Korean J Gastroenterol.  2016 Sep;68(3):127-131. 10.4166/kjg.2016.68.3.127.

Current Status of Translational Research on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. mipark@kosinmed.or.kr

Abstract

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the incidence of some of its complications have risen strikingly over the last few decades. With the increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of GERD along with the development of proton pump inhibitors, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to GERD have changed dramatically over the past decade. However, GERD still poses a problem to many clinicians since the spectrum of the disease has evolved to encompass more challenging presentations such as refractory GERD and extra-esophageal manifestations. The aim of this article is to provide a review of available current translational research on GERD. This review includes acid pocket, ambulatory pH monitoring, impedance pH monitoring, mucosa impedance, and high resolution manometry. This article discusses current translational research on GERD.

Keyword

Gastroesophageal reflux; Esophageal pH monitoring; Impedance

MeSH Terms

Electric Impedance
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Incidence
Manometry
Mucous Membrane
Prevalence
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Translational Medical Research*
Proton Pump Inhibitors

Reference

References

1. Min BH, Huh KC, Jung HK, et al. Functional Dyspepsia Study Group of Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in Korea: a population-based study using the Rome III criteria. Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59:2721–2729.
Article
2. Fletcher J, Wirz A, Young J, Vallance R, McColl KE. Unbuffered highly acidic gastric juice exists at the gastroesophageal junction after a meal. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121:775–783.
Article
3. Boeckxstaens GE, Rohof WO. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014; 43:15–25.
Article
4. Beaumont H, Bennink RJ, de Jong J, Boeckxstaens GE. The position of the acid pocket as a major risk factor for acidic reflux in healthy subjects and patients with GORD. Gut. 2010; 59:441–451.
Article
5. Clarke AT, Wirz AA, Manning JJ, Ballantyne SA, Alcorn DJ, McColl KE. Severe reflux disease is associated with an enlarged unbuffered proximal gastric acid pocket. Gut. 2008; 57:292–297.
Article
6. Rohof WO, Bennink RJ, de Ruigh AA, Hirsch DP, Zwinderman AH, Boeckxstaens GE. Effect of azithromycin on acid reflux, hiatus hernia and proximal acid pocket in the postprandial period. Gut. 2012; 61:1670–1677.
Article
7. Rohof WO, Bennink RJ, Smout AJ, Thomas E, Boeckxstaens GE. An alginate-antacid formulation localizes to the acid pocket to reduce acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11:1585–1591.
Article
8. Thomas E, Wade A, Crawford G, Jenner B, Levinson N, Wilkinson J. Randomised clinical trial: relief of upper gastrointestinal symptoms by an acid pocket-targeting alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 39:595–602.
9. American Gastroenterological Association. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011; 140:1084–1091.
Article
10. DeVault KR, Castell DO. American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:190–200.
Article
11. Hirano I, Richter JE. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102:668–685.
Article
12. Fock KM, Talley NJ, Fass R, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23:8–22.
Article
13. Karamanolis G, Triantafyllou K, Psatha P, et al. Bravo 48-hour wireless pH monitoring in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Objective gastroesophageal reflux disease parameters predict the responses to proton pump inhibitors. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012; 18:169–173.
Article
14. Sung HJ, Chung WC, Roh JW, et al. Prediction of the response to proton pump inhibitor treatment using wireless ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with globus sense. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015; 65:85–89.
Article
15. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Conchillo JM, Smout AJ. Addition of esophageal impedance monitoring to pH monitoring increases the yield of symptom association analysis in patients off PPI therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:453–459.
Article
16. Sifrim D, Mittal R, Fass R, et al. Review article: acidity and volume of the refluxate in the genesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25:1003–1017.
Article
17. Farré R, van Malenstein H, De Vos R, et al. Short exposure of oesophageal mucosa to bile acids, both in acidic and weakly acidic conditions, can impair mucosal integrity and provoke dilated intercellular spaces. Gut. 2008; 57:1366–1374.
Article
18. Koek GH, Sifrim D, Lerut T, Janssens J, Tack J. Effect of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen in patients with symptoms and duode-no-gastro-oesophageal reflux refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2003; 52:1397–1402.
Article
19. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, et al. The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103:2685–2693.
Article
20. Zerbib F, Duriez A, Roman S, Capdepont M, Mion F. Determinants of gastro-oesophageal reflux perception in patients with persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2008; 57:156–160.
Article
21. Shi Y, Tan N, Zhang N, et al. Predictors of proton pump inhibitor failure in non-erosive reflux disease: a study with impedance-pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28:674–679.
Article
22. Ates F, Yuksel ES, Higginbotham T, et al. Mucosal impedance discriminates GERD from non-GERD conditions. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148:334–343.
Article
23. Farré R, Blondeau K, Clement D, et al. Evaluation of oesophageal mucosa integrity by the intraluminal impedance technique. Gut. 2011; 60:885–892.
Article
24. Lehman MB, Clark SB, Ormsby AH, Rice TW, Richter JE, Goldblum JR. Squamous mucosal alterations in esophagectomy specimens from patients with end-stage achalasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001; 25:1413–1418.
Article
25. Kjellin AP, Ost AE, Pope CE 2nd. Histology of esophageal mucosa from patients with achalasia. Dis Esophagus. 2005; 18:257–261.
Article
26. Fass R, Sifrim D. Management of heartburn not responding to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2009; 58:295–309.
Article
27. Hershcovici T, Fass R. Step-by-step management of refractory gastresophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus. 2013; 26:27–36.
Article
28. Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T, Fass R. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013; 42:57–70.
Article
29. Wilder-Smith C, Röhss K, Bokelund Singh S, Sagar M, Nagy P. The effects of dose and timing of esomeprazole administration on 24-h, daytime and nighttime acid inhibition in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 32:1249–1256.
Article
30. Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, et al. Acid and nonacid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut. 2006; 55:1398–1402.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr