J Korean Med Sci.  2017 Oct;32(10):1657-1661. 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1657.

Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes among Interracial Couples in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. md_cho@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sung-Ae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Although the prevalence of interracial marriages in Korea is increasing, little is known regarding the pregnancy outcomes of interracial couples. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in pregnancy outcomes between Korean and interracial Korean-foreign couples. Data for infants born in 2011 and 2012 were obtained from the national birth registry of the Korean Statistical Office. The couples were subdivided into Korean father-Korean mother, Korean father-foreign mother, and foreign father-Korean mother groups. Pregnancy outcomes included neonates with low birth weight (< 2,500 g) and those with high birth weight (> 4,000 g). In 2010 and 2011, 888,447 Korean father-Korean mother, 36,024 Korean father-foreign mother, and 4,955 foreign father-Korean mother neonates were delivered in Korea. After adjustment for parental age, educational level, parity, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal sex, the birth weights were found to be different between groups, with the highest number of foreign father-Korean mother and lowest number of Korean father-foreign mother pregnancies. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk of low and large birth weights was higher in the Korean father-foreign mother and foreign father-Korean mother groups, respectively, compared with that in the Korean father-Korean mother group. There are significant differences in pregnancy outcomes including birth weights between Korean and interracial Korean-foreign couples.

Keyword

Interracial Marriage; Pregnancy Outcome; Birth Weight; Korea

MeSH Terms

Birth Weight
Family Characteristics*
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Korea*
Logistic Models
Marriage
Mothers
Parents
Parity
Parturition
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome*
Pregnancy*
Prevalence

Reference

1. Kim HS. Social integration and heath policy issues for international marriage migrant women in South Korea. Public Health Nurs. 2010; 27:561–570.
2. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (KR). International marriage status [Internet]. accessed on 17 December 2016. Available at http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=2430.
3. Iyasu S, Tomashek K, Barfield W. Infant mortality and low birth weight among black and white infants—United States, 1980–2000. JAMA. 2002; 288:825–826.
4. Migone A, Emanuel I, Mueller B, Daling J, Little RE. Gestational duration and birthweight in white, black and mixed-race babies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1991; 5:378–391.
5. Polednak AP, King G. Birth weight of US biracial (black-white) infants: regional differences. Ethn Dis. 1998; 8:340–349.
6. Gold KJ, DeMonner SM, Lantz PM, Hayward RA. Prematurity and low birth weight as potential mediators of higher stillbirth risk in mixed black/white race couples. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19:767–773.
7. Collins JW Jr, David RJ. The differential effect of traditional risk factors on infant birthweight among blacks and whites in Chicago. Am J Public Health. 1990; 80:679–681.
8. Wikipedia. List of average human height worldwide [Internet]. accessed on 9 December 2016. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_average_human_height_worldwide.
9. Troe EJ, Raat H, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Looman CW, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Verhulst FC, Witteman JC, Mackenbach JP. Explaining differences in birthweight between ethnic populations. The Generation R Study. BJOG. 2007; 114:1557–1565.
10. Wells JC, Sharp G, Steer PJ, Leon DA. Paternal and maternal influences on differences in birth weight between Europeans and Indians born in the UK. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e61116.
11. Geronimus AT. Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: a population-based test of the weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 42:589–597.
12. Beadle MR, Graham GN, Jarris PE, Hussein CA, Morgan A, Finch R. A national partnership for action to end health disparities in the United States. In : Proceedings of the World Conference on Social Determinants of Health; 19??1 October 2011; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Geneva: World Health Organization;2011.
13. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Scorza WE, Knuppel RA. Prenatal care and black-white fetal death disparity in the United States: heterogeneity by high-risk conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99:483–489.
14. Kaufman JS, Cooper RS, McGee DL. Socioeconomic status and health in blacks and whites: the problem of residual confounding and the resiliency of race. Epidemiology. 1997; 8:621–628.
15. Srinivasjois RM, Shah S, Shah PS; Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births. Biracial couples and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91:1134–1146.
16. Park MJ, Son M, Kim YJ, Paek D. Social inequality in birth outcomes in Korea, 1995–2008. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:25–35.
17. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1989. Mon Vital Stat Rep. 1992; 40:1–52.
18. National Center for Health Statistics. Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: United States, 1994. Mon Vital Stat Rep. 1995; 43:1–44.
19. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal Macrosomia. ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 159. Washington, D.C.: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;1991.
20. Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ. Macrosomia--maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 66:158–161.
21. Parks DG, Ziel HK. Macrosomia. A proposed indication for primary cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 52:407–409.
22. Bérard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, Subtil D, Vanderstichèle S, Monnier JC, Puech F. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998; 77:51–59.
23. Kim MJ. A comparative study on birth outcomes between Korean women and immigrant women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2011; 17:407–414.
24. Tsai YR, Lan KC, Kung FT, Lin PY, Chiang HJ, Lin YJ, Huang FJ. The effect of advanced paternal age on the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques among patients with azoospermia using cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 52:351–355.
25. Dain L, Auslander R, Dirnfeld M. The effect of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:1–8.
26. Astolfi P, De Pasquale A, Zonta LA. Paternal age and preterm birth in Italy, 1990 to 1998. Epidemiology. 2006; 17:218–221.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr