J Gynecol Oncol.  2018 Jan;29(1):e1. 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e1.

Role of lymphadenectomy in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: a matched-pair study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. pcoronadom@sego.es
  • 2Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • 3Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
  • 4Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • 5Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Sanitas La Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain.
  • 6Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • 7Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on morbidity, survival, and cost for intermediate-risk endometrial cancers (IREC).
METHODS
A multicenter retrospective cohort of 720 women with IREC (endometrioid histology with myometrial invasion <50% and grade 3; or myometrial invasion ≥50% and grades 1-2; or cervical involvement and grades 1-2) was carried out. All patients underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A matched pair analysis identified 178 pairs (178 with LND and 178 without it) equal in age, body mass index, co-morbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, myometrial invasion, and surgical approach. Demographic data, pathology results, perioperative morbidity, and survival were abstracted from medical records. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Cost analysis was carried out between both groups.
RESULTS
Both study groups were homogeneous in demographic data and pathologic results. The mean follow-up in patients free of disease was 61.7 months (range, 12.0-275.5). DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.79-2.28) and OS (HR=0.72; 95% CI=0.42-1.23) were similar in both groups, independently of nodes count. In LND group, positive nodes were found in 10 cases (5.6%). Operating time and late postoperative complications were higher in LND group (p<0.05). Infection rate was significantly higher in no-LND group (p=0.035). There were no statistical differences between both groups regarding operative morbidity and hospital stay. The global cost was similar for both groups.
CONCLUSION
Systematic LND in IREC has no benefit on survival, although it does not show an increase in perioperative morbidity or global cost.

Keyword

Endometrial Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Costs and Cost Analysis; Survival; Risk Factors; Morbidity

MeSH Terms

Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Disease-Free Survival
Endometrial Neoplasms*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hysterectomy
Length of Stay
Lymph Node Excision*
Matched-Pair Analysis
Medical Records
Pathology
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr