Clin Endosc.  2016 Nov;49(6):498-499. 10.5946/ce.2016.134.

Is Endoscopic Ultrasonography Adequate for the Diagnosis of Gastric Schwannomas?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. keedon@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Diagnosis*
Endosonography*
Neurilemmoma*

Reference

1. Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126:301–307.
Article
2. Moon JS. Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Guiding Treatment Plans for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:220–225.
Article
3. Cho JW; Korean ESD Study Group. Current Guidelines in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:235–240.
Article
4. Hwang JH, Saunders MD, Rulyak SJ, Shaw S, Nietsch H, Kimmey MB. A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:202–208.
Article
5. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002; 33:459–465.
Article
6. Lee JH, Cho CJ, Park YS, et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016; 51:486–493.
Article
7. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier JP. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut. 2000; 46:88–92.
Article
8. Shah P, Gao F, Edmundowicz SA, Azar RR, Early DS. Predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54:1265–1269.
Article
9. Park HC, Son DJ, Oh HH, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic characteristics of gastric schwannoma distinguished from gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015; 65:21–26.
Article
10. Voltaggio L, Murray R, Lasota J, Miettinen M. Gastric schwannoma: a clinicopathologic study of 51 cases and critical review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 2012; 43:650–659.
Article
11. Jung MK, Jeon SW, Cho CM, et al. Gastric schwannomas: endosonographic characteristics. Abdom Imaging. 2008; 33:388–390.
Article
12. Yoon JM, Kim GH, Park DY, et al. Endosonographic Features of Gastric Schwannoma: A Single Center Experience. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:548–554.
Article
13. Lee JH, Choi KD, Kim MY, et al. Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥2 cm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:1010–1018.
Article
14. Na HK, Lee JH, Park YS, et al. Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2015; 48:152–157.
Article
15. Kim EY. Fine-needle biopsy: should this be the first choice in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition? Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:425–428.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr