physical therapy education programs associated with first-time and three-year National Physical Therapy Examination pass rates in the United States

• Cook C
• Engelhard
• Landry MD
• McCallum C

• KMID: 2402051
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.44

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to examine the modifiable programmatic characteristics reflected in the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) Annual Accreditation Report for all accredited programs that reported pass rates on the National Physical Therapist Examination, and to build a predictive model for first-time and three-year ultimate pass rates.
METHODS
This observational study analyzed programmatic information from the 185 CAPTE-accredited physical therapy programs in the United States and Puerto Rico out of a total of 193 programs that provided the first-time and three-year ultimate pass rates in 2011. Fourteen predictive variables representing student selection and composition, clinical education length and design, and general program length and design were analyzed against first-time pass rates and ultimate pass rates on the NPTE. Univariate and multivariate multinomial regression analysis for first-time pass rates and logistic regression analysis for three-year ultimate pass rates were performed.
RESULTS
The variables associated with the first-time pass rate in the multivariate analysis were the mean undergraduate grade point average (GPA) and the average age of the cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that mean undergraduate GPA was associated with the three-year ultimate pass rate.
CONCLUSIONS
Mean undergraduate GPA was found to be the only modifiable predictor for both first-time and three-year pass rates among CAPTE-accredited physical therapy programs.

Keyword

Accreditation; Logistic models; Physical therapists; Puerto Rico; United States

MeSH Terms

Accreditation
Cohort Studies
Education*
Humans
Logistic Models
Multivariate Analysis
Observational Study
Physical Therapists
Puerto Rico
School Admission Criteria
United States*

Reference

1. Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Programs. 2014-2015 Fact Sheet Physical Therapist Education Programs [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education;2015. [cited 2015 Aug 12]. Available from: http://www.capteonline.org/uploadedfiles/capteorg/about_capte/resources/aggregate_program_data/aggregateprogramdata_ptprograms.pdf.

2. Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. 2012 NPTE Candidate Handbook: An essential source of information [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy;2015. [cited 2015 Aug 12]. Available from: http://www.fsbpt.org/FreeResources/NPTECandidateHandbook.aspx.

3. Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. Mission and Vision [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy;2015. [cited 2015 Aug 12] Available from: http://www.fsbpt.org/AboutUs.aspx.

4. Riddle DL, Utzman RR, Jewell DV, Pearson S, Kong X. Academic difficulty and program-level variables predict performance on the national physical therapy examination for licensure: a population-based cohort study. Phys Ther. 2009; 89:1182–1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080400.

5. Roehrig SM. Predictions of student problems in a baccalaureate physical therapy program. J Phys Ther Educ. 1990; 4:26–30.

6. Utzman RR, Riddle DL, Jewell DV. Use of demographic and quantitative admissions data to predict performance on the national physical therapy examination. Phys Ther. 2007; 87:1181–1193.

7. Galleher C, Rundquist PJ, Barker DB, Chang WP. Determining cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of success on the national physical therapy examination. Internet J Allied Health Sci. 2012; 10:4.

8. Hollman JH, Rindflesch AB, Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hellyer NJ, Kinlaw D. Retrospective analysis of the behavioral interview and other preadmission variables to predict licensure examination outcomes in physical therapy. J Allied Health. 2008; 37:97–104.

9. Shen J, Gao S. A solution to separation and multicollinearity in multiple logistic regression. J Data Sci. 2008; 6:515–531.

10. Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 86:829–835.

11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley;2000; 392.

12. Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991; 78:691–692.

13. Freedman D. A note on screening regression equations. Am Stat. 1983; 37:152–155.

14. Vendrely AM. An investigation of the relationships among academic performance, clinical performance, critical thinking, and success on the physical therapy licensure examination. J Allied Health. 2007; 36:e108–e123.

15. Phelps MR, Gerbasi F. Accreditation requirements for practice doctorates in 14 healthcare professions. AANA J. 2007; 77:19–26.

16. Grignon TP, Henley E, Lee KM, Abentroth MJ, Jette DU. Expected graduate outcomes in US physical therapist education programs: a qualitative study. J Phys Ther Educ. 2014; 48–57.