J Korean Med Sci.  2016 Feb;31(Suppl 1):S55-S58. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S55.

Factors Related to Radiation Exposure during Lumbar Spine Intervention

• Choi MH
• Choi BG
• Jung SE
• Byun JY

• KMID: 2363381
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S55

Abstract

Fluoroscopy guidance is useful to confirm anatomical landmark and needle location for spine intervention; however, it can lead to radiation exposure in patients, physicians, and medical staff. Physicians who used fluoroscopy should be cognizant of radiation exposure and intend to minimize radiation dose. We retrospectively reviewed three lumbar spine intervention procedures (nerve root block, medial branch block, and facet joint block) at our institution between June and December, 2014. We performed 268 procedures on 220 patients and found significant difference in radiation dose between two groups classified by performing physicians. The physician who controlled the fluoroscopy unit directly used significantly shorter fluoroscopy (6 seconds) that resulted in a smaller radiation dose (dose area product [DAP] 0.59 Gy.cm2) than the physician supervising the radiographer controlling the fluoroscopy unit (72 seconds, DAP 5.31 Gy.cm2, P < 0.001). The analysis indicates that the difference in fluoroscopy time depends on whether a physician or a radiographer controls the fluoroscopy unit.

Keyword

Back Pain; Radiography, Interventional; Fluoroscopy; Radiation Dosage; Radiographic Magnification

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Fluoroscopy
Health Personnel/psychology
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae/*diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Management
Physicians/psychology
Radiation Dosage
*Radiation Exposure
Retrospective Studies

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Patient radiation dose versus fluoroscopy time. Scatter plots show a relationship between radiation dose and fluoroscopy time. There is a positive correlation between fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (correlation coefficient: 0.886, P < 0.001).

Reference

1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999; 354:581–585.

2. Deyo RA. Back surgery--who needs it? N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:2239–2243.

3. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine. 2009; 34:1094–1109.

4. Fenton DS, Czervionke LF. Image-guided spine intervention. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders;2003. p. 9–50.

5. Iannuccilli JD, Prince EA, Soares GM. Interventional spine procedures for management of chronic low back pain-a primer. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013; 30:307–317.

6. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, McCollough CH, Mettler FA, Pearce MS, Suleiman OH, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011; 258:889–905.

7. Jones AK, Balter S, Rauch P, Wagner LK. Medical imaging using ionizing radiation: optimization of dose and image quality in fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 2014; 41:014301.

8. Zhou Y, Singh N, Abdi S, Wu J, Crawford J, Furgang FA. Fluoroscopy radiation safety for spine interventional pain procedures in university teaching hospitals. Pain Physician. 2005; 8:49–53.

9. Botwin KP, Thomas S, Gruber RD, Torres FM, Bouchlas CC, Rittenberg JJ, Rao S. Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:697–701.

10. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Moss TL, Pampati V. Radiation exposure to the physician in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2002; 5:385–393.

11. Botwin KP, Freeman ED, Gruber RD, Torres-Rames FM, Bouchtas CG, Sanelli JT, Hanna AF. Radiation exposure to the physician performing fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2001; 4:343–348.

12. Hanu-Cernat DE, Duarte R, Raphael JH, Mutagi H, Kapur S, Senthil L. Type of interventional pain procedure, body weight, and presence of spinal pathology are determinants of the level of radiation exposure for fluoroscopically guided pain procedures. Pain Pract. 2012; 12:434–439.

13. Frederick-Dyer KC, Faulkner AR, Chang TT, Heidel RE, Pasciak AS. Online training on the safe use of fluoroscopy can result in a significant decrease in patient dose. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20:1272–1277.

14. Yu SK, Cheung YK, Chan TL, Kung CM, Yuen MK. Reduction of radiation dose to patients undergoing barium enema by dose audit. Br J Radiol. 2001; 74:162–165.

15. Fefferman NR, Sabach AS, Rivera R, Milla S, Pinkney LP, Strubel NA, Babb J. The efficacy of digital fluoroscopic image capture in the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39:1179–1187.

16. Delichas M, Psarrakos K, Molyvda-Athanassopoulou E, Giannoglou G, Sioundas A, Hatziioannou K, Papanastassiou E. Radiation exposure to cardiologists performing interventional cardiology procedures. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 48:268–273.