Clin Endosc.  2016 Nov;49(6):502-505. 10.5946/ce.2016.146.

Challenges of Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticobiliary Complications in Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Yangon General Hospital, University of Medicine (1), Yangon, Myanmar.
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. kimey@cu.ac.kr

Abstract

Pancreaticobiliary complications following various surgical procedures, including liver transplantation, are not uncommon and are important causes of morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic endoscopy plays a substantial role in these patients and can help to avoid the need for reoperation. However, the endoscopic approach in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal (GI) anatomy is technically challenging because of the difficulty in entering the enteral limb to reach the target orifice to manage pancreaticobiliary complications. Additional procedural complexity is due to the need of special devices and accessories to obtain successful cannulation and absence of an elevator in forward-viewing endoscopes, which is frequently used in this situation. Once bilioenteric anastomosis is reached, the technical success rates achieved in expert hands approach those of patients with intact GI anatomy. The success of endoscopic therapy in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy depends on multiple factors, including the expertise of the endoscopist, understanding of postoperative anatomic changes, and the availability of suitable scopes and accessories for endoscopic management. In this issue of Clinical Endoscopy, the focused review series deals with pancreatobiliary endoscopy in altered GI anatomy such as bilioenteric anastomosis and post-gastrectomy.

Keyword

Pancreaticobiliary complications; Challenge; Endotherapy; Altered anatomy

MeSH Terms

Catheterization
Elevators and Escalators
Endoscopes
Endoscopy
Extremities
Hand
Humans
Liver Transplantation
Mortality
Reoperation

Reference

1. Chahal P, Baron TH. ERCP for Acute and Chronic Adverse Events of Pancreatic Surgery and Pancreatic Trauma. In : Baron TH, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, editors. ERCP. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier;2013. p. 402–409.
2. Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res. 1991; 11:1831–1848.
3. House MG, Cameron JL, Schulick RD, et al. Incidence and outcome of biliary strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006; 243:571–576. discussion 576-578.
Article
4. Wang AY, Sauer BG, Behm BW, et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy effectively enables diagnostic and therapeutic retrograde cholangiography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:641–649.
Article
5. Navarrete C, Navarrete F, Gobelet JM, Valdivieso E, Muñoz-Navas M. Biliary Surgery Adverse Events Including Liver Transplantation. In : Baron TH, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, editors. ERCP. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier;2013. p. 389–401.
6. Lee DW, Jo HH, Abdullah J, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures after Liver Transplantation. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:457–461.
Article
7. Enestvedt BK, Kothari S, Pannala R, et al. Devices and techniques for ERCP in the surgically altered GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83:1061–1075.
Article
8. Chahal P, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-Whipple patients. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:1241–1245.
Article
9. Saleem A, Baron TH, Gostout CJ, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a single-balloon enteroscope in patients with altered Roux-en-Y anatomy. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:656–660.
Article
10. Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M, et al. Effective “short” double- balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy. 2009; 41:849–854.
11. Simmons DT, Baron TH, LeRoy A, Petersen BT. Percutaneous pancreatography for treatment of complicated pancreatic duct strictures. Pancreatology. 2008; 8:194–198.
Article
12. Yamauchi FI, Ortega CD, Blasbalg R, Rocha MS, Jukemura J, Cerri GG. Multidetector CT evaluation of the postoperative pancreas. Radiographics. 2012; 32:743–764.
Article
13. Chapman CG, Waxman I, Siddiqui UD. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)- Guided Pancreatic Duct Drainage: The Basics of When and How to Perform EUS-Guided Pancreatic Duct Interventions. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:161–167.
14. Kahaleh M, Hernandez AJ, Tokar J, Adams RB, Shami VM, Yeaton P. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy: analysis of its efficacy to drain inaccessible pancreatic ducts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65:224–230.
Article
15. François E, Kahaleh M, Giovannini M, Matos C, Devière J. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56:128–133.
Article
16. Kahaleh M, Yoshida C, Yeaton P. EUS antegrade pancreatography with gastropancreatic duct stent placement: Review of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:919–923.
Article
17. Tessier G, Bories E, Arvanitakis M, et al. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatobulbostomy for the treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic ductal dilatation inaccessible for transpapillary endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65:233–241.
Article
18. Bataille L, Deprez P. A new application for therapeutic EUS: main pancreatic duct drainage with a “pancreatic rendezvous technique”. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55:740–743.
Article
19. Mallery S, Matlock J, Freeman ML. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: Report of 6 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59:100–107.
Article
20. Sun C, Jin ZD, Pan X, Wang D, Li ZS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric pancreatic duct drainage after Whipple surgery in a patient with chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011; 43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E182–E183.
Article
21. Kurihara T, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Moriyasu F. Endoscopic ultrasonography- guided pancreatic duct drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with malignant and benign pancreatic duct obstructions. Dig Endosc. 2013; 25 Suppl 2:109–116.
22. Lo SK. ERCP in Surgically Altered Anatomy. In : Baron TH, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, editors. ERCP. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier;2013. p. 270–288.
23. Browne A, Kapoor S, Lewis AE, et al. A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Approach and Outcomes of Patients With Post-Surgical Anatomy Undergoing ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 81(Suppl):AB412.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr