Anesth Pain Med.  2016 Oct;11(4):366-374. 10.17085/apm.2016.11.4.366.

Assessment of chloral hydrate-centered pediatric sedation performed by non-anesthesiologists

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bglim9205@korea.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chloral hydrate-based pediatric sedation conducted by non-anesthesiologists.
METHODS
The design and setting of this study was a single-center retrospective study performed at a tertiary university hospital between July 2012 and May 2013. A total of 519 children were enrolled in this study. We investigated the sedation medication, age of patients and type of diagnostic tests or procedures and evaluated the success rate of sedation, sedation/recovery profiles and adverse events.
RESULTS
Most patients underwent moderate sedation for diagnostic tests. The most commonly used sedative drug was chloral hydrate, which was solely used for 482 patients. A combination of chloral hydrate/midazolam was used for 24 patients and midazolam only was used for 13 patients. Use of chloral hydrate resulted in a sedation success rate of 65.5% after the initial dose and a success rate of 95.2% with additional doses. The sedation failure rate in children > 6 years was significantly higher than that in children under 6 years. In all patients, the overall onset time and recovery time were too slow and long, respectively, and there was no critical complication.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that chloral hydrate-based pediatric sedation conducted by non-anesthesiologists was mostly moderate, with a high success rate and a low complication rate. However, the overall onset time and recovery time were too slow and long, respectively. Especially, alternative sedation regimens are required in children > 6 years considering the slower onset time and higher failure rate of sedation.

Keyword

Child; Chloral hydrate; Midazolam; Non-anesthesiologists; Sedation

MeSH Terms

Child
Chloral Hydrate
Conscious Sedation
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Humans
Midazolam
Retrospective Studies
Chloral Hydrate
Midazolam

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting the failure or success of sedation. This curve shows the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.732 and the cut-off value of age of 4.79 years (sensitivity 0.696, specificity 0.776) (P < 0.001).


Reference

1. Smallman B. Pediatric sedation: can it be safely performed by non-anesthesiologists? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002; 15:455–9. DOI: 10.1097/00001503-200208000-00008. PMID: 17019238.
Article
2. Chiaretti A, Benini F, Pierri F, Vecchiato K, Ronfani L, Agosto C, et al. Safety and efficacy of propofol administered by paediatricians during procedural sedation in children. Acta Paediatr. 2014; 103:182–7. DOI: 10.1111/apa.12472. PMID: 24138461.
Article
3. Orel R, Brecelj J, Dias JA, Romano C, Barros F, Thomson M, et al. Review on sedation for gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in children by non-anesthesiologists. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 7:895–911. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i9.895. PMID: 26240691. PMCID: PMC4515424.
Article
4. Delgado J, Toro R, Rascovsky S, Arango A, Angel GJ, Calvo V, et al. Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists. Pediatr Radiol. 2015; 45:108–14. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3091-0. PMID: 25142238.
Article
5. Kezerashvili A, Fisher JD, DeLaney J, Mushiyev S, Monahan E, Taylor V, et al. Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008; 21:43–51. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-007-9191-0. PMID: 18273696.
Article
6. Avlonitou E, Balatsouras DG, Margaritis E, Giannakopoulos P, Douniadakis D, Tsakanikos M. Use of chloral hydrate as a sedative for auditory brainstem response testing in a pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 75:760–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.02.010. PMID: 21531030.
Article
7. Pershad J, Palmisano P, Nichols M. Chloral hydrate: the good and the bad. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999; 15:432–5. DOI: 10.1097/00006565-199912000-00018. PMID: 10608336.
8. Ceçen E, Uygur O, Tosun A. Severe central nervous and respiratory system depression after sedation with chloral hydrate: a case report. Turk J Pediatr. 2009; 51:497–9. PMID: 20112608.
9. Henderson GN, Yan Z, James MO, Davydova N, Stacpoole PW. Kinetics and metabolism of chloral hydrate in children: identification of dichloroacetate as a metabolite. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 235:695–8. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6868. PMID: 9207222.
Article
10. McBay AJ, Boling VR Jr, Reynolds PC. Spectrophotometric determination of trichloroethanol in chloral hydrate poisoning. J Anal Toxicol. 1980; 4:99–101. DOI: 10.1093/jat/4.2.99. PMID: 7421142.
Article
11. Heistein LC, Ramaciotti C, Scott WA, Coursey M, Sheeran PW, Lemler MS. Chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric echocardiography: physiologic responses, adverse events, and risk factors. Pediatrics. 2006; 117:e434–41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1445. PMID: 16481449.
Article
12. Choi YS, Son YJ, Song ES, Cho YK, Kim YO, Kim CJ, et al. Effect of chloral hydrate used for pediatric sedation. J Korean Child Neurol Soc. 2008; 16:78–85.
13. D'Agostino J, Terndrup TE. Chloral hydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000; 16:1–4. DOI: 10.1097/00006565-200002000-00001. PMID: 10698133.
14. Robbertze R, Posner KL, Domino KB. Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006; 19:436–42. DOI: 10.1097/01.aco.0000236146.46346.fe. PMID: 16829728.
Article
15. Choi YJ, Kim MH, Song CS, Kim SH, Hong JY, Suk EH, et al. Sedation and general anesthesia outside of the operating room. Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 7:230–5.
16. Ozdemir D, Kayserili E, Arslanoglu S, Gulez P, Vergin C. Ketamine and midazolam for invasive procedures in children with malignancy: a comparison of routes of intravenous, oral, and rectal administration. J Trop Pediatr. 2004; 50:224–8. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/50.4.224. PMID: 15357562.
Article
17. Miller J, Xue B, Hossain M, Zhang MZ, Loepke A, Kurth D. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and chloral hydrate sedation for transthoracic echocardiography in infants and toddlers: a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016; 26:266–72. DOI: 10.1111/pan.12819. PMID: 26616644.
Article
18. Derakhshanfar H, Kordi MM, Amini A, Shojahee M. A comparative study on the sedative effect of oral midazolam and oral chloral hydrate medication in lumbar puncture. Acta Med Croatica. 2013; 67:401–5. PMID: 24979880.
19. Kim EY, Kim JS, You SH. The comparative study on the sedative effect of different intravenous midazolam dosages for pediatric dental patients. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2005; 3:416–26.
20. Baek SY, Koh H, Chung KS. Vital sign and sedative effect of midazolam for conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Korean J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 9:169–75.
Article
21. Sahyoun C, Krauss B. Clinical implications of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procedural sedation agents in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012; 24:225–32. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283504f88. PMID: 22245909.
Article
22. Papineni McIntosh A, Ashley PF, Lourenço-Matharu L. Reported side effects of intravenous midazolam sedation when used in paediatric dentistry: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015; 25:153–64. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12127. PMID: 25131504.
Article
23. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96:1004–17. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031. PMID: 11964611.
24. Wheeler DS, Jensen RA, Poss WB. A randomized, blinded comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2001; 40:381–7. DOI: 10.1177/000992280104000704.
25. Hijazi OM, Ahmed AE, Anazi JA, Al-Hashemi HE, Al-Jeraisy MI. Chloral hydrate versus midazolam as sedative agents for diagnostic procedures in children. Saudi Med J. 2014; 35:123–31. PMID: 24562510.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr